Jewish World Review March 14, 2001/ 19 Adar 5761
http://www.jewishworldreview.com -- George W. Bush has faith in his faith-based initiative, and a good thing, too. Some surprising folks are shooting at it.
The president sprang to the defense of the concept, if not every as-yet uncrossed "t" and undotted "i" in the program, in the wake of an aide's having been quoted — he says inaccurately — in The Washington Post suggesting that Mr. Bush is looking for a way to back away from his idea.
By the Post's account, Don Eberly, deputy director of the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, said the president had postponed sending the legislation to Capitol Hill: "We're not ready to send our bill up."
Not necessarily so, the White House said yesterday. Mr. Eberly was not available, but Ari Fleischer, the president's press agent, said Mr. Eberly does not think the dispatch in The Post was "an accurate reflection" of what he had said. "I found that whole story puzzling."
But not so puzzling to longtime Post readers, who are accustomed to hostility to everything that smacks of faith, belief and religious conviction. The usual suspects are aligned against the initiative, as if addiction to crack cocaine, while not necessarily good, is still better than addiction to belief in G-d. Richard Cohen, writing in The Post, rebukes the Taleban for pulling down that enormous statue of Buddha in Afghanistan ("Afghanistan, you see, has a faith-based government"), and adds: "I can see no more reason to argue with them than with the Talibanic Pat Robertson, who warned the city of Orlando, Fla., that it would suffer some sort of natural catastrophe if it allowed a celebration of gay pride."
His analogy is curious, since Pat Robertson did not go to Orlando to pull down the pants of a single gay marcher, but Mr. Cohen was on a roll, next mocking the mother of William F. Buckley Jr. for having once asked her children to pray for her as she approached childbirth. "She had been warned, but had proceeded with her pregnancy, anyway. It was her 11th. Such is faith." Religious faith is bad in the Cohen Catechism unless it's faith in the lavender ribbon and the abortionist's suction pump.
The president himself, basking in applause yesterday in Florida, does not sound like a man backing away from anything. "There's a lot of bipartisan support on the Hill. I'm proud of our faith-based initiative. We're moving forward. It's the right thing to do."
Nevertheless, some of the president's own friends — Pat Robertson, the Rev. Jerry Falwell, Richard Land of the Southern Baptist Convention — are having second thoughts about how the faith-based initiative should be structured to make it worth keeping. Their First Amendment concerns are real, not the usual knee jerks of ACLU lawyers, professional apple-knockers and others who would if they could cheerfully set the lions on Christians again.
Many Christians worry lest the faith-based initiative cross the line drawn by the Constitution between church and state; others that faith-based groups, forced to satisfy hostile secular auditors, would surrender their identity in pursuit of federal booty. The lesson of federal aid to education is a bitter one. Not so long ago the nation's public schools were independent of all outsiders; four decades on, local school officials can't sharpen an Eberhard Faber No. 2 without an OK from a pinhead bureaucrat in Washington.
Mr. Robertson, reflecting traditional Baptist belief — Baptists invented separation of church and state — argues in the Wall Street Journal that the Bush proposal is inherently flawed from a faith-based perspective: "If government provides funding to the thousands of faith-based institutions but, under a tortured definition of separation of church and state, demands in return that those institutions give up their unique religious activities, then not only the effectiveness of these institutions but possibly their very raison d'etre may be lost." He further argues that if orthodox Catholic, Protestant and Jewish organizations tap the public treasury it won't be possible to obstruct unpopular denominations even though some of the orthodox denominations will no doubt want to.
Parts of the Bush plan are not controversial, such as expanding the charitable tax deduction to those who don't itemize federal tax deductions, or allowing states to use surplus welfare funds to promote a new tax credit for charitable donations. These could be enacted at once.
So might a system of vouchers, issued to individuals to use
in whatever program that works, whether faith-based and
driven by disbelief (if anyone could find such a program). "I
want the Bush faith-based plan to succeed," writes the
prophetic but not-so-Talebanic Pat Robertson. "With slight
modification, it will. Otherwise, I see trouble down the
03/12/01: Getting punch drunk on disappointment
11/10/00: Something sinister in Palm Beach
11/07/00: Low days in the life of the ruptured duck
11/06/00: A little race baiting in the final hours
11/01/00: Creator gets a hard time on the hustings
10/27/00: The sorcerer rides to rescue his apprentice
10/25/00: The founding father with a story to tell
10/23/00: A lonely passion for religious rights
10/16/00: Spending blood on the folly of fools
10/11/00: A big night for the embellisher-in-chief
10/06/00: AlGore's black problem
10/04/00: In headlong pursuit of the bigot vote
10/02/00: A modest proposal for Rick Lazio
09/27/00: When folks at home give up on a scamp
09/25/00: Gore plot exposed! The secret minutes
09/18/00: Playing politics with the blood supply
09/14/00: Al sets out to find his 'tolerance level'
09/12/00: When it's time for a thumb in the eye
09/07/00: Making a daughter a campaign asset
09/04/00: A footnote to the lie: How he beats the rap
08/30/00: Unbearable lightness of a cyberjournal
08/21/00: Clinton chickens on AlGore's roost
08/16/00: The long goodbye to California's cash
08/09/00: Innocence by proxy is a risky scheme
08/07/00: After insulin shock, an authentic rouser
08/02/00: When it gets hard not to get a little giddy
07/31/00: George W.'s legions of summer soldiers
07/26/00: He's set a surprise --- or a trap for himself
07/24/00: How do you serve a turkey in August?
07/19/00: Would Hillary sling a lie about a slur?
07/17/00: Process, not peace, at a Velveeta summit
07/12/00: The Texas two-step, a nudge and a wink
07/10/00: The Great Mentioner and his busy season
07/05/00: No Mexican standoff in these results
07/03/00: Denting a few egos in the U.S. Senate
06/28/00: Bureaucracy amok! Punctuation in peril!
06/26/00: The water torture of American resolve
06/21/00: The happy hangman is a busy hangman
06/19/00: Dick Gephardt finds a Dixie dreamboat
06/14/00: Taking a byte out of innovation
06/12/00: 'Go away, little boy, you're bothering us'
06/07/00: When a little envy is painful to watch
06/05/00: Fire and thunder, bubble and squeak
05/31/00: South of the border, politics is pepper
05/26/00: Running out of luck with home folks
05/24/00: The heart says no, but the head says yes
05/22/00: A fine opportunity to set an example
05/17/00: The Sunday school for Republicans
05/15/00: Hillary's surrogate for telling tall tales
05/10/00: Listening to the voice of an authentic man
05/08/00: First a lot of bluster, then the retreat
05/02/00: Good news for Rudy, bad news for Hillary
04/28/00: The long goodbye to Elian's boyhood
04/25/00: Spooked by Castro, Bubba blinks
04/14/00: One flag down and two memorials to go
04/11/00: Consistency finds a jewel in Janet Reno
04/07/00: Here's the good word (and it's in English)
04/04/00: When bureaucrats mock the courts
03/28/00: How Hollywood sets the virtual table
03/24/00: Dissing a president can ruin a whole day
03/20/00: When shame begets the painful insult
03/14/00: The risky business of making an apology
03/10/00: The pouters bugging a weary John McCain
03/07/00: When all good things (sob) come to an end