Jewish World Review March 19, 2001/ 21 Adar 5761
http://www.jewishworldreview.com -- NOT for nothing is the mule the symbol of the Army. Sometimes you have to whack mules and generals between the eyes to get their attention.
Gen. Eric Shinseki, the Army chief of staff, took such a hit this week after the Pentagon stubbornly refused to take a hint from the commander in chief to think again about handing out black berets, like khaki skivvies, to every man (and woman) in the Army.
The final whack came not from President Bush, who offered a gentle hint, but from Congress. When the congressmen who pass on defense appropriations told the Pentagon to pay attention, someone at the Pentagon finally decided that maybe someone should.
A spokesman for Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy secretary of defense, said the department would not only look into the idea of universal black berets, but at the decision to bypass U.S. manufacturers in violation of the law to award contracts to factories in China, of all countries.
The idea of universal black berets, the symbol of the Rangers, came from Gen. Shinseki himself, as "a symbol of the transformed Army for the 21st Century." Generals are not accustomed to anyone questioning whether their bright ideas are really as bright as they think they are, and when George W. Bush suggested that the Army take another look the generals and their colonels-in-waiting apparently decided that it was not necessary to humor the commander in chief on this one.
The Rangers, a lean, mean outfit trained to take the toughest assignments, are jealous of the black beret, earned by the kind of physical punishment that a lot of folks would regard as hazing, and don't understand why their symbol should suddenly be given to cooks, clerks and latrine orderlies just to make them feel good about themselves and the 21st century. The Rangers have worn the black beret since 1951, not long after the 2nd Battalion made the Rangers' reputation on Omaha Beach. The "boys of Pointe du Hoc" lost 135 of the 225 men who wrested the position from the Germans.
When the Rangers, usually in the voice of ex-Rangers no longer in the Army and no longer subject to military discipline, protested, the Army brushed them off. Gen. Shinseki declined to meet them, and his spokesman blew off their concerns: "We are not seriously investigating that there is a morale problem because we don't believe there is one." At one point the Army put out a statement from a sergeant major that "the decision has been made, and it is not up for discussion."
Too bad for the Army, but sergeant majors and lieutenant colonels and even decorated four-star generals don't get to decide what is and what is not up for discussion. It's odd that the Pentagon, usually deft at this kind of Washington dancing, stumbled so badly, first ignoring the president, then brushing him off, and not doing what it should have known it would have to do, until a growing number of congressmen began to make noise. Everyone was clearly trying to give the general, whom everyone admires, an opportunity to retreat with his flag still aloft.
Sen. John Warner of Virginia, the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, finally wrote to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. He chose his words carefully, but his meaning was clear enough. "I am requesting a 'stand down' to permit officials of the Bush administration an opportunity to review the policy and report to you. This was a decision made during the Clinton administration which I believe, in light of the outpouring of conscientious concern from both active and former soldiers, deserves a second look by the Bush administration."
He was not rendering a final judgment on the black berets, the senator said, but when one of the former Rangers who marched 750 miles to Washington to protest offered the senator, a Marine, a black beret for himself, he declined. "I'm not going to take it because I didn't earn it."
Gen. Shinseki is, alas, right about one thing. The 21st century Army is "a transformed Army," and the proof of it is the sagging morale that the general's spokesman insists the Army doesn't see. The military is led by senior officers of a new generation, who appear to believe that the traditions of selfless service and battlefield sacrifice are not as important as they once were. We've got computers now. When girls and gays can do it, who needs the example of Stonewall Jackson and Phil Sheridan and Alvin York and George S. Patton in "a transformed Army?"
But one day sooner if not later the "transformed Army"
will be called on to fight a tougher foe than Saddam Hussein's
Republican Guard or unorganized riffraff in the Third World.
When that day arrives there won't be anything virtual about
03/14/01: Second thoughts on the faith initiative
03/12/01: Getting punch drunk on disappointment
11/10/00: Something sinister in Palm Beach
11/07/00: Low days in the life of the ruptured duck
11/06/00: A little race baiting in the final hours
11/01/00: Creator gets a hard time on the hustings
10/27/00: The sorcerer rides to rescue his apprentice
10/25/00: The founding father with a story to tell
10/23/00: A lonely passion for religious rights
10/16/00: Spending blood on the folly of fools
10/11/00: A big night for the embellisher-in-chief
10/06/00: AlGore's black problem
10/04/00: In headlong pursuit of the bigot vote
10/02/00: A modest proposal for Rick Lazio
09/27/00: When folks at home give up on a scamp
09/25/00: Gore plot exposed! The secret minutes
09/18/00: Playing politics with the blood supply
09/14/00: Al sets out to find his 'tolerance level'
09/12/00: When it's time for a thumb in the eye
09/07/00: Making a daughter a campaign asset
09/04/00: A footnote to the lie: How he beats the rap
08/30/00: Unbearable lightness of a cyberjournal
08/21/00: Clinton chickens on AlGore's roost
08/16/00: The long goodbye to California's cash
08/09/00: Innocence by proxy is a risky scheme
08/07/00: After insulin shock, an authentic rouser
08/02/00: When it gets hard not to get a little giddy
07/31/00: George W.'s legions of summer soldiers
07/26/00: He's set a surprise --- or a trap for himself
07/24/00: How do you serve a turkey in August?
07/19/00: Would Hillary sling a lie about a slur?
07/17/00: Process, not peace, at a Velveeta summit
07/12/00: The Texas two-step, a nudge and a wink
07/10/00: The Great Mentioner and his busy season
07/05/00: No Mexican standoff in these results
07/03/00: Denting a few egos in the U.S. Senate
06/28/00: Bureaucracy amok! Punctuation in peril!
06/26/00: The water torture of American resolve
06/21/00: The happy hangman is a busy hangman
06/19/00: Dick Gephardt finds a Dixie dreamboat
06/14/00: Taking a byte out of innovation
06/12/00: 'Go away, little boy, you're bothering us'
06/07/00: When a little envy is painful to watch
06/05/00: Fire and thunder, bubble and squeak
05/31/00: South of the border, politics is pepper
05/26/00: Running out of luck with home folks
05/24/00: The heart says no, but the head says yes
05/22/00: A fine opportunity to set an example
05/17/00: The Sunday school for Republicans
05/15/00: Hillary's surrogate for telling tall tales
05/10/00: Listening to the voice of an authentic man
05/08/00: First a lot of bluster, then the retreat
05/02/00: Good news for Rudy, bad news for Hillary
04/28/00: The long goodbye to Elian's boyhood
04/25/00: Spooked by Castro, Bubba blinks
04/14/00: One flag down and two memorials to go
04/11/00: Consistency finds a jewel in Janet Reno
04/07/00: Here's the good word (and it's in English)
04/04/00: When bureaucrats mock the courts
03/28/00: How Hollywood sets the virtual table
03/24/00: Dissing a president can ruin a whole day
03/20/00: When shame begets the painful insult
03/14/00: The risky business of making an apology
03/10/00: The pouters bugging a weary John McCain
03/07/00: When all good things (sob) come to an end