August 9th, 2022


Gender Is a Construct --- Except When It's Not

Heather Mac Donald

By Heather Mac Donald City Journal

Published August 20,2018

Gender Is a Construct --- Except When It's Not

A foundational tenet of academic feminism holds that alleged differences between males and females are socially constructed. This credo usually maximizes the opportunities for charging sexism, yet it will be discarded in an instant if acknowledging the innate biological and psychological differences between men and women yields an additional trove of feminist complaint. The current issue of the Yale Alumni Magazine shows how the game is played.

For years, medical research neglected "sex and gender differences" in health, according to the magazine. "Historically, the narrative of medicine has been driven by data derived from white men around the age of 40," the associate dean for curriculum at the Yale Medical School told the magazine's reporter. Clinical trials only occasionally included females and when they did, the results were rarely analyzed by sex. It's mysterious why this alleged neglect should matter, if sex differences are "socially constructed." If males and females are the same psychologically and physically before the patriarchy starts assigning sex roles, then medical research need not distinguish between males and females, either.

It turns out, however, that males and females differentially respond to stress, environmental risk factors, drugs, and disease, as an initiative called Women's Health Research at Yale devotes itself to documenting. Among the relevant findings:

Two-thirds of all Alzheimer's patients are female;

Seventy-five percent of people with autoimmune disorders are female;

Females are less likely to develop Parkinson's disease;

Adult females have twice the rate of depression as adult males;

Females have outbreaks of genital herpes at higher rates than males;

Male and female brains respond differently to early childhood neglect, with males losing gray matter in areas governing impulse control and females losing gray matter in areas governing emotion;

Women are more likely to abuse alcohol after trauma;

Males and females smoke for different reasons and have correspondingly different success rates with the nicotine patch;

The X and Y sex chromosomes, whose pairing determines a person's sex, influence how the other 23 chromosomes in each cell read the genetic instructions contained in DNA.

Such discoveries should be the death knell for social constructivism. Along with many others like them, they buttress the possibility that uneven sex ratios in various fields are in part the result of males and females' different average dispositions toward competition, risk, and abstract rather than people-centered work (an observation that got computer engineer James Damore fired from Google).

And yet, feminist social-justice warriors are perfectly capable of proceeding on several contradictory fronts simultaneously. Even as the director of the Women's Health Research at Yale initiative insists that it's time to "stop treating women as a subgroup of the human population" (because women are biologically and psychologically distinct from males), the magazine and its sources carefully follow the conventions of social constructivism. "Sex" is always paired with "gender" — as in, Yale's medical school needs to "include more instruction on sex and gender differences" — lest anyone think that sex is the same thing as gender and determinative of biological reactions.

An assistant professor at the medical school suggests asking students how the prognosis of a disease changes "if the patient identifies as a woman or a man." But if, as documented, females are not just a "subgroup of the human population," but physiologically and psychologically different, how a patient "identifies" should not change the prognosis. What matters is the patient's actual biological sex. (Perhaps the assistant professor simply means that a prognosis may change depending on whether the patient really is a woman or a man. Under that reading, the professor would be honoring constructivist gender conventions by substituting "identify" for the ruthlessly non-constructivist "is," while implicitly acknowledging the irrelevance of such gender conventions to medical diagnosis.)

Expect to see millions of taxpayer-derived research dollars directed toward the first reading — that someone's self-declared gender identity should be taken into account in diagnosing disease — even as the evidence piles up that males and females are not a political construction, but a biological one. Given that we are now up to over 100 different gender identities, the diagnostic complications will be enormous. Nevertheless, the march of academic identity politics through the institutions continues.

(Comment, below.)

Heather Mac Donald is the Thomas W. Smith Fellow at the Manhattan Institute, a contributing editor of City Journal, where this first apeared, and the author of the New York Times bestseller The War on Cops.

08/08/18: Why black-on-black violence will continue to terrorize Chicago
07/31/18: Let's demand the media -- and the education establishment -- stop concealing America's very real racial problem
07/23/18: A Tale of Two Killings
07/17/18: Kavanaugh Hysteria at Yale: Qualified Judge Named to Court!
07/09/18: In approving Trump's 'Travel Ban', High Court May Have Just Set a Bad Precedent
06/18/18: America the Horrible?
05/15/18: How Identity Politics Is Harming the Sciences
04/10/18: Who Misbehaves? Claims that school discipline is unfairly meted out ignore actual classroom behavior
04/03/18: Reject the Diversity Mandate
02/20/18: For libs, thousands of mostly black homicide victims are just a 'bump' in the numbers
02/08/18: #MediocrityToo: The coming mania for inclusion will erode standards of merit and excellence
02/06/18: Americans First
01/16/18: Policing Sexual Desire: The #MeToo movement's impossible premise
12/20/17: The media condemns President Trump for 'normalizing hatred' — while it looks the other way on Islamist violence and loathing by black-nationalists
11/14/17: Standing on the Shoulders of Diversocrats
11/06/17: The True Purpose of the University
06/06/17: The Left's Unilateral Suicide Pact
01/09/17: A Window Into a Depraved Culture
12/30/16: The holiday hooliganism traces back to the Obama administration's destructive efforts to undermine school discipline
10/11/16: The Left condemns the GOP candidate even as it celebrates crudity and sexual exhibitionism throughout the culture
09/28/16: Hillary's Debate Lies
07/25/16: The price of a black life: Give Trump his due
07/18/16: The Fire Spreads: Three cops dead in Baton Rouge, and the analogies to the 1960s deepen