Jewish World Review Feb. 14, 2002 / 3 Adar, 5762

Jack Kemp

Jack Kemp
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Nurturing democratic capitalism in Afghanistan

http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com -- BY "abandoning" Afghanistan after the Soviet defeat there, the West permitted the infestation of the country by al-Qaeda terrorists and the rise of Osama bin Laden's puppet government, the Taliban. The lesson we learned from that unhappy episode is, don't make the same mistake twice. That said, exactly what were our mistakes, and what precisely will it mean for the West to "stand by" a post-Taliban Afghanistan?

One mistake is clear: We pulled out of Afghanistan without imposing civil order and disabling the criminal elements that kept the country in violent turmoil. We failed to break the back of the criminal gangs led by thuggish warlords who are temporarily for sale to the highest bidder, whose sole objective was, and remains, to plunder the country and grow, harvest and sell poppies, Afghanistan's only real cash crop.

By failing to restore order, we left post-Soviet Afghanistan a land without hope, a people without vision. As the famous African-American leader Marcus Garvey observed, "Without commerce and industry a people perish economically." Afghanistan was left with neither hope nor commerce. It perished spiritually and was devoured by a wicked gang of theocrats calling itself the Taliban who hijacked Islam and sold Afghanistan to terrorists.

The war against terrorism in Afghanistan will not end until the warlords are broken and their gangs dispersed, disarmed and sent home or put in jail.

The peace will not be won until the interim government under the very able leadership of Interim Chairman Hamid Karzai can operate on its own. We should give the warlords a choice: Break connections with Iran and other foreign powers, disband your armies and cooperate with the new government at the regional level, or you and your foreign sponsors will face the same fate as the Taliban.

What to do beyond restoring order? At one end of the spectrum, Doug Bandow of the libertarian Cato Institute contends our only vital stake in Afghanistan is to end the Taliban's support of the al-Qaeda terrorist network. Beyond that, he says, America has "no stake in attempting to construct a new regime in Kabul," which he labels a "fool's errand." Sen. Joe Biden, on the other hand, argues for ambitious "nation building," and financial aid sufficient to change the economic and social climate in the region and establish democratic and capitalist institutions.

The term "nation building" has been tossed around a lot recently, and when it is thrown around at international confabs, it usually means lots of Western financial aid to pay Afghani civil servants in a strong new central government and to pay foreign companies to build "infrastructure."

The World Bank, for example, estimates costs of $10 billion over the next five years to build schools, hospitals, sewers and roads. Karzai has requested $15 billion over 10 years. During a conference held in Tokyo recently, countries pledged a total of $4.5 billion in assistance over the next five years.

USAID Director Andrew Natsios is keenly aware of his responsibility to make sure the approximately $300 million approved by the Bush administration for Afghan aid is wisely spent on "quick-impact" health, education and agricultural projects.

If nation building is the snare and delusion of social engineers as Bandow suggests -- and up to a point, I think he has a point -- and if we can't afford to walk away from Afghanistan again -- which we can't -- what is to be done? Here is a list of things we can do more in the line of "democracy nurturing" that we know work.

Establish a free-trade zone among the United States, the European Union and Afghanistan with zero tariffs or at least low tariffs on agricultural products and textiles, which currently average 17 percent or three times the tariff on manufactured products.

Assist Afghanistan, as we did Japan and Germany, to create a functioning administration and to create incentives for economic growth.

Help Afghanistan's modern founding fathers create a "federalist" system of government that will accommodate the country's great diversity within a coherent structural framework.

Help Afghanistan design a pro-growth tax system as President Vladimir Putin did in Russia with rates no greater than 10 percent.

Assist Afghanistan to create a sound and stable currency the way Alexander Hamilton did at our founding. Working with western banks, we should help capitalize a private national bank of Afghanistan that would either dollarize the economy or back a new Afghan currency with dollars or euros. Opium is not only the sole cash crop of Afghanistan, it is also a currency the way tobacco was in Colonial America.

According to Maureen Orth of Vanity Fair, purchasing the poppy crop to be harvested this March would cost $100 million. We should do it and also provide the farmers who sell it the seeds to plant food next year, with the proviso that another poppy crop will not be tolerated.

Assist Afghanistan to create private property rights by distributing parcels of land as Abraham Lincoln did with homesteading to people who agree to settle and farm the land, and give the new landowners the mineral rights as well as the surface rights.


Jack Kemp is co-director of Empower America and Distinguished Fellow of the Competitive Enterprise Institute. Comment by clicking here.



Up

02/06/02: Gephardt embraces tax cuts and tax simplification
01/30/02: Just the facts
01/22/02: 'Been down so long it looks like up to me'
01/15/02: Confronting terror wherever it occurs
01/09/02: Daschle's war on Bush
01/03/02: Prosperity policies, not partisan politics
12/27/01: Governments create calamity, markets get the blame
12/18/01: 'Tis the season for Daschle to compromise
12/12/01: Hard choices made simple
12/05/01: Straight talk on Iraq
11/28/01: Not all tax cuts are created equal
11/20/01: Words have consequences
11/15/01: Deflationary recession
11/07/01: Consider Mideast reality in the war on terrorism
10/30/01: No 'stimulus' required
10/23/01: Good out of evil
10/16/01: Watching Iraq
10/12/01: The putrid stench of evil
10/04/01: Trade, terror and truth
10/01/01: Drive this scourge from the face of the Earth
09/25/01: Bush emerges as leader for his time
09/06/01: Middle East Madness has a chief instigator
08/30/01: It's about economic growth, stupid!
08/22/01: Phlebotomizers at the IMF
08/17/01: The Greenspan Recession
08/08/01: From Kyoto to Bonn, no science equals nonsense
07/25/01: Fiddling while the world economy freezes
07/19/01: Schundler should be New Jersey's next governor
07/12/01: Second wind for the global economy
07/06/01: An interest-rate target with no bull's-eye
06/28/01: Tax harmonization --- American-style
06/21/01: Warming diplomacy --- at what price?
06/13/01: A party that stands for nothing deserves to lose
06/07/01: No peace in the Middle East
05/30/01: Jeffords' palace coup
05/24/01: A supply-side energy plan
05/16/01: Getting Lincoln right
05/10/01: A good reason to borrow
05/01/01: Supreme Court makes racial profiling the law of the land
04/26/01: Campaign finance reform: silencing the lambs
04/17/01: Right wanted might in China case
04/12/01: How minority entrepreneurs can save the tax cut
04/04/01: Whose privacy is it?
03/29/01: A letter from Seoul
03/20/01: Ignore the double talk and double the tax cuts
03/13/01: Don't give up the bully pulpit on Social Security, Mr. President
03/06/01: Another attack on the economy
02/28/01: It's time to end deflation
02/21/01: Building blocks of humanity
02/15/01: Trumping the propaganda
02/06/01: The Gipper at 90
01/30/01: Kicking off a season of economic growth
01/24/01: The Bush tax agenda
01/17/01: Debating the Clinton legacy
01/10/01: No need for another Social Security commission
01/03/01: Truly a Golden Age, if we can keep it
12/27/00: The Grinch who turned off the holiday lights
12/20/00: Forging ahead
12/13/00: A new tax system for the 21st Century
12/07/00: Global government in retreat
11/30/00: An open letter to Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan
11/21/00: Don't forget the guy in charge
11/15/00: Civic virtue, civic vice
11/08/00: Memo to the president-elect
10/31/00: Scare tactics won't work
10/24/00: Prosperity in the balance
10/11/00: Al Gore's economics of fear
10/03/00: Al Gore IS debatable
09/27/00: Government should protect our online privacy
09/13/00: The most important issue
09/05/00: Defeating the Gore blitz
08/29/00: Workers of the world, rejoice
08/22/00: Just the facts, Mr. President
08/08/00: Reclaiming Lincoln's legacy
06/23/00: A renaissance for urban America?
06/16/00: Capital access can bridge 'digital divide'
06/08/00: Some friendly advice for Rick Lazio
05/26/00: Is the economy being saved or destroyed?
05/22/00: Immigration and the promise that is America
05/12/00: Stock market roulette or snobbery?
05/04/00: Is Rule of Law whatever we say it is?
05/01/00: Myths happen

© 2002, Copley News Service