Clicking on banner ads keeps JWR alive
Jewish World Review August 3, 2001 / 14 Menachem-Av, 5761

Debra J. Saunders

Debra J. Saunders
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Lose a kid, pass a law -- FIRST THE HUMAN tragedy, then the push for government to do something in response to it.

A baby dies in a parked car during a warm day because his father forgot his child was in the backseat. The public wants a prosecution and a new law. It doesn't seem to matter if the prosecution smacks of piling on or if the proposed new law is likely to punish parents who haven't jeopardized their children's safety.

The sad fact is: You can't pass a law against forgetfulness.

Last week, Brian Palmer Gilbert, 24, left his 5-month-old son Kyle in the family car for two hours as he watched an animated Japanese movie at his in- laws' house. He said he forgot his son was in the car. When he went to his car,

he found Kyle unconscious. The baby's core temperature had reached 107 degrees; he later died.

The Santa Clara District Attorney's office filed felony charges of involuntary manslaughter and child endangerment against Gilbert.

Usually, I've considered it heavy-handed when prosecutors file criminal charges against a parent who has just lost a child and the loss is not due to abusive or habitually neglectful parenting. As Gilbert's attorney, David Wise, noted, "He's going to be punishing himself for the rest of his life. I think it's unfortunate that the D.A.'s office feels the need to pile on top of that."

Deputy District Attorney Daniel T. Nishigaya, however, made a compelling argument for some court action. Kyle's life, he said, "has independent significance. He was not simply an extension of his parents. Although we respect and understand that his parents may be suffering, the personal feelings of the defendant or the victim's family cannot be the sole governing principle in a decision to pursue criminal charges."

True, a child is not chattel. But if Gilbert's story is essentially accurate, the county should quickly settle on probation, and spare Gilbert and his family both jail time and unnecessary anguish. Nothing the government could impose on Gilbert could match his own suffering.

On the legislative front, California state Sen. Jackie Speier, D-Hillsborough, is pushing a bill that would impose a $100 fine on parents who leave children under the age of 7 alone in a car.

A few problems: First, the bill isn't going to keep parents from leaving children in their cars if the children are in the car because a parent forgot them. If the parents remembered, they'd have taken their children.

Second, what happened to Kyle should be more alarming to parents than the prospect of a $100 fine.

Third, while safety advocates are right to tell parents to never leave a child in a car unattended, there are times when parents leave their children in a car for, say, a very quick run into a store, without harming their children. Why should those parents be fined because Brian Gilbert left his kid in a car?

Janette Fennell of the nonprofit San Francisco advocacy group Kids 'N Cars supports the Speier measure. She argued that, "the law itself becomes an education."

Good, then let officers write up warning slips for first offenses.

Fennell's best argument is that the ticketing system would give police a third option on top of their current two choices: taking kids away from their parents, or scolding parents and walking away.

Would a parent unmoved by a lecture from a cop be moved by a $100 ticket? I doubt it.

For additional information on Kids 'N Cars, see

Comment JWR contributor Debra J. Saunders's column by clicking here.


08/01/01: Welcome to France, killers
07/30/01: Why it's easy being green (in Europe)
07/26/01: If disabled means expendable
07/23/01: Condit should not resign
07/18/01: Feinstein should learn her limit
07/16/01: A drought of common sense
07/13/01: The catalog has no clothes
07/05/01: It's Bush against the planet
07/03/01: The man who would be guv
06/29/01: Wheeled, wired and free
06/27/01: O, fearful new world
06/25/01: End HMO horrors
06/21/01: Either they're dishonest or clueless
06/18/01: Freedom is a puff of smoke
06/15/01: In praise of going heavy: Yes, you can take it all
06/13/01: McVeigh: 'Unbowed' maybe, but dead for sure
06/11/01: Gumby strikes back
06/08/01: Los Angeles' last white mayor?
06/07/01: Kids will be kids, media will be media
06/04/01: Draw a line in the sand
05/30/01: Just don't call him a moderate
05/29/01: Operation: Beat up on civil rights
05/24/01: Of puppies, kittens and huge credit-card debts
05/22/01: Bush needs an energy tinkerbell
05/18/01: Divided we stand, united they fall
05/16/01: Big Bench backs might over right
05/15/01: Close SUV loophole
05/11/01: Kill the test, welcome failure
05/09/01: DA mayor's disappointing legacy
05/07/01: If it ain't broken ...
05/03/01: They shoot civilians, don't they?
04/30/01: Executions are not for prime time
04/12/01: White House and the green myth
04/10/01: The perjurer as celeb
04/04/01: Bush bashers don't know squat
04/02/01: Drugging our oldsters
03/30/01: Robert Lee Massie exercises his death wish
03/28/01: Cheney's nuclear reactor
03/26/01: Where California and Mexico meet
03/16/01: Boy's sentence was no accident
03/14/01: Soft money, hard reform
03/12/01: Banks, big credit lines and consumer bankruptcy
03/09/01: Free speech dies in Berkeley
03/02/01: When rats have rights
02/28/01: Move a frog, go to jail?
02/26/01: They knew they'd get away with it
02/20/01: How Dems define tax fairness
02/16/01: The jackpot casino Carmel tribe?
02/14/01: You can fight school success
02/12/01: Hannibal -- with guts this time
02/08/01: A family of jailbirds
02/05/01: Reality's most demeaning TV moments
02/01/01: Justice for the non-Rich
01/26/01: Hail to the chiefs of D.C. opinion
01/24/01: A day of mud and monuments
01/22/01: Diversity, division, de-lovely D.C.
01/19/01: Parties agree: Give back the money
01/17/01: Get tough with the oil companies, or forget pumping more Alaskan crude
01/15/01: Mineta better pray that no attending confirmation senator has ever driven to San Jose during rush hour
01/12/01: Europeans should look in the mirror
01/10/01: Dems' reasons for dissin' Dubya's picks
01/08/01: Jerry, curb your guru
01/03/01: A foe of Hitler and friend of Keating
12/28/00: Nice people think nice thoughts
12/26/00: The Clinton years: Epilogue
12/21/00: 'Tis the season to free nonviolent drug offenders 12/18/00: A golden opportunity is squandered
12/15/00: You can take the 24 years, good son
12/13/00: Court of law vs. court of public opinion
12/08/00: A salvo in the war on the war on drugs
12/06/00: Don't cry, Butterfly: Big trees make great decks
12/04/00: Florida: Don't do as Romans did
11/30/00: Special City's hotel parking ticket
11/27/00: No means yes, yes means more than yes
11/22/00: The bench, the ballot and fairness
11/20/00: Mendocino, how green is your ballot?

© 2000, Creators Syndicate