Jewish World Review May 8, 2003 / 6 Iyar, 5763
In 'enlightened' New England, it hurts to give
There are many words to describe New Englanders. "Generous," it would seem, isn't one of them.
A new study by the Chronicle of Philanthropy shows that when it comes to giving charity, taxpayers in the six New
England states are some of the stingiest people in America. It isn't a new indictment. In a 1998 survey, Massachusetts,
New Hampshire, Connecticut, and Rhode Island were among the five least charitable states in the nation -- despite being
among the wealthiest. In 2000, the Urban Institute's "Generosity Index" put Massachusetts dead last, with most of its
neighbors clustered nearby. On this page in 1997, I wrote about what were then the latest tax statistics on charitable
giving: "When the IRS numbers are ranked by state, New England is invariably at the bottom." At the top, then as now,
were Utah, Wyoming, and much of the Deep South.
In its new study, The Chronicle corrected for variations in the cost of living around the country by calculating charitable
giving as a percentage of discretionary income -- the income remaining after necessities like housing, taxes, and food are
paid for. It may cost more to live in Massachusetts than in Mississippi, but after that difference is taken into account,
which state's residents are more generous?
It isn't even close. In only one of the Bay State's 14 counties do taxpayers give more than 6.5 percent of their
discretionary income to charity. In only two of Mississippi's 81 counties do they give less. Residents of Lee County,
Miss. -- county seat: Tupelo -- donate an average of $9,126 to charity on discretionary income of $61,421. But in
Boston and Suffolk County, Mass., where discretionary income is nearly $79,000, the average amount given to charity is
Among the nation's 50 largest cities, Boston (the only one in New England) ranks fifth in income. In charitable giving it
ranks 19th. Widen the lens angle, and the results are even uglier. Of the 50 largest metropolitan areas, the three located in
New England -- Boston/Worcester/Lawrence, Providence/Fall River, and Hartford -- were ranked, respectively, 48th,
49th, and 50th in the percentage of discretionary income given to charity.
Many Americans give till it hurts. For far too many New Englanders, it apparently hurts to give. Why?
One part of the answer is that charity begins with religion, and New England is no longer very religious. To be sure, it
isn't necessary to go to church, read the Bible, or believe in God to give generously and selflessly to charity. But the data
speak for themselves. Americans who live where the influence of religion is strong -- in heavily Mormon Utah, for
example, or the Southern Bible Belt, or Brooklyn -- tend to share much more of their wealth with others. Where the
culture is more secular and the churches command less respect, charitable giving dries up.
New England wasn't always so miserly. There was a time when people in this part of the country understood
instinctively that they had an obligation -- a personal obligation -- to help the unfortunate and support good works. The
way to demonstrate compassion, the men and women of New England once knew, was to dig into their own pockets and
give of their own time -- to love their neighbors as themselves, especially those who were in trouble or in need.
It had been that way from the very start. On board the Arbella in 1630, John Winthrop urged his flock of pioneers to
make the new settlement they were coming to build -- the Massachusetts Bay Colony -- a "model of Christian charity."
That meant, he said in a famous sermon, that "we must be willing to abridge ourselves of our superfluities for the supply of
others' necessities." The Puritans and their descendants took that exhortation to heart, and for generations New England
was renowned for its philanthropic institutions and humanitarian spirit.
Today, by contrast, this part of the country -- and Massachusetts in particular -- is far better known for its liberal
politics and big-government activism. And it is probably no coincidence that volunteerism and charity have declined as the
public sector has swelled.
After all, if it's the government's job to take care of the hungry, why give money to a soup kitchen or homeless shelter?
If it's up to the state to cure every social ill, who needs good Samaritans or private philanthropy? By taking responsibility
"for the supply of others' necessities," government accustoms ordinary citizens to the idea that their charity and help are
unnecessary. Perhaps it is political culture as much as religious conviction that explains why Mississippi gives and
"We shall be as a city upon a hill," Governor Winthrop warned. "The eyes of all people are upon us." What do those
eyes see in New England today? Self-righteous cheapskates who regularly proclaim their compassion, but rarely put their
money where their mouth is.
Like this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Jeff Jacoby is a Boston Globe columnist. Comment by clicking here.
05/06/03: Help the living before the dead
04/25/03: The search for the 'smoking gun'
04/21/03: Trading truth for access?
04/14/03: Kerry's abortion litmus test
04/11/03: Meanwhile, in Cuba, the tyranny goes on
04/07/03: Explaining the war to a six-year-old
03/31/03: Empowering a terroristocracy in the name of 'peace'?
03/27/03: America the liberator
03/10/03: THE UNITED NATIONS, RIP
03/10/03: Changing the definition of marriage
03/07/03: Liberate Iraq -- even with unclean hands
03/03/03: Why talk radio tilts right
02/21/03: A boost for Saddam
02/10/03: On outing Kerry
02/06/03: The neverending voyage
02/03/03: This hasn't been a 'rush to war'
01/31/03: Killing the terror regimes
01/29/03: How not to win the war
01/24/03: The UN's moral irrelevance
01/22/03: Musings, random and otherwise
01/17/03: The Sharpton hypocrisy
01/13/03: The fig leaf of 'diversity'
01/10/03: Israeli restraint makes terrorism more likely
01/02/03: The double standard on political hate speech
12/30/02: Good for the spirit, good for the body
12/23/02: The college president who owes a greater duty to a fugitive serial killer than the public or to the law
12/20/02: The death penalty by the numbers
12/16/02: Yes, Virginia, there is (still) a liberal media bias
12/03/02: On the brink of regime change --- in Iran
11/27/02: Light's victory over darkness
11/25/02: A 'Republican' lesson from a Democratic convention
11/22/02: The slippery senator
11/18/02: The campus 'diversity' fraud
11/14/02: MURDER AT A KIBBUTZ
11/01/02: Saddam's shop of horrors
10/24/02: Musings, random and otherwise
10/17/02: Jimma's ignoble prize
10/14/02: New Jersey's bigot laureate
10/11/02: Today it is libs who are most likely to demand the silencing of speech they disapprove of
10/04/02: Learning English from Day 1
09/30/02: The world will follow us to war
09/27/02: The face of antisemitism
09/20/02: Starving time in Zimbabwe
09/14/02: Against moral confusion / 9-12-2002
09/03/02: With 'eternal friends' like these
08/30/02: Enriching survivors was a costly mistake
08/26/02: John Kerry's absent passion
08/23/02: Bonnie, get your gun
08/19/02: A screenwriter's remorse
07/29/02: The real abortion extremists
07/26/02: Another round of Kemp-Roth
07/19/02: Jews among Arabs, Arabs among Jews
07/15/02: Musings, random and otherwise
07/12/02: The new civil rights champions
07/03/02: Riding the rails
07/01/02: The prerequisite to peace
06/24/02: Frisking AlGore
06/17/02: Offense, not defense, is the key to homeland security
06/14/02: Looking at the horror
06/07/02: The cost of a death-penalty moratorium
06/03/02: Executing 'children,' and other death-penalty myths
05/29/02: A real threat?
05/24/02: The message in Arafat's headdress
05/20/02: (Mis)playing the popularity card
05/10/02: Outspoken, Muslim -- and moderate
05/10/02: The heroes in Castro's jails
05/06/02: The disappearing history term paper
05/03/02: Musings, random and otherwise
04/29/02: The canary in Europe's mine
04/15/02: Powell's crazy mission
04/12/02: The slavery reparations hustle
04/08/02: Peace at any price = war
03/26/02: Decency matters most, Caleb
03/22/02: The U.S. embargo and Cuba's future
03/19/02: The keepers of Cuba's conscience
03/15/02: A walk in Havana
02/26/02: Buchanan's lament
02/12/02: What 'peace' means to Arafat
02/08/02: STEVEN EMERSON AND THE NPR BLACKLIST
02/05/02: Antismoking: Who pays?
02/01/02: Turn the Saudis
01/25/02: Making MLK cry
01/21/02: Ted to tax cut: Drop dead
01/18/02: Musings random and otherwise
01/14/02: An ultimatum to Saudi Arabia
01/11/02: Friendship, Saudi-style
01/07/02: Shakedown at Harvard
01/04/02: More guns, more safety
01/02/02: Smears and slanders from the Left
12/28/01: Congress gives to others -- and itself
12/24/01: The littlest peacemakers
12/20/01: How to condemn terror
12/18/01: Greenland once was
12/14/01: Parents who never said ''no''
12/11/01: Wit and (economic) wisdom
12/07/01: THE PALESTINIANS' MYTH
12/04/01: The war against Israel goes on
11/30/01: Tribunals, motorcycles -- and freedom
11/19/01: Friendship and the House of Saud
11/12/01: The Justice Department's unjust monopoly
11/09/01: Muslim, but not extremist
11/02/01: Too good for Oprah
10/29/01: Journalism and the 'neutrality fetish'
10/26/01: Derail these subsidies
10/22/01: Good and evil in the New York Times
10/15/01: Rush Limbaugh's ear
10/08/01: With allies like these
10/01/01: An unpardonable act
09/28/01: THE CENSORS ARE COMING! THE CENSORS ARE COMING!
09/25/01: Speaking out against terror
09/21/01: What the terrorists saw
09/17/01: Calling evil by its name
09/13/01: Our enemies mean what they say
09/04/01: The real bigots
08/31/01: Shrugging at genocide
08/28/01: Big Brother's privacy -- or ours?
08/24/01: The mufti's message of hate
08/21/01: Remembering the 'Wall of Shame'
08/16/01: If I were the editor ...
08/14/01: If I were the Transportation Czar ...
08/10/01: Import quotas 'steel' from us all
08/07/01: Is gay "marriage" a threat?
08/03/01: A colorblind nominee
07/27/01: Eminent-domain tortures
07/24/01: On protecting the flag ... and drivers ... and immigrants
07/20/01: Dying for better mileage
07/17/01: Why Americans would rather drive
07/13/01: Do these cabbies look like bigots?
07/10/01: 'Defeated in the bedroom'
07/06/01: Who's white? Who's Hispanic? Who cares?
07/02/01: Big(oted) man on campus
06/29/01: Still appeasing China's dictators
06/21/01: Cuban liberty: A test for Bush
06/19/01: The feeble 'arguments' against capital punishment
06/12/01: What energy crisis?
06/08/01: A jewel in the crown of self-government
05/31/01: The settlement myth
05/25/01: An award JFK would have liked
05/22/01: No Internet taxes? No problem
05/18/01: Heather has five mommies (and a daddy)
05/15/01: An execution, not a lynching
05/11/01: Losing the common tongue
05/08/01: Olympics 2008: Say no to Beijing
05/04/01: Do welfare mothers a kindness: Make them work
05/01/01: Another man's child
04/24/01: Sharon should have said no
04/02/01: The Inhumane Society
03/30/01: To have a friend, Caleb, be a friend
03/27/01: Is Chief Wahoo racist?
03/22/01: Ending the Clinton appeasement
03/20/01: They're coming for you
03/16/01: Kennedy v. Kennedy
03/13/01: We should see McVeigh die
03/09/01: The Taliban's wrecking job
03/07/01: The No. 1 reason to cut taxes
03/02/01: A Harvard candidate's silence on free speech
02/27/01: A lesson from Birmingham jail
02/20/01: How Jimmy Carter got his good name back
02/15/01: Cashing in on the presidency
02/09/01: The debt for slavery -- and for freedom
02/06/01: The reparations calculation
02/01/01: The freedom not to say 'amen'
01/29/01: Chavez's 'hypocrisy': Take a closer look
01/26/01: Good-bye, good riddance
01/23/01: When everything changed (mostly for the better)
01/19/01: The real zealots
01/16/01: Pardon Clinton?
01/11/01: The fanaticism of Linda Chavez
01/09/01: When Jerusalem was divided
01/05/01 THEY NEVER FORGOT THEE, O JERUSALEM
12/29/00 Liberal hate speech, 2000
12/15/00Does the Constitution expect poor children be condemned to lousy government schools?
12/08/00 Powell is wrong man to run State Department
12/05/00 The 'MCAS' teens give each other
12/01/00 Turning his back on the Vietnamese -- again
11/23/00 Why were the Pilgrims thankful?
11/21/00 The fruit of this 'peace process' is war
11/13/00 Unleashing the lawyers
11/17/00 Gore's mark on history
40 reasons to say NO to Gore
© 2002, Boston Globe