Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Oct. 20, 2000 / 21 Tishrei, 5761

Jonah Goldberg

Jonah Goldberg
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Treatment of Farrakhan glosses over odd issues -- IT SEEMS to me, to paraphrase Shakespeare, that which we call a crackpot, by any other name should sound just as loopy.

Unfortunately, that's not the way the world works. We all know that poor people are "crazy," while rich people are "eccentric." Weak people are defined by their insanity, strong people are revered in spite of, or because of, their weirdness.

For example, if Oliver Stone were a handyman and sat next to you on a bus, you'd switch seats. But while such double standards are bad enough on the personal level, they are extremely dangerous at the political level. Which is why the continued kid-glove treatment of Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan is so disturbing.

Oh sure, journalists are quick to point out that Farrakhan has a long record of making anti-Semitic and racist remarks. We've all heard how Farrakhan has praised Hitler, called Judaism a "gutter religion" and the "Synagogue of Satan" and denounced the white man as the anti-Christ.

We've even been informed of Farrakhan's penchant for letting subordinates like Khalid Muhammad say the really nasty stuff. Muhammad called John Paul II a "no-good cracker" Pope, just to name one of thousands of disgusting comments.

Other people in the Farrakhan orbit have said the Vatican is run by "a lot of white faggot boys" and described the 12 apostles depicted in a painting of the Last Supper as "a whole lot of white faggot boys" and "America should be glad that every black man is not on a killing spree for all the suffering they have done."

But before I run out of space reprinting quotes anyone can get from the Anti-Defamation League, the real news isn't that Farrakhan is a bigot who keeps the company of bigots. It's that he's loony tunes.

Just this last Sunday, the day before the Million Family March (which fizzled spectacularly), Tim Russert of "Meet the Press" interviewed Farrakhan. Yes, Russert held Farrakhan's feet to the fire about his latest anti-Semitic comments (something about Joe Lieberman having dual loyalty to Israel and Jews running Hollywood).

But why give Farrakhan a chance to play games, spew more bile and impress the impressionable by saying controversial stuff? It seems that most interviewers want to attack the hate talk. That's certainly admirable.

But Russert et al. could do a lot more for the common good if they asked Farrakhan to explain why he thinks he has ridden in a flying saucer.

Now, to be fair, there is a whole lot in Nation of Islam theology (which is nothing like Orthodox Islam) about some odd stuff. And to be even more fair, every "religion" sounds pretty weird when put under a rationalist microscope. So, put aside the fact that the Nation of Islam holds that an evil black scientist created the "blue-eyed devil" white man in a lab accident 6,600 years ago (for some reason the calendar never seems to flip to, like, 6,603 years ago).

Put aside the fact that the Nation of Islam believes that whitey will be punished by a huge, city-sized, flying spaceship that will rain destruction down upon white people only. Forget the fact that there's only two and half months left in the century before that death-dealing spaceship will be past due. As odd as it sounds, Farrakhan has reiterated this in the press, including in a major profile in The New Yorker a few years ago.

Putting all that aside, Farrakahn believes Elijah Muhammad, the (by all accounts deceased) former leader of the Nation of Islam, is living on a spaceship circling the planet. Also, a few years after Elijah "died," the spaceship picked up Farrakhan and the two men had a nice chat with each other. Afterward, Farrakhan says the spaceship let him off near Washington, D.C.

The only major television journalist I've ever seen query Farrakhan about this stuff was Ted Koppel, host of ABCs "Nightline," in 1996. Koppel asked him about the spaceship stuff, saying, "It sounds like gibberish, but maybe you can explain it."

Farrakhan didn't back off. The spiritual leader explained that the huge spaceship is "over the heads of us in North America, and soon you shall see these (spaceships) over the major cities of America." This fact is being kept "above top-secret by the United States government."

Farrakhan didn't stop there. Offended at the "gibberish" remark, he fell back on some hard science: "And if it were gibberish, they made an awful lot of money, Mr. Koppel, on that movie called 'Independence Day' --- it flooded the theaters." Koppel conceded this point, but also alerted Farrakhan to the fact that "Independence Day" wasn't a true story.

Next time Farrakhan is on "Meet the Press," I, for one, would prefer to hear if Farrakhan thinks "Independence Day" was real-life documentary. I've heard enough of what he thinks of Jews.

To comment on JWR contributor Jonah Goldberg's column click here.


10/16/00: Secrets of election can be found in 'Star Trek'
10/12/00: Arafat hardly 'provoked' into violence
10/10/00: Undecided voters may be ignorant, not discriminating
10/06/00: The importance of character isn't debatable
10/03/00: Conservatives are the true friends of science You know why?
09/29/00: Symbolic 'born alive' vote makes sense
09/25/00: Conservatives adopt abandoned liberalism
09/21/00: Ventura's media backpedaling makes fiction of his new book
09/18/00: Tough questions target Hillary Clinton's elitism
09/14/00: Hollywood morality to blame
09/11/00: Specifically, AlGore's detailed plan is meaningless
09/07/00: Time-honored tradition: Insult the press
09/05/00: Scouting out justice
08/30/00: The ADL's historical revisionism
08/28/00: Sitcoms will survive, post-"Survivor"
08/24/00: Candidates' choice of movies shows refreshing honesty
08/21/00: An AlGore victory? Only if dead birds fly
08/17/00: AlGore is doomed, but Dems ignore warning signs
08/15/00: Proud and true: He's a Jew
08/10/00: Exploiting religion would be tragic mistake
08/08/00: Cheney serves up tempting appetizer
08/03/00: Republicans now 'nice,' media still nasty
08/01/00: Presidential campaign could use some anti-metric mania
07/27/00: Government shouldn't subsidize Reform Party
07/25/00: Campaign finance 'reform' gives too much power to liberal media
07/20/00: Hillary slur speaks volumes
07/18/00: AlGore's McCarthyism
07/11/00: 'Survivor' shows hypocrisy of animal rights groups
07/05/00: McDonald's deserves a break today
07/03/00: On July Fourth, time to reflect on America's founding
06/28/00: America bashing becomes international pastime
06/23/00: If Fonda is sorry, let her say so
06/06/00: NAPSTER exposes artists' hypocrisy
04/18/00: Not much difference between TV journalists, TV actors

© 2000, TMS