Blaming the West — again

http://www.JewishWorldReview.com | Environmental groups last week gave new meaning to the old slogan "reuse and recycle." In the aftermath of the tsunami disaster, many were spotted trying to capitalize on the headlines to call attention to their old saws on climate change.

The controversy was catalyzed by a series of quotes like one from a Greenpeace spokesman, who said an increase in "so-called natural disasters [was] no more natural than a plastic Christmas tree."

Similar talk has been heard from other eco groups, though they always clarify that they don't mean the earthquake in the Indian Ocean was caused by global warming, er, exactly. The message instead is worse: Poor countries are unwise to aspire to join the industrialized world, and their "natural" disasters are a comeuppance for buying into the desirability of economic progress.

By developing along their coastlines, for instance, villagers of Thailand and Indonesia allegedly destroyed nature's best defenses against tsunamis — coral reefs and natural tidebreaks in the form of shoreline plants. Hotels and shrimp farms that bring revenue to the poorer coastal communities, you see, are accomplices of nature's destructive power. Now aren't you sorry you didn't listen to us?

This is not a new argument ginned up just for the occasion, however. Last August, an environmental group sued the Indonesian government after a river flooded parts of North Sumatra, killing 200 people. Illegal logging of protected woodlands was blamed for exposing villagers to unnecessary danger. The 2002 landslides in Kenya that drove hundreds of thousands out of their homes were similarly blamed on deforestation.

The message this chorus sends to poor countries is that they should eschew the businesses that involve Western capital and trade. Funny how completely it ignores the evidence and their own human experience. Development may have costs, but it undoubtedly leaves people better off. Wealth buys longer life, better health and a cleaner, better-protected environment. Coral reefs may save lives in a tsunami. But they don't save nearly as many lives as technology and development do.

There was a time, recall, that when most natural disasters were unsurvivable and unpredictable — they came without warning and wiped out whole swaths of communities. In 1959, floods in China killed 2 million. As recently as 1970, 300,000 died in floods in Bangladesh. But natural disasters that hit the developed world seldom even make the list anymore. The Lisbon earthquake killed an estimated 30,000, but that was in 1755.

Environmentalists have correctly noted that 96 percent of death from natural disasters now occurs in the developing world, and that poor, Caribbean countries suffer far worse death and injury from the same hurricanes that also batter Florida. Yet somehow they conclude this is the fault of the developed world for being developed, not a sign that poor countries would be better off if they developed, too.

The World Wildlife Fund once even proposed an income redistribution scheme to compensate poor countries for natural disasters "caused" by industrialized countries. "If the U.S. tobacco industry can be held responsible for smoking-related deaths and illnesses and ordered to pay very hefty fines, wealthy countries must be held responsible in some way for the contribution that their carbon pollution is almost certainly making to recent droughts and floods," said the fund's Jennifer Morgan.

At the heart of many environmentalists' complaint is the belief that the United States is somehow responsible for everything. But happily, no part of the world is less impressed with this message than the corner of the world where the tsunami landed. The economies of Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia and even (despite its civil war) Sri Lanka have not earned the title "tigers" for nothing.

In fact, the most hopeful theme from the morass of appalling news this week is that the tsunami region would not likely suffer long-term economic damage. Local stock markets were barely fazed by the disaster. Globalization is too entrenched. The tourists will come back, and because they will, the capital will be available to rebuild hotels and resorts. Their labor forces remain educated, disciplined and ambitious, so factories will be rebuilt to take advantage of their energies.

For those who survived the tragedy, globalization itself will be one of the biggest forces contributing to their rapid recovery from the disaster. Now if only the environmentalists could figure this out, too.

JWR contributor Collin Levey is a weekly op-ed columnist at the Seattle Times. Before joining the Times in September 2003, she was an editorial writer and editor for The Wall Street Journal. Comment by clicking here.

12/20/04: The real stakes in the judge wars
12/13/04: Military's stop-loss policy unwise, counterproductive
11/18/04: Damning the Scouts
10/29/04: Chaos seekers put on notice by the Supremes
10/22/04: It's about terrorism, John, not testosterone levels
10/15/04: Can America handle Dems' ‘If we lose we will sue’ tactic?
10/05/04: Old Dem pick-up lines aren't working on women
09/24/04: Plagued by strategic madness
09/09/04: Kerry's coercive economic patriotism threat to U.S. firms, global prosperity
09/02/04: GOP did put its on its best face — true American heroes
08/26/04: The wink-wink world of campaign-finance laws
08/19/04: Big picture doesn't justify charter-school foes' glee
08/12/04: Getting to the root of the stem-cell debate
08/05/04: This band of brothers has a different view of Kerry
07/30/04: Putting a lid on the loose lips of Teresa Heinz Kerry
07/08/04: Presidential contest is shaping up as a battle of professional archetypes
06/25/04: Could Nader help the Dems?
06/17/04: Odd man out: Al Gore's journey into irrelevance
06/10/04: A chance to settle down and see where we are