Jewish World Review Sept. 11, 2003 / 14 Elul, 5763

Jack Kelly

Jack Kelly
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Guaranteeing the terrorists return | On the second anniversary of Sept. 11, 2001, Americans feel considerably more secure than they did in the immediate aftermath of the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

There is a good reason for this. Since Sept. 11, 2001, there have been no successful terrorist attacks on American soil. Since Sept. 11, 2001, there have been no successful major terrorist attacks against American targets anywhere in the world.

It is worth reflecting for a moment on why this is so.

We cannot attribute the absence of bloodshed to a change of heart on the part of our attackers. The tapes allegedly made by Osama bin Laden which are played periodically on Arab television networks contain more dire threats than ever. If he could hurt us, he would.

So why hasn't al Qaida struck again?

It could be luck, or:

  • It could be because al Qaida has lost its bases and protectors in Afghanistan and Iraq.

  • It could be because two thirds of the known al Qaida leadership is in prison, or dead, and the remainder spend more time looking over their shoulders than they do in plotting future attacks.

  • It could be because the FBI and other law enforcement agencies have uncovered and disrupted more than 100 al Qaida plots.

  • It could be because the new Department of Homeland Security has dramatically reduced the number of "soft" targets in the U.S. Let's suppose these last four reasons have something to do with why we haven't been attacked since Sept. 11, 2001. Now let us imagine what the situation would be like if Al Gore had been elected president in 2000. If Gore were president:

  • Would the Taliban still be in power in Afghanistan? Would Saddam Hussein still be in power in Iraq? Given what Gore and other prominent Democrats have said about the Afghan and Iraq wars, the answers to these questions probably is yes.

  • Would the Patriot Act, which removed foolish barriers to the sharing of information among intelligence agencies, and thus made possible the disruption of more than 100 al Qaida plots, have been enacted into law? Given that Gore and other Democrats have described the Patriot Act as the greatest threat to civil liberties since the Alien and Sedition Acts, the answer is probably no.

  • Would the Department of Homeland Security have been as effective as it apparently has been? Given that Democrats in Congress were more interested in protecting union rules than in getting the right people into the right positions as quickly as possible, the answer is probably no. Despite evident success in the war on terror, and a reviving economy, President Bush's job approval ratings have been slipping. Dick Morris, who guided Bill Clinton to victories in 1992 and 1996, thinks this is precisely because Americans now feel more secure.

Donate to JWR

But terror can return as swiftly as it receded if policies change.

Iraq, by accident or design, has become the central battlefield in the war on terror. Operatives from al Qaida and Hezbollah are being drawn there, like moths to a flame. By engaging them there, we keep them out of New York and Washington. And if democracy takes root in Iraq, the terror-supporting regimes in Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia are doomed.

The Iraq policy of all the Democratic presidential candidates, save Sen. Joe Lieberman, is camouflaged surrender. Turn the country over to the United Nations, and then leave. This would please the French. But is America made more secure by winning the approval of the French, or by relentlessly pursuing our enemies?

America's foreign policy defeats, from Vietnam onward, have all been failures of political will. Our soldiers have demonstrated in Afghanistan and Iraq that the war on terror cannot be lost on the battlefield. But it can be lost at the ballot box.

The war on terror is well begun. But it is far from over. If we declare victory and go home, we can be sure the terrorists will follow us back here.

Every weekday publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor Jack Kelly, a former Marine and Green Beret, was a deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force in the Reagan administration. Comment by clicking here.

Jack Kelly Archives

© 2003, Jack Kelly