Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review June 1, 2001 / 10 Sivan, 5761

James K. Glassman

Jim Glassman
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Authentication tools opening up opportunities in online security --
WORRIED about using your credit card online? You shouldn’t. The risks to you are tiny, but that doesn’t mean that you should ignore this issue. In fact, there’s an interesting investment opportunity here.

The odds are that you’ll never be a victim of credit card fraud, and even if you are, the ultimate cost to you will be little or nothing. Under federal regulations, card companies can hold you responsible for only $50 of unauthorized use. Some card issuers like Visa go even further, offering “zero liability” to encourage consumer confidence. So if you use a Visa card, you won’t pay a nickel for the consequences of fraud.

In an era of exploding online commerce and countless media reports of identity theft, customer database hacking and other Internet shenanigans, it may surprise you to learn that credit card fraud is actually declining as a percentage of transaction volume. Still, the volume is huge. Visa alone handles $1.8 trillion of transactions every year, so even though fraud accounts for just 0.07 percent of that volume, we’re still talking about close to $1.3 billion. And fraud is more common online than offline, so as electronic commerce grows, this problem may loom larger. On top of that there’s a special problem for online merchants. They typically eat the costs of fraud because they never actually see a card – and that means that the card companies keep them on the hook for bogus charges. On the other hand, if a crook walks into a store and presents a stolen card, then Visa eats the tab, not the brick-and-mortar merchant.

The point here is that online businesses, not just card issuers, have a strong interest in making sure that their customers are legit. This interest goes well beyond credit cards. As more and more business moves online, it will become increasingly important to verify that people are who they claim to be, and that they really are committed to a transaction, even if they’re not physically signing their names to pieces of paper. In a world where fewer and fewer transactions will occur among people meeting face-to-face, authentication is key. It’s not just about cutting deals. Authentication is critical when allowing people access to information, which is increasingly stored in digital form and shared with people who aren’t walking into offices and showing their faces.

The clear leader in authentication and security software for Internet transactions is Verisign (VRSN). If you’re running a web business and you want to show customers that you offer secure e-commerce, you’re probably going to display the Verisign logo. The company’s products allow merchants to conduct web transactions while shielding the sensitive customer data from malicious hackers and to screen for potential cases of fraud. The company also offers products that allow people and companies to prove that they are who they claim to be, and to send encrypted communications that can’t be tampered with en route to their intended destinations. This is done with a digital ID, a special piece of software code that sits only in the web browser or e-mail program of the legitimate user.

Some smaller companies are tackling the next generation of authentication products: “biometrics.” You’ve probably seen biometric systems in sci-fi movies or James Bond flicks, but they’re beginning to make their way into everyday applications. Biometric devices use parts of a person’s body to verify his or her identity. These tools can scan a fingerprint, for example, or even the retina of an eye to authenticate the potential user of a computer or cell phone, or perhaps the visitor to a sensitive area. Bill Schaff, portfolio manager of the Berger Information Technology Fund, profiled several biometrics companies in a recent issue of the tech magazine Red Herring.

Schaff cites a report from market research firm IDC predicting that the biometric market, already a $166 million business in 1999, will grow to $1.8 billion by 2004. That’s a compound annual growth rate of 61%, so if IDC’s prediction holds up, this market represents an intriguing investment opportunity to say the least. According to IDC, the lion’s share of the biometrics market – 55%, or roughly $1 billion -- will go to fingerprint-recognition systems. Another 15% will go to voice-recognition systems, and the rest will be split among technologies that read faces, eyes, and hand geometry.

Sure, it’s a little creepy, and there will no doubt be a host of privacy issues surrounding these systems, but these technologies certainly offer clear advances for markets increasingly dependent on rock-solid authentication.

So which companies are in position to capitalize on this technology? According to Schaff, Identix (IDX) is the clear leader in fingerprint-recognition systems. Expect to see their touch-pad scanners attached to laptops, wireless phones, and other electronic gear. Among companies developing voice-recognition systems, Nuance Communications (NUAN) and SpeechWorks International (SPWX) have had early successes, while Visionics (VSNX) has grabbed a leadership position in the budding market for facial-recognition systems. These are all small-cap companies that have been losing money in a very young market. So they carry a good deal of risk, but also opportunity for the long-term investor.

JWR contributor James K. Glassman is the host of Tech Central Station. Comment by clicking here.


05/25/01: 'Price gouging' doesn’t cut it as reason for rising energy prices
05/21/01: Banking on High-Tech Education
05/17/01: It's No Time to Go Wobbly on Kyoto
05/02/01: Diversify with tech’s leaders
04/26/01: To Revive The New Economy, Release A Chokehold   —   Break Up The Bells
04/24/01: Who’s To Blame For Broadband Crisis? Wired Article Points To Bells
04/19/01: The Bush Budget
04/12/01: To revive The New Economy, release a chokehold --- break up the Bells
04/04/01: Even as stocks have fallen, the Net keeps booming
03/28/01: Where’s The Profit In Biotech Future?
03/22/01: The Joy of Debt: The last thing we should want is a U.S. Treasury flush with cash
03/19/01: 'Defensive' Stocks in the NASDAQ
03/15/01: Bush administration must say no to Jane and Kyoto
03/08/01: Time to buy small caps? Consider these five great techs
03/01/01: Bill’s and Larry’s continued political adventures
02/26/01: Chips on the Dips?
02/23/01: How Tauzin Can Keep His Word And Stop Telecom "Remonopolization"
02/13/01: Consumers, WAKE UP! Middlemen are ripping you off
02/02/01: Publicity-Seeking Politicians and Contingency-Fee Lawyers Corrupt the Law
01/26/01: DoubleClick, eBay And Their Promising Ilk
01/24/01: Will Cyberspace Look Like France or America?
12/27/00: Cut interest, taxes and regulation to save high-tech economy
12/20/00: Close, But No Big Czar
12/15/00: A Down Year? Maybe. But Let’s Put It in Perspective
12/13/00: Clinton’s sorry midnight race into history
12/07/00: Is Telecom’s Future The Bells, The Bells, and Only The Bells?
12/01/00: Money talks and walks in election aftermath
11/29/00: Climate Treaty Deadlock Shows Lack of Consensus and Common Sense
11/23/00: Climate change participants don’t listen to reasons for uncertainty
11/21/00: Will Regulators Create a Recession?
11/14/00: The Election and the Market
10/26/00: Hang on for the long term
10/25/00: On privacy, one size doesn’t fit all
10/24/00: Perish the bearish thought
10/19/00: Beating hunger --- the biggest prize
10/13/00: Way to play biotech
10/12/00: Bush vs. Gore on Technology
10/11/00: Global Climate Scare: Fools Rush In
10/05/00: Avoid the Apple Trap
10/03/00: Goodbye, anti-Microsoft crusader --- and good riddance
09/29/00: Should You Invest in Tech IPOs?
09/27/00: Could technology end airline delays?
09/22/00: Don’t Forget Small Caps
09/20/00: Is the New York Times Rooting for Disaster?
09/13/00: The Best Argument Against Net Regulation
08/30/00: Political Risk in Big Drug Stocks
07/27/00: Tech Dividends
07/25/00: Government Privacy Violators
07/20/00: If I Had to Pick One Tech Stock
07/18/00: Our Favorite Lawsuit
07/13/00: Silicon Valley East
07/11/00: Election 2000: Year of the Investor Class?
07/07/00: Adventures on the
07/06/00:The Difference Between Bill Gates and Larry Ellison
06/29/00: In the Chips
06/27/00: Free market wins in Federal Court!
06/22/00: Wireless Bargains?
06/20/00: Is Your SUV Warming the Planet?
06/15/00: Shopping for Government
06/13/00: Top 10 Tech Stocks
06/08/00: Riding the eBook Wave
06/06/00: "The Last Mile"
06/02/00: Keep Buying!
05/31/00: Who Asked the FTC to Regulate Online Privacy?
05/25/00: "When It’s Time to Sell"
05/23/00: End the "Telephone Tax"
05/16/00: Time Warner Gets a Bad Rap

© 2000, Tech Central Station