Clicking on banner ads keeps JWR alive
Jewish World Review July 8, 1999 /25 Tamuz, 5759

Linda Chavez

Linda Chavez
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Tony Snow
Michael Barone
Dave Barry
Kathleen Parker
Dr. Laura
Michael Kelly
Bob Greene
Michelle Malkin
Paul Greenberg
David Limbaugh
David Corn
Marianne Jennings
Sam Schulman
Philip Weiss
Mort Zuckerman
Richard Chesnoff
Larry Elder
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Don Feder
Linda Chavez
Mona Charen
Thomas Sowell
Walter Williams
Ben Wattenberg


Is INS taking its
cues from Seinfeld? -- BECOMING A U.S. CITIZEN has never been more difficult, or so it appears, judging from recent denial rates for immigrants wishing to become naturalized Americans.

Some 1.8 million immigrants are awaiting naturalization, but increasing numbers of them won't make the grade. Denials are up 251 percent nationwide in the first six months of 1999, and more than 56,000 applicants in Los Angeles alone were denied during this period. Why? The answer for hundreds of them sounds more like a "Seinfeld" episode re-run than what you would expect from the nation's Immigration and Naturalization Service.

Like the fictional Babu Bhatt, the peripatetic Pakistani character on Seinfeld who was deported thanks to a undelivered INS letter, several hundred immigrants ran afoul of the INS recently when they didn't receive official notifications that they were to appear for INS hearings. It seems the INS simply mailed notifications to the wrong addresses. When applicants failed to appear for their required interview, the INS automatically denied them citizenship.

Typical of this group is Yelena Tarashchanskaya, a 70-year-old Ukranian refugee who came to the United States 10 years ago. "Every morning for years, I checked my mail to see if there was anything new on my citizenship application. But I never found anything. I just could not understand what was going on," she recently told the Los Angeles Times. Tarashchanskaya didn't even know she had been denied citizenship until a social worker went to the L.A. district office of the INS to inquire what had happened to the request. The INS sent the denial letter to the wrong address, too.

The INS admits it hasn't done a good job updating applicants' addresses, but spokesmen claim the problem only affects a few hundred people. In response, the INS plans to institute a new toll-free telephone number where applicants can automatically log in address changes.
The agency also is considering whether to modify the existing citizenship test, which critics -- including some in the INS-- claim is too difficult. But the problem with the test isn't its inherent difficulty but the arbitrary and inconsistent manner in which the INS administers the test.

Three years ago, the Center for Equal Opportunity (where I am president) surveyed the 33 INS district offices to determine how each administered the U.S. history and government test that is required to become a naturalized citizen. The test is comprised of questions chosen from among 100 recommended by the INS, which include questions like "Who was the first president of the United States?" and "Who makes the laws of the United States?" to trickier ones like "Which countries were our enemies during World War II?" or "Who elects the president?"

(The correct answer to the former includes Italy in addition to Germany and Japan, and to the latter, the electoral college, not merely the people.)

CEO found that INS district officials were free to administer the test pretty much as they saw fit, without oversight from the INS headquarters. In practical terms, that meant an applicant in Seattle could be required to answer correctly eight of 16 questions on an oral test, while an applicant in Chicago was required to answer correctly six of 10 questions on a written exam. What was worse, district officials were often the sole arbiters of what qualified as a correct answer, allowing considerable latitude to individual examiners.

CEO found similar difficulties with respect to the English language requirement for naturalization. Although the law requires all applicants who are under 50 years of age and have lived 20 years in the United States to demonstrate the ability to speak, read and write simple English, INS district offices varied widely in their application of this standard. Some offices penalized applicants who were fluent but had heavy accents; others passed applicants who spoke virtually no English.

Applicants for U.S. citizenship have every right to expect that the government agency charged with administering naturalization be fair and efficient. But no one should expect the test to be easy. The INS would better serve everyone if it concentrated on reforming its administrative practices instead of revising its citizenship test.


07/01/99: How to put doctors and patients back in control of medical-care decisions
06/24/99: Thou shall go postal
06/15/99: Unraveling of social order not limted to U.S.
06/09/99: Stand by your ma'am?
06/04/99: An answered prayer
05/25/99: When higher-education is taken prisoner
05/18/99: Are Jefferson's kin snobs and racists?
05/12/99: First-hand encounter with Chinese paranoia
05/06/99: Singer of Death
04/27/99: Beyond 'Why?'
04/23/99: Pick your ('protected-class' poison)
04/14/99: Why we’re a nation of procrastinators
04/06/99: How to spend Equal Pay Day
03/30/99: Are euthanasia advocates truly compassionate or do they merely fear being burdens themselves?
03/27/99: Time for the ‘Real Thing’?
03/16/99: How to keep anti-immigrant sentiments low
03/11/99: Why Bush is the GOP front-runner
03/03/99: If only these were normal times
02/24/99: Unsettling news about ‘feminism’ --- for the NOW gang
02/18/99: 50 years and trillions of dollars up in smoke --- literally?
02/11/99: Why Dems have the most to fear
02/02/99: Look who supports a people-of-color tax
01/26/99: When sports are truly a diversion
01/20/99: Ken Starr as Mark Fuhrman?
01/12/99: Leave Monica out of it
01/05/99: Forget Danny Williams, what about Bubba’s trade and campaign abuses!?
12/29/98: Ya never know
12/15/98: Whose reality?
12/08/98: Why the House must make sure Bubba gets his due punishment
12/02/98: Remember when libraries were for expanding the mind!?
11/26/98: When Thanksgiving means more than commercialism
11/17/98: To Ken S. --- if you'll only listen
11/10/98: What did you expect?
11/04/98: Shame on those who don't vote!
10/27/98: It's spreading!
10/20/98: It ain't over yet
10/15/98: Mourning motherhood
9/23/98: Sosa and the race card
9/23/98: Believable and truthful are two different things
9/16/98: Time for a new Amendment!
9/08/98: When silence is truly golden
8/25/98: Bears and blunders
8/25/98: Only consistency about Prez's anti-terrorism policy: its inconsistency
8/18/98: Is our 'broken-compass' beyond fixing?
8/11/98: Reno's risk
8/04/98: When Truth is of the highest odor
7/28/98: No way to protect ourselvesagainst a nut's wrath
7/22/98: These 'choice' advocates are being demonzied ... by the Left.
7/15/98: Will 'neonaticide' become the new buzzword?
7/07/98: Urge to mega-merge, stopped in time
6/30/98: Why take responsibility if
somebody else will pay?
6/23/98: Blinded by the red, or is it the green?
6/17/98: Flotsam in the wake of romance
6/10/98: We have a ways to go in the bilingual war
6/3/98: Tyson's triumph over tragedy
5/28/98: Why Univision's Perenchio is out to hurt his fellow Hispanics
5/20/98: Sometimes Buba actually tells the truth ... as he sees it
5/12/98: Chill-out on the chihuahua and ... Seinfeld
5/8/98: The revolution is just about over
4/28/98: Let's face it: both parties are full of hypocrites
4/21/98: Legislating equality
4/14/98: One down, many to go
4/7/98: Mexican mayhem?
3/31/98: Of death and details
3/25/98: Americans are unaware of NATO expansion
3/18/98: Intellectual-ghettoes in the name of diversity
3/11/98: Be careful what you wish for ...
3/4/98: The Press' Learning-disability
2/25/98: 50 States Are Enough!
2/18/98: Casey at the Mat
2/11/98: The legal profession's Final Solution
2/4/98: Faith and the movies
1/28/98: Clinton, Lewinsky, and Politics Vs. Principle
1/21/98: Movement on the Abortion Front
1/14/98: Clones, Courts, and Contradictions
1/7/98: Child custody or child endangerment?
12/31/97: Jerry Seinfeld, All-American
12/24/97: Affirmative alternatives: New initiatives for equal opportunity are out there
12/17/97: Opening a window of opportunity (a way out of bilingual education for California's Hispanic kids)

©1999, Creators Syndicate