JWR Jeff JacobyBen WattenbergRoger Simon
Mona CharenLinda Chavez

Paul Greenberg Larry ElderJonathan S. Tobin
Thomas SowellMUGGERWalter Williams
Don FederCal Thomas
Political Cartoons
Left, Right & Center

Jewish World Review / Nov. 13, 1998 /24 Mar-Cheshvan, 5759

Cal Thomas

Cal Thomas Supreme Court
upholds freedom of school-choice

WHILE SHELLSHOCKED HOUSE REPUBLICANS wonder what became of their "revolution,'' the Supreme Court has allowed the real revolution to proceed. By a vote of 8-1, the Court refused to block Wisconsin's program that allows poor children to attend the private or religious school of their parent's choice.

The National Education Association, American Civil Liberties Union, People for the American Way and even the NAACP (whose constituents would be helped the most) fought to keep poor children locked in a hopelessly broken school system. They claimed the Wisconsin program violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. Their approach doesn't put people first. It puts institutions first.

The Landmark Legal Foundation, which has successfully defended the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program since 1991, praised the decision as a "watershed victory for education reformers across the nation.'' While the Court's decision was limited to Wisconsin, it is bound to encourage the school-choice movement now percolating in more than half the states. The Court's ruling comes not a moment too soon as fresh evidence of terrible and unrepairable schools continues to pile up.

In Alexandria, Va., figures indicate public school students scored below the state average on each of 27 new exams that eventually determines who graduates and which schools are accredited. Alexandria students on average got 53 percent correct answers on a high school English test. On a world history and geography test they did even worse. Only 34 percent answered the questions properly. Earth science -- 47 percent right answers. The school board chairman, Stephen J. Kenealy, blamed his district's disappointing performance on the large number of poor children, the precise target of school choice, which has been shown to improve test scores as well as behavior and attitude wherever it is tried.

According to a Harvard study of Milwaukee's school-choice program, minority children improved their reading skills by 3 to 5 percentage points and their math skills by 5 to 12 percentage points. The study suggests that, over a prolonged period of time, school choice might reduce the gap between white and minority test scores.

Liberal Democrats, including President Clinton, have blocked all non-public-school choice proposals. They even opposed Sen. Paul Coverdell's (R-Ga.) bill that would have created private-money education savings accounts. That's because they are completely beholden to the education establishment, including the teachers' unions that provide money, votes and political clout but give kids an education inferior to private and home schools.

A look at figures compiled by the House Committee on Education and the Workforce indicates the threat school choice poses to the education bureaucracy. Thirty-nine federal agencies run 760 education programs at a cost of $100 billion a year. Few demonstrate tangible results.

Republican Sen.-elect George Voinovich of Ohio reports that some school administrators in his state spend 50 percent of their time filling out federal forms, despite the fact that federal funds account for just 6 percent of Ohio's education spending. According to the U.S. Department of Education's own Paper Reduction Act, the department requires 48.6 million hours of paperwork, the equivalent of 25,000 employees working full time each year. (This is a department that also spends our money on closed captioning for Jerry Springer's show.)

As few as 65 cents of each education dollar trickle down to the classroom, and even that fails to improve test scores. The other 35 cents go to red tape and bureaucracy.

Competition has improved other products and services. It will improve education, too. But the unions and the politicians who must rely on them to win elections would keep children imprisoned in a failed education system in order to preserve their power.

School choice is working in Milwaukee. It can work everywhere. The Supreme Court seems inclined to let it go forward. Future generations of children will be the beneficiaries. Politically, school choice may help Republicans break the lock Democrats have on minority voters.

Up

11/10/98: The revolting Republican 'revolution'
11/06/98: Hulk Hogan for president?
11/03/98: Clinton's greatest peril isn't Monica
10/30/98: Mother Teresa was right about killing
10/27/98: Clinton to Netanyahu: 'You're despicable'
10/21/98: A 'peace' agreement: Wye not?
10/19/98: Vanity Fair snubs some of the greatest women 'leaders'
10/14/98:The mean machine
10/09/98: Impeachment: an outside perspective
10/07/98: The corruption of the Secret Service
10/02/98: Land erosion in Israel
10/01/98: The race panel: lies in black and white
9/18/98: The Clinton strategy and the Clinton legacy
9/18/98: Stopping him before he sins again
9/15/98: Repenting when the end is near
9/11/98: Faithfully executing: Congress vs. the President
9/10/98: The degrees of separation between Dan Burton and Bill Clinton
9/08/98: Joe Lieberman and the Democrats' conscience
9/04/98: Clinton vs. Reagan and the struggle for power
9/02/98: If only Bubba had been a Boy Scout
8/31/98: Liberal clergy and the Lewinsky affair
8/27/98: Combating the terrorists among us
8/25/98: The president as 'Chicken Little'
8/20/98: That was no apology
8/18/98: Big government's crab grab
8/14/98:Untruths, half-truths and anything but the truth
8/12/98: Lying under oath: past and present impeachable offenses
8/10/98: Endangered species
8/04/98: In search of an unstained president
7/31/98: The UK is ahead of US in one area...
7/28/98: Murder near and far
7/21/98: Telling the truth about
homosexual behavior
7/17/98: One Nation? Indivisible?
7/14/98: Who cares about killing when the 'good times' are rolling?
7/10/98: George W. Bush: a different 'boomer'
7/08/98: My lunch with Roy Rogers
7/06/98: News unfit to print (or broadcast)
6/30/98: Smoke gets in their eyes
6/25/98: Sugar and Spice Girls
6/19/98: William Perry opposed
technology transfers to China
6/19/98: The Clinton hare vs.the Starr tortoise
6/17/98: The President's rocky road to China
6/15/98: Let the children go
6/9/98: Oregon: the new killing fields
6/5/98: Speaking plainly: the cover-up continues
6/2/98: Barry Goldwater: in our hearts
5/28/98:The Speaker's insightful remarks
5/26/98: As bad as it gets
5/25/98:Union dues and don'ts
5/21/98: Connecting those Chinese campaign contribution dots
5/19/98: Clinton on the couch
5/13/98: John Ashcroft: another Jimmy Carter?
5/8/98: Terms of dismemberment
5/5/98: Clinton's tangled Webb
4/30/98: Return of the Jedi
4/28/98: Desparately seeking Susan
4/23/98: RICO's threat to free-speech and expression
4/21/98: Educating children v. preserving an institution
4/19/98: Analyzing the birth of a possible new nation
4/14/98: What's fair about our tax system?
4/10/98: CBS: 'Touched by a perv'
4/8/98: Judge Wright's wrong reasoning on sexual harassment
4/2/98: How about helping American cities before African?
3/31/98:Revenge of the children
3/29/98: The Clinton strategy: delay, deceive, deny, and destroy
3/26/98: Moralist Gary Hart
3/23/98: CNN's century of (liberal) women
3/17/98: Dandy Dan
3/15/98: An imposed 'settlement' settles nothing
3/13/98: David Brock's Turnabout


©1998, Los Angeles Times Syndicate, Inc.