The latest Morning Consult/Politico poll finds Biden at 39% (statistically the same as last week's survey, Sanders at 19% (also the same) with Sens. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., and Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., at 8% and Mayor Pete Buttigieg at 6%.
While on one hand the race seems static, the pollsters note that Sanders has declined with his strongest age group (18-29) from 39% in February to 33% presently. (Some of those have gone to Warren, whose improved with this age bracket.) Biden also is pummeling Sanders with over 65 voters (54/9%) and with other age groups as well. The race is 45 to 14% for voters 55-64 and 41 to 18% for those 45 to 54%.
In early primary states, presumably where voters are more plugged in, Biden leads by 20 points, but Warren is up 3 points from last week at 9 percent.
Let me suggest 5 takeways from the polling at this stage in the race.
First, the only chance for many candidates to break out of the pack will be the debates, and it won't be easy with the field divided into two panels on consecutive nights and each candidate very likely getting less than 10 minutes. If Biden is attacked he may well swat the challenger away, with little time for the latter to follow up.
In each of these outings Biden will be happy if nothing much happens or the "hits" are divided among the zillion candidates. (Also remember he can be a fierce debater as he was against former speaker Paul Ryan in 2012, and when need be, very disciplined as he was against Sarah Palin in 2008.)
Second, it's entirely possible Warren will pass Sanders. She's going up in polls, getting coverage for an endless string of policy ideas and radiating cheeriness. Sanders is simply rerunning 2016. It's telling that his youngest voters, perhaps bored with the re-run are beginning to drift away. He compares unfavorably to Warren when it comes to age, demeanor and substance.
Third, Biden isn't likely to self-destruct on his own. The media's obsession with him not making gaffes seems overwrought. President Donald Trump showed in a big field a candidate can flick away gaffes, which get swallowed in the 100 Twitter news cycles before average voters hear of them. One or more of his competitors will have to knock him off balance and that, as we said, isn't easy in these 10-ring circuses. In short, while it's a long way to voting time, no one should underestimate the advantages and goodwill Biden enjoys.
Fourth, the gap between Twitter/pundits/cable TV and actual voters is huge. Biden does much better in the Morning Consult/Politico poll with non-twitter users (because of his commanding position with over 65 year old voters who may not be on social media). "Thirty-two% of Democratic primary voters who use Twitter daily support Biden. Among voters who don't ever use Twitter, that jumps to 44 percent."
Unfortunately, candidates, pundits and journalists are inextricably pulled into the Twitter buzz, looking for "trending" topics and noting when a candidate gets clobbered, usually by far-left Twitter users who are over represented on Twitter. The best thing a campaign could do would be to have a very junior staffer monitor the Twitterverse and allow everyone else (especially the candidate) ignore it as much as possible.
Finally, the money race looks more traditional lately. All the candidates swore off PAC's but many are doing big fundraisers with donors who can "max-out" without a second thought. Warren won't do these but Biden, Buttigieg and O'Rourke have.
While this doesn't make a whole lot of difference now, as we get closer to Super Tuesday fundraising matters (especially in huge states like Texas and California).
Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.