' Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.

Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review July 9, 2002 /29 Tamuz, 5762

Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.

JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

See no evil?

http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | The FBI's depiction of the murderous 4th of July attack at Los Angeles International (LAX) must have struck most Americans as utterly bizarre. After all, it occurred on a day when the entire country was on alert for terrorist attacks; it was conducted by an Egyptian immigrant, Hesham Mohamed Hadayet, armed with two handguns and a knife; and, but for the rapid and effective action of an El Al security guard, Hadayet's premeditated assault would have succeeded in killing far more than the two innocent civilians whose lives he brutally cut short.

This would, on its face, seem to fit the profile -- pardon the politically incorrect term -- of terrorism perpetrated by Arabs against Israelis and Americans with which the world has become all too familiar in recent years.

Yet the FBI has repeatedly declined to describe this incident as an act of terrorism. Its spokesmen insisted that Hadayet could not be classified as a terrorist because, as one put it to the Los Angeles Times, the Bureau "does not use the term to describe every violent act an individual commits against a state entity or racial group." Others argued that the LAX shooter did not qualify because he appeared to have acted alone and was not on any of the U.S. government's "watch lists" for individuals associated with terror organizations. The same could have been said of Timothy McVeigh.

Interestingly, the LA Times reported on Saturday that, in so doing, "the FBI seemed to ignore its own definition of terrorism in favor of a more limited State Department definition. That meaning holds that terrorism is perpetrated 'by sub-national groups or clandestine agents.' FBI officials repeatedly emphasized Friday that Hadayet had no known connection with Islamic terrorist organizations." This seems suspicious on two grounds:

First, there is evidence that Hadayet was connected to al Qaeda. On Sunday, the Arabic London-based Al Hayat reported that the shooter was a member of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad and that he had met Dr. Ayman Zuwahri, the Islamic Jihad leader who became Osama bin Laden's deputy, in California -- not once but twice in California, in 1995 and again in 1998.

Taken together with other aspects of Hadayet's background -- notably that he reportedly had worked at LAX for five years in the employ of a ground service company until he aroused El Al's suspicions and that he then left to run a limousine service that afforded him continued, regular access to airport terminals -- raises suspicions that the gunman might have been a "sleeper" agent for al Qaeda. We are in serious trouble if, in light of the distinct possibility that there may be many such unidentified sleepers in this country, the FBI is not fully alert to this danger.

Second, there are other grounds for concern that more than State Department politicization is compromising the Bureau's vigilance towards Islamists in this country -- fanatics who interpret Mohammed's teachings to justify violent holy war ("jihad") against non-Muslims. On June 28, FBI Director Robert Mueller dignified the American Muslim Council, a group long associated with Islamist causes and known terrorist groups, by addressing its annual convention in Washington. In the face of intense criticism over such legitimation, Mr. Mueller felt compelled to acknowledge that "persons associated with this organization have in the past made statements that indicate support for terrorism and for terrorist organizations." This statement could only be true if, as the FBI's recent mischaracterization of Hadayet's actions suggests, the official definition of terrorism is being altered significantly. For the American Muslim Council continues to associate with individuals and groups -- some of whom actually appeared on the same stage as did Director Mueller -- who support terrorist organizations like Hamas, Hezbollah and Islamic Jihad.

This is, in short, not simply a matter of semantics. It is a question of whether our top law enforcement agency -- and, for that matter, the Bush Administration more generally -- comprehend the true character of the threat posed by Islamist terrorism.

Concerns on this score can only be heightened as Administration officials meet this week with a self-described "goodwill" delegation sponsored by the Muslim World League (MWL). The MWL is an organization founded in 1962 in Saudi Arabia to spread the Wahhabist strain of Islamism throughout the world. The one-time head of its Pakistan office, Wa'il Jalaidan, was a co-founder with bin Laden of al Qaeda. The MWL's office in Northern Virginia was among those raided by federal agents on March 20, 2002 on suspicion of ties to terrorism.

This delegation purportedly represents a cross-section of the "scholars, leaders and jurists from the Muslim world" and is to visit four U.S. cities, starting with Washington, D.C. Yet, it is led by Dr. Abdullah al-Turki, the head of the Muslim World League and formerly a Saudi Minister of Islamic Affairs. In both capacities he has been a driving force behind Wahhabi proselytizing worldwide (including the Saudi-financed construction of some 1500 mosques since 1950, school construction, "research" entities, etc.) and assuring the uniformity and "purity" of the materials distributed throughout the Muslim and non-Muslim world. It is unlikely that moderate Muslims or their views are going to be much in evidence in any delegation he sponsors.

Worse yet, the "scholars" that Dr. al-Turki will be trotting around the United States this week presumably share the view expressed by a six-day conference of such folks held in January in Mecca. While the conferees sponsored by the MWL's Islamic Fiqh (Jurisprudence) Academy duly condemned "terrorism," they made clear that they too have their own definition -- one that excludes holy wars: "Jihad is meant for upholding right, ending injustice, ensuring peace and security and establishing mercy. Terrorism and violence committed by the aggressor who usurp the land, desecrate holy sanctuaries and loot wealth cannot be compared to the practice [of] the right of legitimate defense as used by the oppressed seeking to gain their legitimate rights to self-determination."

Clearly, such a definition of terrorism fits the Wahhabists and other Islamists' interests. But it certainly is not compatible with ours -- and must not be allowed to color our understanding of the evil we now confront in many forms and guises.

Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor Frank J. Gaffney, Jr. heads the Center for Security Policy. Send your comments to him by clicking here.


07/02/02: Rethinking peacekeeping
06/25/02: Political moment of truth on defense
06/19/02: Inviting losses on two fronts
06/12/02: Make missile defense happen
06/04/02: The next 'Day of Infamy'?
05/29/02: Bush's Russian gamble
05/21/02: The 'next war'
05/15/02: Ex-presidential misconduct
05/07/02: When 'what if' is no game
05/02/02: Careful what we wish for
04/24/02: The real 'root cause' of terror
04/02/02: First principles in the Mideast
03/26/02: 'Renounce this map'
03/20/02: The inconvenient ally
03/12/02: Adults address the 'unthinkable'
03/05/02: The Saudi scam
02/26/02: Rumsfeld's 'now hear this'
02/19/02: Where's the outrage?
02/12/02: Post-mortem on 'Pearl Harbor II'
02/05/02: Spinning on the 'Evil Axis'
01/29/02: A challenge for the history books
01/22/02: Who pulled the plug on the Chinese 'bugs'?
01/15/02: No 'need to know'
01/08/02: Sentenced to de-nuclearize?
12/18/01: Missile defense mismanagement?
12/11/01: Is the Cold War 'over'?
12/04/01: A moment for truth
11/29/01: Send in the marines -- with the planes they need
11/27/01: 'Now Hear This': Does the President Mean What He Says?
11/20/01: Mideast 'vision thing'
11/13/01: The leitmotif of the next three days
11/06/01: Bush's Reykjavik Moment
10/30/01: Say it ain't true, 'W.
10/23/01: Getting history, and the future, right
10/16/01: Farewell to arms control
10/05/01: A time to choose
09/25/01: Don't drink the 'lemonade'
09/11/01: Sudan envoy an exercise in futility?
09/05/01: Strategy of a thousand cuts
08/28/01: Rummy's back
08/21/01: Prepare for 'two wars'
08/14/01: Why does the Bush Administration make a moral equivalence between terrorist attacks and Israel's restrained defensive responses?
08/07/01: A New bipartisanship in security policy?
07/31/01: Don't go there
07/17/01: The 'end of the beginning'
07/10/01: Testing President Bush
07/03/01: Market transparency works
06/27/01: Which Bush will it be on missile defense?
06/19/01: Don't politicize military matters
06/05/01: It's called leadership
06/05/01: With friends like these ...
05/31/01: Which way on missile defense?
05/23/01: Pearl Harbor, all over again
05/15/01: A tale of two Horatios
05/08/01: The real debate about missile defense
04/24/01: Sell aegis ships to Taiwan
04/17/01: The 'hi-tech for China' bill
04/10/01: Deal on China's hostages -- then what?
04/03/01: Defense fire sale redux
03/28/01: The defense we need
03/21/01: Critical mass
03/13/01: The Bush doctrine
03/08/01: Self-Deterred from Defending America
02/27/01: Truth and consequences for Saddam
02/21/01: Defense fire sale
02/13/01: Dubya's Marshall Plan
02/05/01: Doing the right thing on an 'Arab-Arab dispute'
01/30/01: The missile defense decision
01/23/01: The Osprey as Phoenix
01/17/01: Clinton's Parting Shot at Religious Freedom
01/09/01: Wake-up call on space
01/02/01: Secretary Rumsfeld
12/27/00: Redefining our Ukraine policy
12/19/00: Deploy missile defense now
12/12/00: Sabotaging space power
12/05/00: Preempting Bush
11/28/00: What Clinton hath wrought
11/21/00: HE'S BAAAACK
11/14/00: The world won't wait

© 2001, Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.