Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review April 19, 2001 / 26 Nissan, 5761

James K. Glassman

Jim Glassman
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

The Bush Budget --
PRESIDENT BUSH’S first budget is impressive, reasonable, and utterly unsurprising -- in other words, exactly what you would expect from listening to the compassionate-conservative themes of his campaign. If he were the right-wing ideologue many critics claim, he would have slashed spending at departments like Education and Housing & Urban Development. Instead, those are the departments that get the two biggest increases. He hikes the Pentagon’s budget modestly, and he becomes the first president in memory to propose cutting “corporate welfare” programs, including the Export-Import Bank and shipbuilding and auto subsidies.

As a fiscal conservative, Bush proposes reducing the debt owed by the government to the public by $2 trillion over ten years -- which essentially retires all the federal bonds that can be retired. Of the remaining $3.6 trillion in surpluses, he wants to use about half to reduce taxes and a big chunk ($153 billion) of the rest to establish a prescription-drug benefit for Medicare. And the budget meets another campaign promise: guaranteeing the benefits of current Social Security beneficiaries (all 46 million of them), while reforming the program.

For fiscal 2002 (which begins Oct. 1, 2001), Bush wants the federal government to spend just under $2 trillion -- an increase of $104 billion, or 5.6 percent, over the current year. Those are big numbers, not easy to grasp. But think of them this way: With 100 million households in the U.S., federal spending comes to $20,000 per family -- an increase of about $1,000 over spending during the current fiscal year.

As president, Bush tells Congress how he wants to divide up the money, but the legislators draw up the laws that direct the spending. The majority of spending is “mandatory” -- that is, determined by strict rules laid out in laws passed long ago, governing, for example, Social Security, Medicare and farm programs. The rest is “discretionary” -- or adjustable year to year. Total discretionary spending per family is about $6,600, of which $3,100 goes for defense. The most impressive part of the Bush budget is that it holds this discretionary spending to an increase of 4 percent (or $250 per family) -- compared with increases averaging more than 6 percent for the past three years. He manages that increase by raising some programs and lowering others. The budget puts his political and philosophical priorities on display.

Three of the four departments getting the largest increases can be characterized as “social” -- in the past, the darlings of Democrats, not Republicans. The Education Department gets the biggest hike of all -- 11.5 percent. The budget at HUD would rise 6.7 percent; and at Health & Human Services, 5.2 percent, thanks mainly to a record $2.8 billion increase in spending at the National Institutes of Health, which searches for cures to cancer, AIDs and other diseases. Bush also provides full funding for such programs as WIC, which serves the nutritional needs of 7.3 million women, infants and children a month, and the Land and Water Conservation Fund (at $900 million). He triples funding for the Reading First Initiative ($975 million); doubles the number of people served under the Community and Migrant Health Centers program; offers $24 billion over five years for the health of underinsured kids and $46 billion for drugs for vulnerable seniors.

Yes, many programs beloved by Democrats are being trimmed -- no surprise at a time when Republicans control the White House and Congress. Spending to save the world’s tropical forests has been cut from $100 million to $13 million, and the Wetlands Reserve program of the Agriculture Department is zeroed out. Still, under the Bush plan, the Environmental Protection Agency’s spending would be $56 million higher than President Clinton’s last budget request. Bush’s budget director, Mitch Daniels, said he tried to reduce or eliminate programs that weren’t working and transfer funds to those that were. In keeping with the administration’s style, the overall changes -- other than the double-digit increase for education -- have been modest.

Take the Pentagon. While details for the military budget won’t be completed until next month, the president’s outline calls for significant increases in military pay and benefits, as he promised during the campaign, but $3 billion cut in weapons purchases. Overall, the military budget rises 4.8 percent. Meanwhile, the international-affairs part of the budget gets a 5.5 percent hike.

Making this sensible budget a reality will not be easy for the president. After a drought of nearly a decade, the tide of spending has been rising recently -- and the reason is not hard to fathom. Thanks to a flood of tax revenues into Washington, politicians at last have money to spend. In Clinton’s last budget year, spending rose an incredible 8.6 percent -- or about six percentage points more than inflation. By setting aside half the surplus for Social Security and most of the remainder for debt retirement and tax cuts, Bush leaves little for wasteful spending. That’s a smart move. Economically and politically savvy, moderate and compassionate, this is the best budget to be delivered to Capitol Hill in at least a decade.

JWR contributor James K. Glassman is the host of Tech Central Station. Comment by clicking here.


04/12/01: To revive The New Economy, release a chokehold --- break up the Bells
04/04/01: Even as stocks have fallen, the Net keeps booming
03/28/01: Where’s The Profit In Biotech Future?
03/22/01: The Joy of Debt: The last thing we should want is a U.S. Treasury flush with cash
03/19/01: 'Defensive' Stocks in the NASDAQ
03/15/01: Bush administration must say no to Jane and Kyoto
03/08/01: Time to buy small caps? Consider these five great techs
03/01/01: Bill’s and Larry’s continued political adventures
02/26/01: Chips on the Dips?
02/23/01: How Tauzin Can Keep His Word And Stop Telecom "Remonopolization"
02/13/01: Consumers, WAKE UP! Middlemen are ripping you off
02/02/01: Publicity-Seeking Politicians and Contingency-Fee Lawyers Corrupt the Law
01/26/01: DoubleClick, eBay And Their Promising Ilk
01/24/01: Will Cyberspace Look Like France or America?
12/27/00: Cut interest, taxes and regulation to save high-tech economy
12/20/00: Close, But No Big Czar
12/15/00: A Down Year? Maybe. But Let’s Put It in Perspective
12/13/00: Clinton’s sorry midnight race into history
12/07/00: Is Telecom’s Future The Bells, The Bells, and Only The Bells?
12/01/00: Money talks and walks in election aftermath
11/29/00: Climate Treaty Deadlock Shows Lack of Consensus and Common Sense
11/23/00: Climate change participants don’t listen to reasons for uncertainty
11/21/00: Will Regulators Create a Recession?
11/14/00: The Election and the Market
10/26/00: Hang on for the long term
10/25/00: On privacy, one size doesn’t fit all
10/24/00: Perish the bearish thought
10/19/00: Beating hunger --- the biggest prize
10/13/00: Way to play biotech
10/12/00: Bush vs. Gore on Technology
10/11/00: Global Climate Scare: Fools Rush In
10/05/00: Avoid the Apple Trap
10/03/00: Goodbye, anti-Microsoft crusader --- and good riddance
09/29/00: Should You Invest in Tech IPOs?
09/27/00: Could technology end airline delays?
09/22/00: Don’t Forget Small Caps
09/20/00: Is the New York Times Rooting for Disaster?
09/13/00: The Best Argument Against Net Regulation
08/30/00: Political Risk in Big Drug Stocks
07/27/00: Tech Dividends
07/25/00: Government Privacy Violators
07/20/00: If I Had to Pick One Tech Stock
07/18/00: Our Favorite Lawsuit
07/13/00: Silicon Valley East
07/11/00: Election 2000: Year of the Investor Class?
07/07/00: Adventures on the
07/06/00:The Difference Between Bill Gates and Larry Ellison
06/29/00: In the Chips
06/27/00: Free market wins in Federal Court!
06/22/00: Wireless Bargains?
06/20/00: Is Your SUV Warming the Planet?
06/15/00: Shopping for Government
06/13/00: Top 10 Tech Stocks
06/08/00: Riding the eBook Wave
06/06/00: "The Last Mile"
06/02/00: Keep Buying!
05/31/00: Who Asked the FTC to Regulate Online Privacy?
05/25/00: "When It’s Time to Sell"
05/23/00: End the "Telephone Tax"
05/16/00: Time Warner Gets a Bad Rap

© 2000, Tech Central Station