Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review May 17, 2001 / 24 Iyar, 5761

Clarence Page

Clarence Page
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Anti-pot politics squeeze the ill -- THE Supreme Court has spoken. Federal anti-drug laws trump state laws that allow patients to have marijuana when their doctors recommend it.

That's sad news to Kathleen Marie "Kitty" Tucker, a 57-year-old lawyer and mother who favors the legalization of marijuana for medicinal use.

She could use some.

Since 1987 she has suffered from migraines and fibromyalgia, a chronic muscle pain disorder, too severe to let her work outside her suburban Maryland home.

She's been using such legal drugs as Marinol, a synthetic version of the active ingredient in marijuana. But none relieve her symptoms as well - and with as few side effects - as smoking marijuana used to, she says.

She knows because she used to grow her own marijuana in the basement of her family home in Takoma Park, Md., a Washington suburb.

But, in 1999, her then-16-year-old daughter, in an apparent burst of teen rage, told the local police about mommy's indoor garden.

Weeks later, the charges were dropped. But, by then, Tucker's husband, Robert Alvarez, had lost his job as a senior policy adviser at the U.S. Energy Department, and the family had been put through an emotional and legal ringer.

Tucker's hopes for legal pot evaporated along with those of numerous other sufferers on Monday when the Supreme Court ruled 8-to-0 against marijuana-supplying co-ops in California. Federal law does not allow the distribution of marijuana even to people whose doctors recommend it to alleviate symptoms of serious illness, the court ruled.

That ruling dealt a setback, if not a definitive blow, to the movement that, so far, has led to the legalization of medical marijuana in eight states plus the District of Columbia.

Sure, you can legalize medicinal marijuana all you want, the high court told the voters and legislators, but that doesn't mean Washington has to let it happen.

"It is very disappointing to see our democracy kicked away," Tucker said in a voice that sounded wracked with pain.

Yes, "kicked away" is a good way to describe the way marijuana, even for legitimate relief of illness, has become a political football. Poll after poll tends to show that most people support doctor-approved medicinal use of marijuana.

Yet, the issue has failed with most Washington politicians and most state legislatures, except for Hawaii. It is as if the issue has nothing to do with real science or even real people anymore, just politics and posturing.

Nobody ever lost an election by promising to be "tough" on drugs, even when it means being unnecessarily tough on the sick.

Justice Clarence Thomas, author of the high court's ruling, offered a good example. When he cited the federal statute that says marijuana has "no currently accepted medical use," he was expressing a political view, not a scientific one.

Lawmakers could simply look at 1999 report by the Institute of Medicine, a branch of the National Academy of Sciences. It confirmed the effectiveness of marijuana's active components in treating pain, nausea and the anorexic wasting syndrome associated with AIDS.

The report did caution against smoking marijuana for more than six months. After all, smoking anything is hazardous to your health. Unfortunately, the study did not discuss vaporizers, a popular non-smoking alternative in the California marijuana clubs that were parties in the Supreme Court case.

So more research needs to be done. Both sides of the debate can agree on that. Yet, Washington politicians have been extremely reluctant to grant government-approved marijuana for research. So, new research gets stuck in a Catch-22: The politicians say we can't legalize marijuana because there's not enough research; then they don't fund the research. How convenient.

Opponents of legalization say that prosecutors probably won't spend much time or money going after sick patients. They're probably right. It wouldn't be worth it. Juries would be reluctant to convict, especially in a state or town that voted overwhelmingly for legalization.

But, as Kitty Tucker's case shows, you don't have to be prosecuted after a drug arrest to be punished by it.

First the punishment, then - guess what? No trial. That's what happens when politicians care less about people than they do about posturing.

During his presidential campaign, President Bush said he opposed legalizing medical marijuana in Texas but thought the federal government should leave the question up to the states. That's a campaign promise he should keep.

Comment on JWR contributor Clarence Page's column by clicking here.


05/15/01: Was Babe Ruth black?
05/10/01: U.N.'s torture caucus slaps Uncle Sam
05/08/01: 'The Sopranos' a reflection of our times
05/03/01: 'Free-fire' zones, then and now
05/01/01: War on drugs misfires against students
04/26/01: Another athlete gets foot-in-mouth disease
04/23/01: 'Slave' boat mystery reveals real tragedy
04/19/01: McVeigh's execution show
04/12/01: Not this time, Jesse
04/05/01: Dubya is DEFINITELY his own man, you fools!
04/02/01: Milking MLK
03/29/01: The candidate who censored himself?
03/22/01: "Will Hispanics elbow blacks out of the way as the nation's most prominent minority group?"
03/19/01: Blacks and the SATs
03/15/01: The census: How much race still matters in the everyday life of America
03/12/01: Jesse is a victim!
03/08/01: Saving kids from becoming killers
03/01/01: Parents owe "Puffy" and Eminem our thanks

© 2001 TMS