|
|
|
Jewish World Review August 16, 2000 / 15 Menachem-Av, 5760
 |
http://www.jewishworldreview.com --
JOSEPH LIEBERMAN'S appointment as the Democratic candidate for
vice-president prompted a range of reactions among the Islamists - also known
as fundamentalist Moslems - who run the leading Moslem institutions in the
US. (Moderate Moslems are rarely heard from.)
Their unexpectedly diverse opinions about the nomination of an observant
Jew offer an insight into the fears, hopes, and priorities of the radicals
who speak for American Islam.
Those who reacted badly to Lieberman have two main concerns. They worry,
first, about his further tilting the US government toward Israel. Hussein
Ibish, director of communications for the American Arab Anti-Discrimination
Committee, comments that Lieberman shows a devotion to Israel "unparalleled
in any potential president."
To delegitimate Lieberman, some of these extremists raise the old
dual-loyalty canard. Khalid Turaani, executive director of American Moslems
for Jerusalem, describes the Connecticut senator as having "gone to great
lengths to serve the interests of Israel." Louis Farrakhan, head of the
Nation of Islam, falsely calls Lieberman an Israeli citizen and offensively
asks: "Would he be more faithful to the Constitution of the United States
than to ... the State of Israel?"
Second, the conspiracy-minded Islamists express pure despair at
Lieberman's selection. "Many Moslems are justifiably upset," notes Yahya
Abdul Rahman of the Islamic News and Information Network, an Internet site.
He consoles them by citing the Koran ("Never did We destroy a population
that had not a term decreed and assigned beforehand") and telling them that
however strong the US and Israel may appear, their fall is imminent.
The Jamaat al-Muslimeen International, a Baltimore-based group, sees the
Lieberman nomination as a sign that Jews no longer must control the US from
behind the scenes, but can do so openly; to this, the JMI ominously suggests
that Moslems in America "should study the situation carefully and rethink
their strategies."
Surprisingly, other Islamists find much to like in Lieberman's
appointment, at least in public. They appreciate his having signed up as an
early co-sponsor of a Senate resolution that praises American Moslems and
that endorses false Islamist grievances about "discrimination and harassment"
against American Moslems.
Aly Abuzaakouk, director of the American Moslem Council, deems Lieberman
a "friend of the American Moslem community"; in 1998 his organization even
bestowed its "Abu Saud Award of Excellence" on the senator, to thank him for
his willingness to aid Islamist causes.
Khaled Saffuri, executive director of the Islamic Institute, remembers
Lieberman's having co-hosted (with fourteen other members of Congress) the
first iftar dinner to break the Ramadan fast at the US Capitol. Saffuri finds
that, with the exception of the Arab-Israeli conflict, "he is very
positive... one of the most reasonable senators with their dealings with the
Moslem community."
Likewise, Salam Al-Marayati, director of the Muslim Public Affairs
Council, holds that Al Gore's selection of Lieberman "should be applauded"
because it "would benefit Moslems" by enhancing pluralism in the US.
Translation: this appointment opens doors for Moslems to run for office.
Hebah Abdalla, editor of iviews.com, an Islamist Internet publication,
makes this point more explicitly: yes, the Lieberman appointment "sent shock
waves through the Moslem world," but criticizing Gore "for choosing a member
of another religious minority may some day come back to haunt us." Instead,
Moslems should "commend Gore."
These contrary responses reveal the two main fractures among American
Islamists. First, they are divided in their priorities: Some see the
Arab-Israeli conflict (and other overseas issues, such as Kashmir and Kosovo)
as their primary concern. Others insist that the American Moslem community's
interests come first. The latter worry about Lieberman's views on Israel but
put more emphasis on his friendly policies toward themselves.
Second, Islamists are divided in temperament, with insider types working
the American system and jihadists standing outside it. For the former,
getting invited to the White House stands as one pinnacle of achievement;
another is to get Moslems elected to Congress. The jihadists denounce these
goals as becoming "part of the capitalistic, racist, and imperialist power
structure" which it plans to destroy.
Whatever their differences, however, all Islamists have the same
ambition, which is what they call the "Islamization of America." By this,
they mean no less than saving the US through transforming it into a Moslem
country. However remote the prospect, they believe time is on their side.
And, strange as it sounds, many of them see the Lieberman appointment as a
step closer to that
By Daniel Pipes
JWR contributor Daniel Pipes is director of the Middle East Forum and the author of several books, most recently Conspiracy: How the Paranoid Style Flourishes and Where It Comes from. Let him know what you think by clicking here.
