Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review August 24, 2000 / 23 Menachem-Av, 5760

George Will

George Will
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Sauerkraut Ice Cream -- "ONLY IN AMERICA!" exclaimed Joseph Lieberman to the Democratic convention, 132 years after Britain's Conservative Party, not then a deep lagoon of advanced thinking, produced a Jewish prime minister, and 44 years after Catholic Dublin elected a Jewish mayor. The presidential campaign is off to a promising start--promising, that is, hilarity.

At his convention Al Gore the Alpha Male made a cameo appearance, and for a while, at least, The Kiss will refer to more than Rodin's sculpture. Gore is famously bookish, but Tipper Gore will not tease him, as Juliet did Romeo, "You kiss by th' book." However, a few days later, during his river trip, a more familiar Gore was inflicting Washington repartee on some Midwesterners who boasted about their girls' volleyball team. Gore's response was: "You all support Title IX?"

But the central jest of the Gore campaign is in offering the country a heaping bowl of sauerkraut ice cream. Sauerkraut is fine in its place, and as Flaubert said of ice cream, the only way it could be better would be if it were a sin. However, two good things need not be good when blended. So it is with the flapdoodle that is the Gore campaign's current confection, a mixture of triumphalism and victim-mongering masquerading as populism.

Gore argues that because of the masterful economic management of the Clinton-Gore administration, Americans now live on the sunlit uplands of happiness--where they are being ground into the dust beneath the jackboots of the "powerful," whom only a Gore-Lieberman administration can cage. Lieberman has signaled ardent, not to say invertebrate eagerness to help defend "the people" against "the powerful." That is, "the people," such as the teachers' unions that had 457 of the 727 public employee union delegates at the convention, against "the powerful," such as inner-city children and their parents, mostly minorities, seeking school choice.

Going out of his way to confirm the axiom that everything changes but the avant-garde, Gore, holding aloft progressivism's tattered banner, promises a rapacious benevolence. In vowing that no need (defined, in contemporary America, as a 48-hour-old want) shall go unmet, he is answering an eight-year old plea made in Richmond, Va., during the second Bush-Clinton debate eight years ago.

It was made by that fellow who wore his hair in a ponytail and his heart on his sleeve. Speaking from the audience, his cri de coeur was for the candidates to "make a commitment to the citizens of the U.S. to meet our needs, and we have many." Americans, says Gore today, are unprecedentedly prosperous and tremendously needy.

In his convention appearance Gore recalled how hardships demanded self-reliance from his parents and made them an inspiration to him. Gore wowed his convention by vowing to banish forever all the sorts of challenging conditions that made his parents so inspiring.

Gore's use of his convention to hammer home this message, like a nail driven flush to a plank, demonstrates why the complaint that the conventions nowadays are "scripted" and therefore not newsworthy is a crashing non sequitur. The very fact that they are tightly controlled to clearly express the political priorities of the controllers makes them especially newsworthy, just as the fact that every aspect of the Soviet press reflected government calculation made that press particularly fascinating to Kremlinologists.

The rollicking incoherence of Gore's prosperity-meets-populism campaign forces him to portray George W. Bush as a reactionary, even though Bush wants the campaign to be essentially a compassion competition. However, to be pitilessly fair to Bush, he also has an aesthetic aspiration, that of making Washington sweeter. This he signaled by naming his first foray after his convention the "Change the Tone Tour." Change the tone of Washington, that is, by ending what he, like his father, calls "bickering."

This particular faith of his father should be jettisoned. George Herbert Walker Bush's presidency began to rocket downhill midway through his Inaugural Address, when he said, "The American people . . . didn't send us here to bicker." Oh, but they did, and will do so again this year. The American people send particular representatives rather than others to Washington so they will bicker (both Bushes use a word calculated to make political differences seem petty and ill-mannered), argue, obstruct, denounce and generally engage in--pardon the lurid word--partisanship. That is why there are two parties.

Or are there? Last weekend Bush, in Dallas, denounced Gore for favoring "big government," then flew to New Mexico, which Bill Clinton carried twice, to promise $928 million to improve Native American schools.

Comment on JWR contributor George Will's column by clicking here.


08/21/00: The Partial-Birth Censors
08/18/00: A Party to Prosperity
08/14/00: The National Scold on the Stump
08/10/00: The Thinking Person's Choice
08/07/00: The GOP of Powell And Rice
08/03/00: Panic in the Gore Camp
07/27/00: . . . Both Radical and Reassuring
07/06/00: Harry Potter: A Wizard's Return
07/03/00: Recalling the Revolution
06/29/00: An Act of Judicial Infamy
06/26/00: Life, Liberty and ... the Pursuit of Foxes
06/21/00: Fumble on Prayer
06/19/00: The unified field theory of culture
06/15/00: Schools Beset by Lawyers And Shrinks
06/12/00: Missile Defense Charade
06/07/00: The Grandparent Dissent
06/05/00: Liberal Condescension
06/01/00: Great Awakenings
05/30/00: Suddenly Social Security
05/25/00: Forget Values, Let's Talk Virtues
05/22/00: AlGore the Hysteric
05/15/00: Majestic Avenue
05/11/00: Just How Irrational Is the Exuberance?
05/08/00: Home-Run Glut
05/04/00: A Lesson Plan for Gore
05/01/00: The Hijacking of the Primaries
04/28/00: The Raid in Little Havana
04/24/00: Tinkering Again
04/17/00: A Judgment Against Hate
04/13/00: Tech- Stock Joy Ride
04/10/00: What the bobos are buying
04/06/00: A must-read horror book
04/03/00: 'Improving' the Bill of Rights
03/30/00: Sleaze, The Sequel
03/27/00: How new 'rights' will destroy freedom
03/23/00: Death and the Liveliest Writing
03/20/00: Powell is Dubyah's best bet
03/16/00: Free to Be Politically Intense
03/13/00: Runnin', Gunnin' and Gambling
03/09/00: And Now Back to Republican Business
03/06/00: As the Clock Runs Out on Bradley
03/02/00: Island of Equal Protection
02/28/00: . . . The Right Response
02/24/00: Federal Swelling
02/22/00: Greenspan Tweaks
02/17/00: Crucial Carolina (and Montana and . . .)
02/10/00: McCain's Distortions
02/10/00: The Disciplining of Austria
02/07/00: Free to Speak, Free to Give
02/02/00: Conservatives in a Changing Market
01/31/00: America's true unity day
01/27/00: For the Voter Who Can't Be Bothered
01/25/00: The FBI and the golden age of child pornography
01/20/00: Scruples and Science
01/18/00: Bradley: Better for What Ails Us
01/13/00: O'Brian Rules the Waves
01/10/00: Patron of the boom
01/06/00: In Cactus Jack's Footsteps
01/03/00: The long year
12/31/99: A Stark Perspective On a Radical Century
12/20/99: Soldiers' Snapshots of the Hell They Created
12/16/99: Star-Crossed Banner
12/13/99: Hubert Humphrey Wannabe
12/09/99: Stupidity in Seattle
12/06/99: Bradley's most important vote
12/03/99: Boys will be boys --- or you can always drug 'em
12/01/99: Confidence in the Gore Camp
11/29/99: Busing's End
11/22/99: When We Enjoyed Politics
11/18/99: Ever the Global Gloomster
11/15/99: The Politics of Sanctimony
11/10/99: Risks of Restraining
11/08/99: Willie Brown Besieged
11/04/99: One-House Town
11/01/99: Crack and Cant
10/28/99: Tax Break for the Yachting Class
10/25/99: Ready for The Big Leagues?
10/21/99: Where honor and responsibility still exist
10/18/99: Is Free Speech Only for the Media?
10/14/99: A Beguiling Amateur
10/11/99: Money in Politics: Where's the Problem?
10/08/99: Soft Thinking On Soft Money

© 2000, Washington Post Writer's Group