|
Jewish World Review /Sept. 18, 1998/ 27 Elul 5758
Larry Elder
It's the perjury, stupid
"NO MATTER HOW YOU SLICE IT," said a friend, "it's still about sex."
My friend, of course, refers to the Ken Starr Report, which alleges perjury, subornation
of perjury, witness-tampering, and obstruction of justice on the part of President
Clinton. Initial polls suggest that my friend's attitude reflects the majority view.
Over 60 percent of Americans approve the president's performance in office, while a
majority believe him unfit to serve as a moral leader.
But, according to one poll, nearly half believe the president should resign if he
encouraged others to lie under oath.
Well, the evidence set forth by the Independent Counsel makes a persuasive argument
that the president, in fact, did encourage others to lie. The president allowed his
attorney, in the Paula Jones case, to submit an affidavit signed by Monica Lewinsky. The
affidavit denied any kind of sexual relationship with the president. The president knew
the affidavit to be false when he both denied a sexual relationship in a civil deposition,
as well as before the criminal grand jury.
The report accuses Clinton of leading Monica Lewinsky through a series of false, uh,
"suggestions" for the sake, it clearly appears, of shaping her testimony.
The president, while admitting an "inappropriate relationship" with Monica Lewinsky
maintains that he did not commit perjury when he denied a sexual relationship during
his deposition in the Jones case. Clinton bases his denial on the definition set forth in
the Jones case: "A person engages in 'sexual relations' when the person knowingly
engages in or causes -- (1) contact with the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or
buttocks of any person with an intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any
person ... 'contact' means intentional touching, either directly or through clothing."
So, based on Clintonesque logic, Monica Lewinsky had sex with the president, but the
president did not have sex with her.
Yet Lewinsky, in the report by Ken Starr, alleges that the president touched and fondled
her -- conduct and contact that clearly fall within the Jones definition of sex.
Does this mean, a reporter asked one of the president's lawyers, that Monica Lewinsky
is lying? Well, said the Clinton defender, we've not "trashed" Ms. Lewinsky in seven
months, and we don't intend to start now.
Oh, really? See page 88 of the report's section on the president's relationship with
Monica Lewinsky.
Following the president's deposition, Clinton said to attack-dog-aide Sidney
Blumenthal, "I haven't done anything wrong ... Monica Lewinsky came on to me and
made a sexual demand on me." The president said that he "rebuffed her," ... and that
Ms. Lewinsky had "threatened him. She said that she would tell people they'd had an
affair, that she was known as a stalker among her peers, and that she hated it, and if she
had an affair, or said she had an affair, then she wouldn't be the stalker any more."
Even now, Clinton shifts blame. At a prayer breakfast meeting, Clinton apologizes and
asks for forgiveness from, among other people, Monica Lewinsky and her family. Yet, in
the same breath, he says that he expects to mount a "vigorous defense" against
allegations of criminal wrongdoing.
And now the White House adds a new line of attack -- that the Ken Starr Report contains
unnecessarily explicit material, designed solely to embarrass the president. Presidential
lawyer David Kendall accused the Ken Starr Report of being "personal." Perhaps Kendall
meant the report describes "personal" activity. But Kendall's words implied that Ken
Starr simply continues his vendetta in submitting a report that some say borders on
pornographic.
Never mind that the president practically demanded the inclusion of this material by
denying perjury, and by refusing to answer specific questions during the grand jury
testimony. But, wait, didn't the president already admit this? No, he didn't. He admitted
an "inappropriate" relationship, but denied perjury. It is, therefore, necessary to include
details to demonstrate that, even under the Jones definition, the president did have a
sexual relationship, and, therefore, committed perjury.
Pre-Starr Report, the line was "let's wait and see how Starr spent four years and $40
million." Well, the report comes out, and the same crowd yells, "Too much detail!"
In 1974, during the height of Watergate, a young Congressional candidate said, "Yes, the
president should resign. He has lied to the American people, time and time again, and
betrayed their trust. He is no longer an effective leader. Since he has admitted guilt,
there is no reason to put the American people through an impeachment. He will serve
absolutely no purpose in finishing out his term; the only possible solution is for the
president to save some dignity and resign." The speaker? Bill Clinton.
It was good advice then, and it's good advice
914/98: The "Larry List" of the most fascinating women in politics
9/07/98: Why blacks shouldn't support Clinton
8/27/98:The Brown bomber strikes Justice Thomas
8/21/98:So very clintonesque
8/17/98: Gary Coleman, hate criminal?
8/07/98: How much mea culpa?
7/24/98: ATM Al?
7/24/98: Advising the advisors
7/17/98: Camille Cosby's carelessness
7/9/98: Moses mugged
7/2/98: Al Campanis -- forever a racist?
6/25/98: And you thought "coke" was worse than smokes
6/19/98: Is Jasper ‘America'?
6/12/98: Guess who's not coming to dinner
6/5/98: What now, NOW?
5/29/98:What's next, ‘burger busters'?
5/21/98: 'Stuff' happens
5/18/98: This just in
5/11/98: Stepping up
4/30/98: Who's faking whom?
4/23/98:PRESIDENTIAL HOOP DREAMS
4/16/98:To spank or not to spank
4/10/98:TWA: TEACHING WHILE ASIAN