Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review March 10, 2003 / 6 Adar II, 5763

Joel Mowbray

Joel Mobray
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports


One last chance --- for the UN


http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | Allowing an almost entirely disgraced entity one last chance for redemption, President Bush Thursday extended a final opportunity to salvage what is left of what used to be an American ally: the United Nations Security Council. By insisting on a vote on a follow-up resolution, Bush is, in his own words, forcing the other members of the council to "show their cards." For those who side with Saddam, there will be no hiding from history.

Several countries--under political cover provided by France and Germany--are now getting cold feet, but inaction is the easy way out. Saddam Hussein is not truly disarming--nor will he ever--and lest there be any doubts, the period just before the Gulf War should serve as a powerful reminder of how he operates. Saddam steadfastly refused to back down from his militaristic posturing, but when the writing appeared on the wall, he began making gestures to stave off war, such as releasing the human shields he had held hostage for months.

A dozen years later, Saddam apparently thinks his recycled bag of tricks will succeed. After initially saying that he would not destroy the long-range al-Samoud missiles, Saddam did an about-face just before the deadline to do so--even as he continues to build more. But Saddam has yet to destroy some 6,000 bombs and 1,000 tons of mustard gas. Same goes for 10,000 liters of anthrax and 16,000 liters of botulinum toxins. And he hasn't even attempted to show proof that he has destroyed this frightening arsenal.

Undeterred by Saddam's noncompliance on numerous fronts, chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix is encouraging the Security Council to give his new friend still more time to disarm. Blix acknowledged to the panel last month that Saddam has yet to account for massive amounts of weapons, but he is pointing to the destruction of al-Samoud missiles as proof that Saddam is a changed man. But not even Blix is that foolish--he is merely attempting any tack to produce the "peaceful" outcome he wants. Leaving Saddam in place and his weapons untouched, however, will not mean "peace." Not that that matters to the soft-on-Saddam crowd.

With the UN Security Council poised to act, speculation abounds that the U.S. and Britain will eventually embrace compromise language in order to salvage some sort of victory. The Canadian proposal, which many consider the front-runner, would set a firm disarmament deadline of March 31. But what should make that date special when Saddam has let several other circled days on the calendar come and go, not to mention that he could have disarmed any time in the past twelve years? And if the next resolution draws yet another line in the sand, when will "one last chance" mean one last chance?

The hymn being sung by members of the Franco-German blockade is that there is no need for another resolution. They're right. Resolution 1441, which followed 16 previous Security Council resolutions, demanded that Saddam would face "serious consequences" if he did not disarm. The unanimously-passed measure did not provide loopholes for Saddam to cart his cache around in mobile units or hide his chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction. The UN is so far removed from reality that the "compromise" response is an 18th resolution. Simply passing another resolution is not a "serious consequence."

The U.S. is only pushing for a final UN resolution to help British Prime Minister Tony Blair--not a bad motive given how Thatcher-esque he has been in his resolve--but there is a bonus prize involved: allowing the UN to save itself from irrelevancy. As the President reminded the world last September 12, what authority--moral or otherwise--will the UN have left if it allows the repeated and willful violation of terms of surrender it sets following an offensive war?

War in Iraq is going to happen, with or without the support of the UN. The U.S. won't be going it alone, though. Dozens of nations have already joined the United States in its quest to liberate Iraq. The only unknown at this point is whether the people of the democratic Federation of Iraq will owe a "thank you" to the UN.

Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.




JWR contributor Joel Mowbray is the author of the forthcoming book "Dangerous Diplomacy: How the State Department Endangers America's Security". Comment by clicking here.

03/03/03: Democracy domino theory
02/28/03: $1 Trillion tax cut?
02/12/03: Saudi Slavery in America
02/05/03: "We're Going to War"
02/04/03: State Department's idea of a "traitor"
01/27/03: State's cold shoulder
01/02/03: Canada: The Weakest Link
12/20/02: Real Story of Yemen's Scud Missile Purchase
12/18/02: Lott's got the Senate in the palm of his hand
12/12/02: White House moves closer to finding Iraq in "material breach"
12/10/02: A 9/11 plotter confessed
12/06/02: Saudi Spin doctors dodge U.S. marshals
12/03/02: Wild, Wild Web
12/02/02: Justice, finally, for terrorism victims
11/26/02: Sue McDonalds? I Lost 80 lbs With Fast Food!
11/25/02: The State Department's spin machine
11/22/02: Finally! No more open door for Saudis
11/20/02: A defeat for border security
11/18/02: Trial lawyers vs. homeland security
10/09/02: The visas that shouldn't have been
09/26/02: The "right" Miss America
09/23/02: Tax Cuts, R.I.P.
09/17/02: Freedom denied
09/11/02: Iraqi roulette
09/06/02: O'Reilly the wrong 'Factor' in Saudi abduction case
09/05/02: State's war on Americans
08/09/02: White House wants replace 'Visa Express' genius with woman accused of not helping free kidnapped American kids in Arab lands
07/23/02: Visas for suspected terrorists?
07/11/02: VISA EXPRESS DERAILED
07/03/02: Saudis Fueling Mideast Terrorism
07/02/02: Dick Gephardt, Wannabe Deadbeat Son
06/26/02: Open door for terrorists still open
06/17/02: Open Door for Saudi Terrorists
06/11/02: Sacrificing liberty and safety
05/29/02: Coddling Castro
05/20/02: GOP running from social security reform?
05/09/02: Arab (sky) High Culture
04/24/02: Catholic Church's real challenge
04/17/02: How do you say 'media-bias' in Hebrew?
04/09/02: Sexually Explicit "Abstinence" Education?
04/09/02: A price on the heads of Americans overseas
04/02/02: Bush's New Version of Compartmentalization
03/25/02: Homosexuality a Factor in Sex Abuse by Priests
03/20/02: Government's "Candid Cameras"
03/14/02: Happy Abortionist Appreciation Day
03/07/02: Let dissent ring
03/04/02: Is Ted Kennedy a racist?
02/26/02: The Audacity to Be Black and Conservative

© 2003, Joel Mowbray. Adapted from the February 24 issue of National Review