Generally, I have been a fan of Tillerson. He is an adult in the room and, importantly, seems immune from all the barking that takes place in Washington. Tillerson is steady, is knowledgeable and moves at his own pace. But that pace, or the lack of a faster one, has become a source of criticism.
Washington thinks of itself as so vitally important that empty blocks in the federal bureaucracy's organization chart can only mean that a vital government function is not being carried out.
I have my doubts.
The truth is, the State Department, like every other executive department, suffers from redundancies and make-work jobs. But there is such a thing as needing good people to do important jobs.
For his part, John J. Sullivan, the recently confirmed deputy secretary of state, is getting good reviews. As per Tillerson's instruction, Sullivan is already working to reorganize the State Department and empower the best career Foreign Service officers.
In the coming weeks, the Trump administration will soon learn whether the slow pace of filling top political appointments at the State Department is affecting the quality of our diplomacy and the ability to implement and communicate the United States' foreign policy. We may be about to find out if Trump's State Department is prepared to manage important international events and potentially historic challenges.
With the whole world watching, this week's G-20 meeting will set in stone our allies' opinions of the president and his team; Putin will form his core impression of the president and determine whether Trump is serious or if he can be easily manipulated; and, finally, the president will have to listen to his team's advice on North Korea, decide on a course of action and then explain it to the world.
Nothing thus far in the Trump presidency has had such downrange consequences as any of these three events. And all eyes are on Tillerson.
Personnel matters aside, Tillerson has won the respect of key world leaders and that of Trump. Considering just how often he and the president speak, it is that much more likely that Trump will defer to his secretary of state and perhaps even suppress some of his own instincts to freelance, ad-lib or, worst of all, recklessly tweet when mature patience is required.
And yet, while Tillerson has performed effectively and maintained the confidence of the president, some of his recent interactions with others in the White House have left wounds that have yet to heal.
It remains to be seen just how long such a dichotomy can last.
So, as the week unfolds, there is a spotlight on Trump, Tillerson and the president's team. Much is at stake and I cannot remember a time when there was more uncertainty about the dependability and quality of America's actions, resolve and personnel.