Jewish World Review July 16, 1999 /3 Av, 5759
The dubious pleasures of political pandering
IT TAKES A LOT OF MORAL FIBER to resist a seduction. Saying no to those who
flatter our vanity and appeal to our desire to be loved and wanted takes
more discipline than most of us have - especially, it seems, when it comes
to politicians trying to seduce American Jews.
Having privately resolved to do my best to ignore Hillary Rodham Clinton's
descent on New York, I am forced to go back on my word upon reading some of
her latest statements intended to prove how devoted a supporter of Israel
she has always been.
The same woman who gratuitously endorsed a Palestinian Arab state last year
now tells us that she wants to move America's embassy to Jerusalem, "the
eternal and indivisible capital of Israel."
Hillary's recitation of the Zionist catechism on Jerusalem is, of course, a
delightfully hilarious piece of political theater.
WHITE HOUSE FIBS
While it doesn't take much imagination to suppose that Mr. and Mrs. Clinton
have had an argument or two in their time, does anyone really think the
"White House and First Lady Are at Odds Over Jerusalem" as The New York
Times screamed in a headline last Friday? Talk about spinning the media!
From patron of the Palestinians, has Hillary been transformed into heroine
of the Jews? It was enough to prompt her close pal Suha Arafat (wife to
Palestinian leader Yasser) to denounce her.
All the Times had to do was to check out all the weasel words included in
her public letter to the head of the Orthodox Union to understand that
there was little, if any, conflict between Hillary's stand and that of the
Like many a tawdry seduction, Hillary's statement was demeaning, both to
its audience and to the first lady herself. As with any common pol on the
hustings, Monica's victim feels the need to pander to the Jewish vote in
the manner she feels we are most vulnerable.
After all, she has already fibbed about something more sacred than foreign
policy. She's even prepared to pretend to be a Yankees fan to convince New
Yorkers that she's one of them.
Among the many ironies to be found in this story is the fact that many
serious political observers doubted that Hillary's Palestinian-state gaffe
would affect her chances to be a U.S. Senator from New York. Few doubted
that liberal Jewish Democrats would support her, no matter what she said.
Despite a shaky record on Israel issues, she has close ties to the Jewish
community that stem from her stands on domestic issues.
That's why, despite the controversy, she is being honored by Hadassah at a
Washington dinner later this month. Some are protesting that event, but
anyone who thinks that a national Jewish organization would turn down the
chance to have a box-office draw like Hillary at a fundraising dinner
understands nothing about Jewish life.
Although I understand why a politician like Hillary Clinton would feel the
need to pander to Jewish voters, the more important question to consider is
why so many of us seem willing to lap up whatever nonsense candidates throw
Pandering is a sign of political respect. If candidates didn't want our
votes and our money, they wouldn't bother seducing us. It would be
self-defeating, as well as undemocratic, to discourage attempts to win our
But after 50 years of false pledges to move the embassy to Jerusalem, maybe
it's time to take a new tack on that issue.
THE DOLE PANDER
A case in point would be the pandering that lies behind much of the current
brouhaha over the U.S. embassy in Israel.
In 1995, Kansas Republican Sen. Bob Dole was preparing his run for the
presidency in 1996. Up to that point, he had never been considered an
especially ardent friend of Israel. Yet, it was Bob Dole who introduced a
bill which required that the embassy be moved within four years. It was
passed over the objections of his rival, President Clinton. Though the
president was given an escape clause (which Clinton has used), the bill
gave the embassy campaign a boost at a time when it needed it. At the time,
some thought it might even help the embassy move become a reality.
Did the Dole pander work? Given the disastrous results in November 1996,
you would have to say no, since the Kansan did as poorly among Jewish
voters as the much-despised President George Bush did in 1992. On the other
hand, the Jerusalem bill did help Dole raise an awful lot of Jewish money
in that campaign.
TAKING THE CLINTON ABSTINENCE PLEDGE
Bill Clinton himself used the Jerusalem issue to pander to the Jews in
1992. Clinton played the Zionist to adoring Jewish crowds and took the
Jerusalem pledge, as virtually every other nonincumbent presidential
candidate has done in the past 50 years.
Perhaps the only thing new under the political sun is the fact that GOP
presidential front-runner Texas Gov. George W. Bush has so far refused to
make the Jerusalem promise. It appears to be a sign of his complete lack of
interest in Jewish votes or issues. But at least he isn't trying to lie to
All of which leads me to propose something new for American Jews to
consider as the 2000 presidential and congressional campaigns begin.
Call it the Clinton abstinence pledge.
Let American Jews resolve to listen to no more lying promises about the
Jerusalem embassy or any other standard pander line. When you hear
candidates raise the issue, run the other way! Let them run on their deeds,
if any, not on their promises of future favor.
Let's keep our much-tarnished honor. Tell the candidates we don't want
their love, just their
JWR contributor Jonathan S. Tobin is executive editor of the Philadelphia Jewish Exponent. Let him know what you think by clicking here.
07/12/99: Summer Stories: The Devil Is in the Details
07/02/99: The Elusive Search For Editorial Balance
06/25/99:Who Changed the Rules?: Among American Jews, it's getting harder to tell the difference between mainstream and marginal
06/11/99: Choosing the Jewish Future:
The question is: What kind of a Jewish community do we really want?
06/11/99: Small Stories With Important Conclusions
06/04/99: Local Heroes Wanted: Taking Hebrew School Seriously
05/28/99: Kosovo's Chicken Hawks and Cluster Bombs
05/19/99: Not to Bibi: Netanyahu's Downfall Is His Own Doing
05/13/99: The search for Jews in outer space continues
05/10/99: Cheering From the Sidelines:
American Jews are more than interested observers of Israel's election
05/05/99: Perilous Diplomacy: Palestinians Want To Go Back To 1947
04/30/99: Politically Conservative and Jewish: Not an Oxymoron After All
04/23/99: Notes From the Home Front
04/16/99: The Sporting Jews: Making America's Game Our Own
04/09/99: From Silence to Cacophony: Holocaust metaphors are the coin of the realm
04/05/99: A Righteous but Confused Cause:
Kosovo war shines a light on our principles and our hypocrisy
03/19/99:Jewish Art, Jewish Artists: Making beautiful music is no guarantee of goodness
03/17/99: When Jewish Foes Come Together
03/11/99: The Lingering Romance of the Jewish Left: When naming names was a righteous cause
03/05/99: Sacred Cows Make the Best Hamburgers
02/25/99: Changing Our Minds on School Choice
02/18/99: Morality Play: Mixing Politics and Values Is a Tricky Business
02/11/99:Of Human Rights and Wrongs
02/05/99:The Bibiphobia Conspiracy
01/27/99: Israel and Us: Putting Up or Shutting Up
01/20/99: The High Cost of Jewish Education
01/14/99The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: Have American Jews finally arrived?
01/06/99 Israel: The Millennial Theme Park
12/30/98 Memo to Bubba: Israel ain't Monica, keep yer hands off!
12/22/98 Calling Things by Their Right Names
12/12/98 Good news...and bad news
11/05/98 What price free-speech?
10/30/98: Haunted by the past
10/23/98: American Jewry: Ethnicity or faith?
10/15/98: Converts, saints and Jews:
Confronting the story of Edith Stein
10/02/98: Bibi: No Messiah, just a politician
9/11/98: Politics ‘98: By their enemies shall ye know them
9/04/98: Pro-terror groups' cry of discrimination rings hollow
8/28/98: Defending the undefendable;Or, the AJCongress should stop wasting Jewish resources
8/21/98: Is 'Jewish journalism' an oxymoron?
8/14/98: Holding on to our heroes
8/07/98: Three strikes, but they continue to play
7/23/98: Zionist vs Zionist
7/17/98: Summer news stories: Large and small
7/13/98: A step closer to school choice
6/26/98: The Holocaust Museum and Mort Klein
6/12/98: What price Jewish education?
Ten books for a long, hot summer:
A serious vacation reading list for Jewish history lovers
Double standards here and there:
Hypocrisy raises its ugly head in Israel and the U.S.
5/26/98: Hartford Seminary tangle points to bigger issues
5/22/98:The importance of being Bibi
The ‘dream palace' of the anti-Zionists:
Hartford Seminary controversy has historic roots
4/26/98: All-rightniks versus the alarmists:
Focussing on the Jewish bottom line
4/13/98:Of ends and means and victims
4/5/98: Hang up on Albright
3/29/98: Bigshots or activists?: Clinton's three clerics return from China
3/27/98: Will American Jews help Clinton push Israel into a corner?
3/22/98: Anti-Semitism then and now
3/15/98: Still searching for Jews at the opera
3/11/98: Remembering Eric Breindel
3/8/98: Getting lost in history
3/5/98: Follow the money to Hamas
2/22/98: Re-writing "Anne Frank" - A distorted legacy
2/15/98: Religious persecution is still a Jewish issue
2/6/98: A lost cause remembered (the failure of the Bund)
2/1/98: Economic aid is not in Israel's interest
1/25/98: Jews are news, and a fair shake for Israel is hard to find
©1999, Jonathan Tobin