Jewish World Review July 21, 2003 / 21 Tamuz, 5763

Jack Kelly

Jack Kelly
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Don't get giddy about the recall | Supporters of embattled California Governor Gray Davis have gone to the courts to try to block a recall election, on the grounds that some of the petitions were circulated by people who were not registered to vote in California. I wish them well.

Davis is a terrible governor, and a rotten human being. His political modus operandi has been to raise tons of money from special interest groups, and to use it to smear his political opponents.

These are good reasons for disliking Davis. By they are not, to my mind, reasons sufficient to recall him. The recall provision in California's constitution is an important safeguard. I wish more states had it. But the recall provision should be exercised only if there is genuine malfeasance. If Davis had been accepting bribes, or putting tax revenues into his pocket, he should go. But if he were thrown out of office early just because he's a liar and an incompetent, where would we stop? How many other governors would be looking over their shoulders? If the recall election goes forward, it will accelerate our dangerous drift toward all politics all the time.

I confess that I also want the legal challenge to the recall election to succeed because I can't think of anything that would benefit Republicans more. Californians now merely angry with the state's political establishment would be seething with rage at this latest insider maneuver to frustrate popular will. And Democrats would still be stuck with a very unpopular governor, an even more unpopular legislature, and an all but insoluble problem. The massacre that would take place at the polls next year, and in 2006, will be awesome to behold.

Since recall backers have collected nearly twice as many signatures as the law requires, it is doubtful the plaintiffs in the lawsuit can keep the question off the ballot. But they could delay the recall election until the primary March 3.

Donate to JWR

This could be a good result for Democrats, because it would coincide with the presidential primary, which is expected to bring many more Democrats to the polls than would a special election this fall.

But a March primary has its downsides for Democrats. It would keep the issue in the news longer. It could overshadow the presidential primary, depriving Democratic presidential wannabes of attention. Davis could suck up money Democrats will need to be competitive against Bush in the fall. Since California's presidential primary is "open," Republicans brought to the polls by the recall election might vote in the primary for the Democratic presidential contender they consider weakest in the general election. And if Davis survives the recall, he'll still be governor, he'll still be unpopular, and he'll still be facing a crisis nearly certain to drain further what little public support he has remaining.

The optimal result for Democrats would be if Davis would resign before the recall election qualified for the ballot. This would make Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante - also a Democrat, but much more popular than Davis - governor, and stop the recall process in its tracks. But that would require Davis to fall on his political sword, something he is unlikely to do as long as he thinks he has a chance to do keep his job. And though Bustamante is popular now, his popularity might not last long if he can make no more progress on solving California's fiscal crisis than Davis has. And then the ire which has been directed at Davis personally may be directed more broadly at his party.

The next best outcome for Democrats would be if a popular Democrat, like Sen. Dianne Feinstein, would put his or her name on the recall ballot. Feinstein almost certainly would win. But the presence of her name, or that of any other Democratic heavyweight on the ballot would guarantee that Davis will be recalled.

Some Democrats think the best outcome for them would be to have a Republican win. Then if he couldn't get his budget plan through a heavily Democratic legislature - as he almost certainly couldn't - he'd get much of the blame now being heaped on Davis. Misery loves company.

Every weekday publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor Jack Kelly, a former Marine and Green Beret, was a deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force in the Reagan administration. Comment by clicking here.

Jack Kelly Archives

© 2003, Jack Kelly