Jewish World Review Apr. 14, 1999 /28 Nissan 5759
Elizabeth Dole's choice
(JWR) ---- (http://www.jewishworldreview.com)
POTENTIAL PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE Elizabeth Dole has spoken out on abortion.
Dole has stated her political position, but she has not revealed her moral position. Perhaps
that will come later when it is sufficiently developed.
Dole is correct when she says there currently is no hope of passing a constitutional
amendment overturning the Supreme Court's 1973 Roe vs. Wade decision. But in 1954,
when the Supreme Court decided "separate but equal'' unconstitutionally segregated the
races, full equality for blacks seemed far away. Great strides have been made toward that
objective because principled people led opinion instead of following it.
Dole says that a constitutional amendment "is not going to happen,'' and so she doesn't want
to be drawn into "dead-end debates'' over the subject. A reminder: It is the babies who are
dying. The debate doesn't have to expire with them. And who better than a Republican
woman to help keep this issue alive and to shape public opinion in the direction of life? The
reluctance of many Republicans to speak of this horror has made other categories of life
more vulnerable. That's why the health care debate has brought us to euthanasia's door.
In a letter to an Arizona woman, Dole said she opposes abortion "except in cases of rape or
incest or to save the life of the mother.'' She added that Republican women in leadership
positions can set an example by stopping partial-birth abortions, enacting parental notification
requirements, continuing the ban on government funding "and do whatever possible to place
unwanted babies with adoptive parents who will love and care for them.''
This is the politics of incrementalism, a good strategy. What Dole needs to do now is to give
us the moral foundation for her opposition to abortion. Do Republicans want to stand only for
the possible and pragmatic, or should they lead with truth? Does she believe a baby's legal
rights and personhood begin at conception? If not, when do they begin, and why?
These questions need answers because many politicians who once held positions similar to
Dole's reversed course when they feared a pro-life stance might end their political careers.
Here are quotes from some of the more prominent turncoats: "I am opposed to abortion and
to government funding of abortions. We should not spend state funds on abortions because
so many people believe abortion is wrong.'' (Gov. Bill Clinton in a 1986 letter to Arkansas
Right to Life)
"Life is the division of human cells, a process that begins with conception .... The (Supreme
Court's ruling) was unjust, and it is incumbent on the Congress to correct the injustice .... I
have always been supportive of pro-life legislation. I intend to remain steadfast on the issue
.... I believe that the life of the unborn should be protected at all costs.'' (Rep. Richard
Gephardt (D-Mo.), 1977)
In 1984 Sen. Al Gore wrote a constituent of his "deep personal conviction that abortion is
wrong,'' and he voted to amend the Civil Rights Act to define the word "person'' to "include
unborn children from the moment of conception.'' Apparently Gore's "conviction'' wasn't that
deep. He now favors unrestricted abortion.
In a 1971 letter, Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.) wrote that "human life, even at its earliest
stages, has a certain right which must be recognized -- the right to be born, the right to love,
the right to grow old.''
Rev. Jesse Jackson once endorsed the Hyde Amendment, which restricts federally funded
abortions except in cases of rape, incest or when the mother's life is endangered. In an open
letter to Congress, Jackson said he opposed the use of federal funds for "killing infants.'' In
1977 Jackson wrote an article for National Right to Life News that said: "It takes three to
make a baby: a man, a woman and the Holy Spirit. What happens to the mind of a person,
and the moral fabric of a nation, that accepts the aborting of the life of a baby without a pang
of conscience? What kind of a person and what kind of a society will we have 20 years
hence if life can be taken so casually?''
Those questions remain valid, though Jackson no longer asks them. Elizabeth Dole has
answered the political question. It is because so many have abandoned positions they once
claimed to have held on principle that Dole should state her moral position and say whether it
is deeper than Al
04/09/99: The taxman cometh
04/05/99: MEMO: MAKE LOVE AND WAR -- AND KEEP IT SIMPLE
03/30/99: Human-rights terror in China
03/25/99: Yasser Arafat:
bad cop, worse cop
03/23/99: Bubba’s multiplied lies
03/18/99: Reinventing AlGore
03/16/99:Americans get bull while China shops
03/12/99: Bill Lan Lee: Flouting the law
03/09/99: Don't worry about your child, be happy
03/08/99:The ‘lady' is a tramp
Proving myself to President Clinton
02/24/99: New slaves to a new slavery
02/19/99: GOP losers tell winner how to win
02/17/99: The Clinton legacy
02/10/99: More a man, less a president
02/08/99: Mr. President: Tear down this wall
02/03/99: Guess who's coming to breakfast
02/01/99: NBC gets the message;is CBS missing it?
01/25/99: Let's not make this deal
01/25/99: Gov. George Bush's 'responsibility era'
01/19/99: Prophets without honor
01/12/99: The Senate's predicament and opportunity
01/08/99: ‘Compassionate conservatism’ is redundant
01/06/99: Don't give my regards to 'Narroway'
01/04/99: In culture war, a parking space trumps sex
12/28/98: Until we've learned our lesson
12/24/98: Peace in Bethlehem!? Something to think about during Xmas
12/22/98: The slime machine brings Apocalypse Now
12/15/98: The 'moving finger'
12/11/98: This sorry president
12/09/98: The eclipse of principle
12/03/98: Destroying Jewry on the installment plan
12/07/98: Before the Age of Clinton
12/01/98: Apathy and ignorance
11/19/98: Ken Starr's moment of truth
11/19/98: The fall of journalism's empire
11/17/98: Republicans drift while conservatives float
11/13/98: Supreme Courtupholds freedom of school-choice
11/10/98: The revolting Republican 'revolution'
11/06/98: Hulk Hogan for president?
11/03/98: Clinton's greatest peril isn't Monica
10/30/98: Mother Teresa was right about killing
10/27/98: Clinton to Netanyahu: 'You're despicable'
10/21/98: A 'peace' agreement: Wye not?
10/19/98: Vanity Fair snubs some of the greatest women 'leaders'
10/14/98:The mean machine
10/09/98: Impeachment: an outside perspective
10/07/98: The corruption of the Secret Service
10/02/98: Land erosion in Israel
10/01/98: The race panel: lies in black and white
9/18/98: The Clinton strategy and the Clinton legacy
9/18/98: Stopping him before he sins again
9/15/98: Repenting when the end is near
9/11/98: Faithfully executing: Congress vs. the President
9/10/98: The degrees of separation between Dan Burton and Bill Clinton
9/08/98: Joe Lieberman and the Democrats' conscience
9/04/98: Clinton vs. Reagan and the struggle for power
9/02/98: If only Bubba had been a Boy Scout
8/31/98: Liberal clergy and the Lewinsky affair
8/27/98: Combating the terrorists among us
8/25/98: The president as 'Chicken Little'
8/20/98: That was no apology
8/18/98: Big government's crab grab
8/14/98:Untruths, half-truths and anything but the
8/12/98: Lying under oath: past and present impeachable offenses
8/10/98: Endangered species
8/04/98: In search of an unstained president
7/31/98: The UK is ahead of US in one area...
7/28/98: Murder near and far
7/21/98: Telling the truth about
7/17/98: One Nation? Indivisible?
7/14/98: Who cares about killing when the 'good times' are rolling?
7/10/98: George W. Bush: a different 'boomer'
7/08/98: My lunch with Roy Rogers
7/06/98: News unfit to print (or broadcast)
6/30/98: Smoke gets in their eyes
6/25/98: Sugar and Spice Girls
6/19/98: William Perry opposed
technology transfers to China
6/19/98: The Clinton hare vs.the Starr tortoise
6/17/98: The President's rocky road to China
6/15/98: Let the children go
6/9/98: Oregon: the new killing fields
6/5/98: Speaking plainly: the cover-up continues
6/2/98: Barry Goldwater: in our hearts
5/28/98:The Speaker's insightful remarks
5/26/98: As bad as it gets
5/25/98:Union dues and don'ts
Connecting those Chinese campaign
5/19/98: Clinton on the couch
John Ashcroft: another
5/8/98: Terms of dismemberment
5/5/98: Clinton's tangled Webb
4/30/98: Return of the Jedi
4/28/98: Desparately seeking Susan
4/23/98: RICO's threat to free-speech and expression
4/21/98: Educating children v. preserving an institution
4/19/98: Analyzing the birth of a possible new nation
4/14/98: What's fair about our tax system?
4/10/98: CBS: 'Touched by a perv'
4/8/98: Judge Wright's wrong reasoning on sexual harassment
4/2/98: How about helping American cities before African?
3/31/98:Revenge of the children
3/29/98: The Clinton strategy: delay, deceive, deny, and destroy
3/26/98: Moralist Gary Hart
3/23/98: CNN's century of (liberal) women
3/17/98: Dandy Dan
3/15/98: An imposed 'settlement' settles nothing
3/13/98: David Brock's Turnabout
©1999, LA TimesSyndicate