Clicking on banner ads keeps JWR alive
Jewish World Review Nov. 26, 2001 / 11 Kislev, 5762

Debra J. Saunders

Debra J. Saunders
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Guns and abayas -- WHILE you're digesting your turkey with your family, close to a thousand women are serving their country from Saudi Arabia. Figure that they're not thanking their stars that they have to wear an abaya -- a black burqa-like head-to-toe covering and scarf -- when they leave their military bases.

In April, Air Force Lt. Col. Martha McSally went public to protest U.S. military orders that she must wear an abaya when off-base in Saudi Arabia. The brass also forbade McSally -- the first woman in the Air Force to fly a combat mission into enemy territory -- to drive a car; she had to sit in the backseat in Saudia Arabia.

She's a pilot who has helped protect the Persian Gulf from aggression -- and her reward for her service is to be treated as a lesser human being. "I am certainly willing to suck it up with the rest of the troops in some harsh condition when we are all treated the same," McSally told USA Today. "But when you separate your troops into two groups and then impose the values of your host nation on one of them, to me that is abandoning your American values."

Other servicewomen disagree. Air Force Maj. Lisa Caldwell, for example, told USA Today, that the abaya policy is a way of showing "respect for Islamic law and Arabic customs." And: "I am a guest here and want to blend into the culture."

On the one hand, the Defense Department would not allow a host country to baldly discriminate, say, against African American troops stationed abroad.

On the other hand, America needs positive relations with its Islamic allies.

It doesn't help if U.S. policies undermine their unequal treatment of women.

Besides, it's not the clothing to which the likes of the Saudi-born Osama bin Laden object -- it's the freedom.

After McSally went public, five Republican U.S. senators -- including Jesse Helms of North Caroline -- asked Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to review the policy.

On Tuesday, White House aides Karen Hughes and Paula Dobriansky held a conference call touting the White House campaign to discredit the Taliban's War Against Women. They discussed the great oppression imposed by the Taliban on Afghan women -- far worse than anything McSally ever experienced -- who were denied the ability to support their children and were prevented from getting needed medical treatment.

As long as the United States is pushing for women's rights in Afghanistan, I asked, was the White House reconsidering its Saudi abaya policy? Will female troops in Central Asia have to wear veils off-base?

"I think that's a matter of policy for the Defense Department," answered Hughes.

Defense Department spokeswoman Victoria Clarke said the Saudi abaya policy was under review before the September 11 attacks. Clarke knew of no similar Pakistan policy. She added that female troops stationed there haven't had time to leave the base.

Some hawks might argue that the mission is what counts most in war. Thus, female troops should endure second-class treatment for the greater good. I wonder if they'd say that if male soldiers abroad had to wear 4-inch long beards.

Other defenders of the status quo point out that Muslim cultures are more modest, that polite guests have an obligation to, as they say, do as the Romans do. Otherwise, our troops come across as Ugly Americans.

Some women in the military would add that the abaya policy saves them from being beaten by the matawa, the Saudi religious police.

The thing is, female U.S. State Department workers in Saudi Arabia don't wear the abaya on official calls. Surely the Bush administration can come up with an off-base dress code that, State Department-like, instructs both men and women to dress modestly, cover up from head to toe and wear a hat or scarf.

Servicewomen who want to wear an abaya when out-of-uniform would be free to do so.

It's reveille. The Bush administration has spent two months pointing at burqas as proof that the Taliban are despots. Now that women in Kabul are free, maybe the Bush Pentagon can do the same for the American women serving in Saudi Arabia.

Comment JWR contributor Debra J. Saunders's column by clicking here.


11/21/01Depraved minds think alike
11/19/01 Guilty, a la carte
11/14/01 Interpreting the entrails of Election 2000
11/12/01 Life and liberty
11/09/01 Safety is as safety does
11/07/01 More hot air on global warming
11/05/01 Bumped Pakistani's molehill
11/01/01 Freedom snuffed out
10/29/01 Give war a chance
10/26/01 Airline bill needs liftoff
10/22/01 The Riordan Principle
10/19/01 Before America gets tired of the war on terrorism
10/17/01 Patriot games
10/15/01 I was a 'McCainiac,' and I have seen the light
10/12/01 University of Censorship's fall semester
10/11/01 Poor little rich boy, Osama
10/07/01 Don't feed Israel to the beast
10/05/01: bin Laden is not our Frankenstein monster
10/04/01: Where no man has gone before
09/26/01: Who's bloodthirsty?
09/26/01: What's to understand?
09/20/01: Barbara Lee's line in the sand
09/14/01: You gotta love this country
09/13/01: ENTER TERROR
09/11/01: You can't clone ethics
09/06/01: NOW's goal: equal rights for women without equal responsibility
08/30/01: What's love got to do with it?
08/24/01: A clean, well-lighted place for junkies
08/20/01: Bush should stand up for justice
08/08/01: Don't give Peace (Dept). a chance
08/03/01: Lose a kid, pass a law
08/01/01: Welcome to France, killers
07/30/01: Why it's easy being green (in Europe)
07/26/01: If disabled means expendable
07/23/01: Condit should not resign
07/18/01: Feinstein should learn her limit
07/16/01: A drought of common sense
07/13/01: The catalog has no clothes
07/05/01: It's Bush against the planet
07/03/01: The man who would be guv
06/29/01: Wheeled, wired and free
06/27/01: O, fearful new world
06/25/01: End HMO horrors
06/21/01: Either they're dishonest or clueless
06/18/01: Freedom is a puff of smoke
06/15/01: In praise of going heavy: Yes, you can take it all
06/13/01: McVeigh: 'Unbowed' maybe, but dead for sure
06/11/01: Gumby strikes back
06/08/01: Los Angeles' last white mayor?
06/07/01: Kids will be kids, media will be media
06/04/01: Draw a line in the sand
05/30/01: Just don't call him a moderate
05/29/01: Operation: Beat up on civil rights
05/24/01: Of puppies, kittens and huge credit-card debts
05/22/01: Bush needs an energy tinkerbell
05/18/01: Divided we stand, united they fall
05/16/01: Big Bench backs might over right
05/15/01: Close SUV loophole
05/11/01: Kill the test, welcome failure
05/09/01: DA mayor's disappointing legacy
05/07/01: If it ain't broken ...
05/03/01: They shoot civilians, don't they?
04/30/01: Executions are not for prime time
04/12/01: White House and the green myth
04/10/01: The perjurer as celeb
04/04/01: Bush bashers don't know squat
04/02/01: Drugging our oldsters
03/30/01: Robert Lee Massie exercises his death wish
03/28/01: Cheney's nuclear reactor
03/26/01: Where California and Mexico meet
03/16/01: Boy's sentence was no accident
03/14/01: Soft money, hard reform
03/12/01: Banks, big credit lines and consumer bankruptcy
03/09/01: Free speech dies in Berkeley
03/02/01: When rats have rights
02/28/01: Move a frog, go to jail?
02/26/01: They knew they'd get away with it
02/20/01: How Dems define tax fairness
02/16/01: The jackpot casino Carmel tribe?
02/14/01: You can fight school success
02/12/01: Hannibal -- with guts this time
02/08/01: A family of jailbirds
02/05/01: Reality's most demeaning TV moments
02/01/01: Justice for the non-Rich
01/26/01: Hail to the chiefs of D.C. opinion
01/24/01: A day of mud and monuments
01/22/01: Diversity, division, de-lovely D.C.
01/19/01: Parties agree: Give back the money
01/17/01: Get tough with the oil companies, or forget pumping more Alaskan crude
01/15/01: Mineta better pray that no attending confirmation senator has ever driven to San Jose during rush hour
01/12/01: Europeans should look in the mirror
01/10/01: Dems' reasons for dissin' Dubya's picks
01/08/01: Jerry, curb your guru
01/03/01: A foe of Hitler and friend of Keating
12/28/00: Nice people think nice thoughts
12/26/00: The Clinton years: Epilogue
12/21/00: 'Tis the season to free nonviolent drug offenders 12/18/00: A golden opportunity is squandered
12/15/00: You can take the 24 years, good son
12/13/00: Court of law vs. court of public opinion
12/08/00: A salvo in the war on the war on drugs
12/06/00: Don't cry, Butterfly: Big trees make great decks
12/04/00: Florida: Don't do as Romans did
11/30/00: Special City's hotel parking ticket
11/27/00: No means yes, yes means more than yes
11/22/00: The bench, the ballot and fairness
11/20/00: Mendocino, how green is your ballot?

© 2000, Creators Syndicate