Jewish World Review Jan. 9, 2003 / 6 Shevat, 5763
Bag this boondoggle: The V-22 Osprey would hurt our national defense
The Marine Corps must decide soon whether to fish or cut bait on the V-22
Osprey. For the sake of our Marines, our national defense and our
long-suffering taxpayers, I hope they cut bait.
The tilt-rotor Osprey can take off and land like
a helicopter, but fly like an airplane, because the
rotors at the end of each wing tilt forward to act
The Osprey promised to go farther and faster
than any helicopter in military history. The
Marine Corps should be commended for its boldness in taking risks on the
But technology does not always keep its promises. And boldness, which is
good, can ossify into stubbornness, which is not. Real world experience
indicates that the tilt-rotor is a technology whose time has not yet come.
Thanks to the "vortex ring state," it may never come.
The vortex ring state was the culprit in a crash in Arizona in April 2000 that
killed 19 Marines. An Osprey was at about 300 feet when it suddenly flipped
over and plunged into the ground. When another Osprey crashed in
December, flight testing was suspended until May 2002.
The vortex ring state is a wing-induced rotor stall unique to tilt-rotors. Carlton
Meyer, a former Marine who edits the Web site G2Mil.com, explains: "As a
tilt-rotor descends vertically, each wing pushes the airflow away from half its
rotor. The faster it descends, the greater the vacuum the wings create,
resulting in less lift. As the pilots maneuver a V-22, they may shift the airflow
causing one rotor to lose so much lift that it literally falls and flips the aircraft
A skilled pilot can avoid the vortex ring state by descending slowly; by not
going straight down, and by not making sudden maneuvers during descent.
This would be fine if the Osprey were to be used for commuter flights. But for
a Marine assault force approaching a landing zone which has turned "hot,"
coming in slow and straight can be hazardous to health.
The vortex ring state can be avoided if the Osprey descends no faster than
800 feet per minute. But most military helicopters can descend safely at 2,000
feet per minute.
And because they don't have to worry about flipping over if they juke and
weave, conventional helicopters can take evasive action to avoid enemy fire.
The Osprey has two other problems. There are no door gunners, because the
tilt rotors on the end of the wings would block much of a gunner's view and
his field of fire. And the V-22's small rotors kick up substantial "downwash,"
kicking up clouds of dust thick enough to impair a pilot's vision, and forcing
dismounting Marines to lie flat on the deck until the Osprey has departed the
The Osprey costs a great deal more than other helicopters that perform the
same missions, so even if the safety problems are solved, the Osprey's
performance must be a great deal better to justify buying it. It isn't.
The Osprey can cruise at 240 knots, about 40 percent faster than the
helicopters it is supposed to replace, the CH-46E Sea Knight and the
CH-53E Super Stallion. Its range (515 nautical miles) is considerably greater
than that of the Sea Knight (132 nautical miles), but less than that of Super
Stallion (540 nautical miles), or the Navy's new MH-60S "Nighthawk"
helicopter when it is equipped with external fuel tanks.
Boeing claims the Osprey can lift 15,000 pounds externally, but it has yet to
lift more than 11,000 pounds in tests. The CH-46 could lift 10,000 pounds
when it was new. The CH-53 can lift 28,000 pounds vertically. The Osprey
can carry 24 combat-loaded Marines, same as the CH-46.
The Osprey weighs as much as a Super Stallion, and is much more likely to
tip over in a choppy sea. The Osprey burns fuel at twice the rate of the Sea
Knight, and breaks down more often than does that 35-year-old-helicopter.
The defense budget for this fiscal year calls for purchase of 11 Ospreys at
$120 million each. This compares with a cost of $25 million each for the
Nighthawk, and an estimated cost of $21 million each to extend the life of the
You don't need to be an engineer or a tactician to realize the Marines would
be better off with a mixture of MH-60s and CH-53s than with the Osprey.
You only need to be able to do arithmetic.
Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Comment on JWR contributor Jack Kelly's column by clicking here.
01/07/03: Another Korean war?
12/26/02: Learning from Canada's economic suicide
12/24/02: A moral dilemma: Support a vicious fascist dictator or the poor and downtrodden?
12/20/02: Time to tell the truth: The great movement of blacks to the Democratic Party took place for economic reasons, not because of civil rights
12/18/02: Nothing better illustrates Trent Lott's unfitness for the post of Senate
Majority Leader than his desperate efforts to cling to it
12/16/02: Debunker mentality: It's hard work not seeing ties between Iraq and al-Qaida
12/12/02: GOP ideologues turning on Lott --- better sacrifice the leader than the party
12/06/02: Curing our democracy of afflictions
12/02/02: Conscription, like the horse cavalry, is an artifact of a bygone time
11/27/02: What Saddam faces
11/25/02: Why war with Iraq can be averted
11/19/02: A draft would harm the military
11/12/02: The 2002 elections and Nixon
11/07/02: Democratic overreaction to our recent "cosmically important" election
10/30/02: Show North Korea we're serious: Polish off Saddam
10/22/02: The squealing in the Pentagon is a proof of Rummy's effectiveness
10/16/02: The tactical challenge we face
10/10/02: Silence more despicable than seditious noise
10/08/02: Bu$h and the bu$ine$$ of war
10/01/02: Gore's calculated risk may well get him the Dems' nomination
09/25/02: Schroeder may find the fruits of victory sour
09/25/02: Making Saddam change his spots
09/19/02: Bush's resolve already has paid dividends
09/17/02: Courageous Iranians
09/13/02: If you never served in the military, you have no right to an opinion
09/10/02: Why the 'air marshals' will fail
09/05/02: Resurrecting the "Happy Darky"
08/31/02: Are Bush's inactions against Iraq calculated?
08/23/02: Dems can't take the minority vote for granted any longer
08/20/02: No proof of Saddam's wrongdoing? Yeah, right
08/15/02: Mineta's war on what?
08/13/02: When Gore said he wanted to be his 'own man,' what was he thinking!?
08/08/02: Picking a tree for Cheney's hanging
08/06/02: Fears about the Department of Homeland Security are misplaced
08/01/02: The greatest strategic deception since Eisenhower convinced Hitler the Allies were going to land at the Pas de Calais?
07/30/02: State Dept.'s anti-American actions
07/26/02: Journalists are making sure Americans can't differentiate between the stock market and the economy
07/23/02: Iran's is on the verge of a social and political explosion. So why is media ignoring it?
07/17/02: FBI isn't supposed to stand for Foolish, Blind and Incompetent
07/12/02: The ICC tramples on rights Americans take for granted
07/09/02: Was LA International Airport shooting, in fact, good news?
07/02/02: What the "intelligence community" can learn from Alexander the Great
06/28/02: Muslim link in Oklahoma City bombing revisited
06/25/02: A good environmental scare needs two ingredients - an impending catastrophe, and someone to blame for it
06/21/02: Stirring the security pot
06/18/02: Why the military is so messed up
06/14/02: Vast majority $68.7 billion proposed for weapons will be spent on systems of little use in the war on terror
06/12/02: Bush saw them and raised them, and he's holding the aces
06/10/02: Some heads need to roll
06/04/02: A new draft for the 'war on terror'?
05/31/02: So the FBI has finally caught up to our priorities?
05/29/02: Taking on common sense
05/23/02: Political terrorists
05/21/02: There is a great deal to fret about, but I've never been more optimistic
05/15/02: If there is a way for America to lose the war, Gen. Tommy Franks can find it
05/13/02: Impartial justice against Americans by the UN?
05/07/02: Want to win the 'war on terror'? Reinstate the draft
05/03/02: An expanded NATO is needed as a counterweight to the UN and the EU
04/29/02: Islamic 'smarts'
04/26/02: Did Bush play his Aces with Abdullah wisely?
04/23/02: Why peace in the Mideast is closer than ever
04/19/02: What the Arabs of Gaza and the West Bank gained from the "peace accords"
04/17/02: Logical Muslim allies
04/10/02: How to guarantee an infinite Mideast war
04/08/02: Saddam's American friends
04/05/02: Arab winners and sinners
04/01/02: Why is the commander of U.S. Central Command not coming clean to the American people?
03/31/02: Dubya under attack … by conservatives
03/26/02: Saddam watch coming to an end?
03/21/02: Get the Jews!
03/19/02: It's time pols and gov bureaucrats be held to the same
standard of accountability we insist for corporate execs
03/15/02: Khaki Throat
03/12/02: Making foreign cheaters pay
03/08/02: Timidity and indecision by senior American commanders
03/04/02: Why 9-11? Ex-CIA officials come clean
02/25/02: Don't rule out a quick victory --- even if prez says otherwise
02/21/02: Saving our military from itself
02/19/02: Front Page fiction
02/15/02: Our European allies are like the fat kid who wants to play quarterback
02/13/02: Is the Army in danger of becoming "irrelevant"?
02/11/02: So, I "propagate hatred" …
02/06/02: Bush whacking the media
02/04/02: Why serious folks disregard the European Union --- and why Bush must, too
01/30/02: Give economy pneumonia in order to protect it from a cold
01/28/02: Media is its own worst enemy
01/25/02: Journalists making road to peace a bumpy ride, or: A case study in stupidity
01/23/02: Toward a stronger defense at a lower cost
01/21/02: How Bush could be Generations X and Y's Kennedy ... and guarantee a GOP victory in the midterm elections
© 2002, Jack Kelly