Jewish World Review Sept. 24, 2001 / 7 Tishrei 5762

Clarence Page

Clarence Page
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

How to catch an elusive terrorist -- HOLD onto your cloaks and daggers, folks. Tracking down Osama bin Laden and breaking up his terrorist network may require the help of some "unsavory characters," the kind who violate human rights at one time or another.

That's what Vice President Dick Cheney said in a recent interview on NBC's "Meet the Press." After all, he noted, sometimes espionage is "a mean, nasty, dangerous, dirty business."

He's right about that. Recent terrorism attacks have reignited an old debate. How much should we loosen the handcuffs on our overseas operatives?

Former President George Bush, who also was a former CIA director, and some other former insiders have attacked guidelines that regulate the recruitment of sources who have a history of criminal activity and human-rights violations.

Calling the guidelines, which were put into place in 1995, "ridiculous," former CIA chief James Woolsey said on CNN that the policies were "like telling the FBI to penetrate the mafia without putting any criminals on its payrolls."

Well, not quite. Nothing in the guidelines forbids placing unsavory sources on the CIA's payroll. The rules merely require officers to alert their supervisors beforehand.

Cooler heads in the CIA actually see the guidelines as a safety net. Without hampering covert operations, the guidelines help provide cover to agents when a questionable character turns out to be an embarrassment.

Embarrassments do happen. Everyone knows that the CIA has worked with numerous unsavory characters over the years. It is a part of the craft of spying. Sometimes it takes a thief to catch a thief--or a terrorist to catch a terrorist.

Sometimes one government's information source can be another government's terrorist.

Or you can have a "blowback" problem, which occurs when the chickens you put out during one operation come home to roost in deadly ways years later.

Or you can have a "disposal" problem, which is what happens when an operation is over and you end up leaving your local sources to fend for themselves.

In fact, one blowback-producing character whom we left out like that was a guy named Osama bin Laden.

Yes, the heir to a wealthy Saudi family (which has since disowned him) was one of many bright, young, religiously inclined men who Pakistan's intelligence agency recruited and trained--with CIA assistance--in the late 1970s to fight the Soviet Union in Afghanistan.

Significantly, it was not a right-wing warmonger who got us into Afghanistan, but that emperor of peace, President Jimmy Carter.

At National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski's urging, Carter signed the directive to supply covert aid to the young mujahedeen ("holy warrior") movement.

After the 1980 election, Ronald Reagan's administration eagerly embraced the policy. With American money, data and Stinger missiles, the CIA helped the mujahedeen knock down hundreds of Russian helicopters in a 10-year war.

But once the mujahedeen rid themselves of the Soviets, who surrendered in 1989, the Americans were done with the mujahedeen.

We pulled out and the Taliban moved in. With help from Pakistan and the Saudis, the Taliban grew from an obscure puritanical sect of religious students into a pro-Islamic ally for Pakistan against India.

Elsewhere, bin Laden and many others returned to their homelands where they ignited a new wave of militant Islamic fundamentalism throughout the 1990s across the Muslim world.

Occasional headlines of death and destruction in Algeria, Egypt, Chechnya, the Philippines and elsewhere made little dent in the attention of most Americans as we enjoyed the prosperity of the 1990s.

Now, recent terrorist attacks in our own country have resulted in a new war on terrorism that sounds like an international toxic waste cleanup.

At the center of it is bin Laden, an unsavory character worth catching by any means necessary. Americans paid a terrible price for the failure of the FBI, CIA and others to keep track of the international terrorist network.

Now we have a lot of catching up to do in about 50 countries or more. That's how wide the post-Afghan terrorist networks have spread. No one should be surprised if our operatives employ "unsavory characters" to gain crucial information.

But history tells us we should be careful in this dangerous game. Our questionable friends can help us solve an old problem, then help create a brand new one.

Comment on JWR contributor Clarence Page's column by clicking here.


09/21/01: The war I was waiting for
09/17/01: When rage turns to hate
09/13/01: Terror attack tests US, let's give right response
09/06/01: U.S. should have stayed and argued
09/04/01: Columbine killer's parents get upclose and personal
08/31/01: Virtual kids? Log me out
08/28/01: Two Africans, one black, one white, same fight
08/23/01: Sharpton for president
08/20/01: Shaking up the rules on keeping secrets
08/16/01: Bush's u-turn on racial goals
08/09/01: Outsider Bubba comes 'in' again
08/06/01: Not ready for 'color-blindness' yet
08/02/01: Immigration timing couldn't be better
07/26/01: Summer of Chandra: An international traveler's perspective
07/17/01: Overthrowing a régime is only the beginning
07/10/01: Big Brother is watching you, fining you
07/05/01: Can blacks be patriotic? Should they be?
06/19/01: Get 'real' about marriage
06/12/01: Amos, Andy and Tony Soprano
06/07/01: Getting tough with the Bush Twins
06/05/01: Bringing marriage back into fashion
05/31/01: "Ken" and "Johnnie": The odd-couple legal team
05/24/01: Sharpton's challenge to Jackson
05/22/01: Test scores equal (a) MERIT? (b) MENACE? (c) ALL OF ABOVE?
05/17/01: Anti-pot politics squeeze the ill
05/15/01: Was Babe Ruth black?
05/10/01: U.N.'s torture caucus slaps Uncle Sam
05/08/01: 'The Sopranos' a reflection of our times
05/03/01: 'Free-fire' zones, then and now
05/01/01: War on drugs misfires against students
04/26/01: Another athlete gets foot-in-mouth disease
04/23/01: 'Slave' boat mystery reveals real tragedy
04/19/01: McVeigh's execution show
04/12/01: Not this time, Jesse
04/05/01: Dubya is DEFINITELY his own man, you fools!
04/02/01: Milking MLK
03/29/01: The candidate who censored himself?
03/22/01: "Will Hispanics elbow blacks out of the way as the nation's most prominent minority group?"
03/19/01: Blacks and the SATs
03/15/01: The census: How much race still matters in the everyday life of America
03/12/01: Jesse is a victim!
03/08/01: Saving kids from becoming killers
03/01/01: Parents owe "Puffy" and Eminem our thanks

© 2001 TMS