![]() |
Jewish World Review / Nov. 12,1998 /23 Mar-Cheshvan, 5759
![]() |
| Farrakhan |
How should one deal with a Prophet of Rage? Excommunicate him or expose him?
By Nat Hentoff
THE ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE is a useful source of
information about bigotry in all its forms -- not only
antisemitism. But its national director, Abraham Foxman,
sometimes has difficulty understanding that once a
conjugator of hatred is exposed, he should continue to
be illuminated -- in print and on television. That certainly
goes for Minister Louis Farrakhan.
As Justice Louis Brandeis said, "Sunlight is the best
disinfectant." And of all the journalists on the Sunday
morning talk programs, Tim Russert of "Meet the Press" is
by far the most effective interviewer of Farrakhan,
because Russert keeps doing substantial research on that
inflammatory speaker.
As I wrote in this column about an April 1997 Russert
interview with Farrakhan, the host "was not in the least
intimidated by him. . . . Farrakhan had to explain his
cult-like beliefs to a national audience." And Walter
Goodman of the New York Times, writing of the same
program, noted that "Farrakhan was trapped in his own
words."
Yet here come Mr. Foxman and the ADL placing
full-page ads in the New York Times (Oct. 25) and The
Post (Oct. 26) attacking Russert for interviewing
Farrakhan for the third time on "Meet the Press."
Under the headline, "Hate Has Another Outlet, NBC's
"Meet The Press,' " Foxman says: "Interviews such as
yesterday's give unwarranted status to Farrakhan as a
Black leader by giving him an opportunity to propagate
his message of hate which we have all heard before. . . .
Is there no moral responsibility at NBC News any more?"
Alas, Farrakhan continues to have considerable
newsworthy status. He is approaching his goal of moving
into the mainstream of black leadership. Recently, the
Nation of Islam and the NAACP were co-sponsors of a
youth rally in Atlanta.
In June, Martin Luther King III, executive director of the
Southern Christian Leadership Conference, declared that
he intended to reach out to Minister Farrakhan to help
save affirmative action because Farrakhan "commands a
following and has a presence."
Precisely because Farrakhan is gaining more credibility,
it was certainly responsible journalism for Russert to
interview him again.
Obviously, Foxman has every right to miss the point, but
his ad -- in the form of a letter -- is meant to do more. It
is addressed to Bob Wright, president of NBC, with a
copy to Andrew Lack, president of NBC News. In that
letter, Foxman charges that it was "outrageous" for Russert
to feature Farrakhan "as a moral authority on national
issues on such a prestigious program."
Foxman's message to NBC's brass is clear. Impose prior
restraint on Russert.
Furthermore, in view of the fact that the Fred Friendly
standard of courageous television journalism is not quite
what it was at CBS (fronting for Nike at the Olympic
Games) or ABC (recently killing a news story critical of
the Disney empire), Foxman's message goes beyond
NBC. Keep Farrakhan off all the television networks!
Other network talk show hosts may now hesitate over an
invitation to Farrakhan for fear of also being condemned
for "outrageous" irresponsibility.
If Foxman's desire to excommunicate Farrakhan is
fulfilled, he will have greatly benefited that bigot.
Farrakhan's ceaseless penchant for conspiracy theories
will result in a new grand Jewish "conspiracy" to silence
him. And so widely will it reverberate that the following
of the Nation of Islam is likely to grow.
Mr. Farrakhan will have become a First Amendment
martyr. He might even print that phrase on his calling
cards.
Foxman, by the way, accused Russert of not challenging
Farrakhan. As I can attest, when you interview a zealot,
the aim is to enable him to rant on so that he will indeed
be "trapped in his own words." As in the most recent
Russert interview in which Farrakhan revealed to the
nation that Monica Lewinsky is part of a Zionist plot to
entrap the president so that he will stop pressuring
Binyamin Netanyahu.
Earlier this year, "Meet the Press" received the Hubert H.
Humphrey First Amendment Award for "its impact on
the American people's understanding of public affairs."
The award was given by the Anti-Defamation League,
and a signer of the good news was Abraham Foxman.
Included in the award was a resplendent "First
Amendment Freedoms" medal.
If I were Tim Russert, I would send the medal back --
along with the collected First Amendment opinions of
Justice Louis Brandeis, who said, "It is the function of
speech to free men from the bondage of irrational fears."
New JWR contributor Nat Hentoff needs no introduction.
