In this issue

Jonathan Tobin: Defending the Right to a Jewish State

Heather Hale: Compliment your kids without giving them big heads

Megan Shauri: 10 ways you are ruining your own happiness

Carolyn Bigda: 8 Best Dividend Stocks for 2015

Kiplinger's Personal Finance editors: 7 Things You Didn't Know About Paying Off Student Loans

Samantha Olson: The Crucial Mistake 55% Of Parents Are Making At Their Baby's Bedtime

Densie Well, Ph.D., R.D. Open your eyes to yellow vegetables

The Kosher Gourmet by Megan Gordon With its colorful cache of purples and oranges and reds, COLLARD GREEN SLAW is a marvelous mood booster --- not to mention just downright delish
April 18, 2014

Rabbi Yonason Goldson: Clarifying one of the greatest philosophical conundrums in theology

Caroline B. Glick: The disappearance of US will

Megan Wallgren: 10 things I've learned from my teenagers

Lizette Borreli: Green Tea Boosts Brain Power, May Help Treat Dementia

John Ericson: Trying hard to be 'positive' but never succeeding? Blame Your Brain

The Kosher Gourmet by Julie Rothman Almondy, flourless torta del re (Italian king's cake), has royal roots, is simple to make, . . . but devour it because it's simply delicious

April 14, 2014

Rabbi Dr Naftali Brawer: Passover frees us from the tyranny of time

Greg Crosby: Passing Over Religion

Eric Schulzke: First degree: How America really recovered from a murder epidemic

Georgia Lee: When love is not enough: Teaching your kids about the realities of adult relationships

Cameron Huddleston: Freebies for Your Lawn and Garden

Gordon Pape: How you can tell if your financial adviser is setting you up for potential ruin

Dana Dovey: Up to 500,000 people die each year from hepatitis C-related liver disease. New Treatment Has Over 90% Success Rate

Justin Caba: Eating Watermelon Can Help Control High Blood Pressure

The Kosher Gourmet by Joshua E. London and Lou Marmon Don't dare pass over these Pesach picks for Manischewitz!

April 11, 2014

Rabbi Hillel Goldberg: Silence is much more than golden

Caroline B. Glick: Forgetting freedom at Passover

Susan Swann: How to value a child for who he is, not just what he does

Cameron Huddleston: 7 Financial Tasks You Should Tackle Right Now

Sandra Block and Lisa Gerstner: How to Profit From Your Passion

Susan Scutti: A Simple Blood Test Might Soon Diagnose Cancer

Chris Weller: Have A Slow Metabolism? Let Science Speed It Up For You

The Kosher Gourmet by Diane Rossen Worthington Whitefish Terrine: A French take on gefilte fish

April 9, 2014

Jonathan Tobin: Why Did Kerry Lie About Israeli Blame?

Samuel G. Freedman: A resolution 70 years later for a father's unsettling legacy of ashes from Dachau

Jessica Ivins: A resolution 70 years later for a father's unsettling legacy of ashes from Dachau

Kim Giles: Asking for help is not weakness

Kathy Kristof and Barbara Hoch Marcus: 7 Great Growth Israeli Stocks

Matthew Mientka: How Beans, Peas, And Chickpeas Cleanse Bad Cholesterol and Lowers Risk of Heart Disease

Sabrina Bachai: 5 At-Home Treatments For Headaches

The Kosher Gourmet by Daniel Neman Have yourself a matzo ball: The secrets bubby never told you and recipes she could have never imagined

April 8, 2014

Lori Nawyn: At Your Wit's End and Back: Finding Peace

Susan B. Garland and Rachel L. Sheedy: Strategies Married Couples Can Use to Boost Benefits

David Muhlbaum: Smart Tax Deductions Non-Itemizers Can Claim

Jill Weisenberger, M.S., R.D.N., C.D.E : Before You Lose Your Mental Edge

Dana Dovey: Coffee Drinkers Rejoice! Your Cup Of Joe Can Prevent Death From Liver Disease

Chris Weller: Electric 'Thinking Cap' Puts Your Brain Power Into High Gear

The Kosher Gourmet by Marlene Parrish A gift of hazelnuts keeps giving --- for a variety of nutty recipes: Entree, side, soup, dessert

April 4, 2014

Rabbi David Gutterman: The Word for Nothing Means Everything

Charles Krauthammer: Kerry's folly, Chapter 3

Amy Peterson: A life of love: How to build lasting relationships with your children

John Ericson: Older Women: Save Your Heart, Prevent Stroke Don't Drink Diet

John Ericson: Why 50 million Americans will still have spring allergies after taking meds

Cameron Huddleston: Best and Worst Buys of April 2014

Stacy Rapacon: Great Mutual Funds for Young Investors

Sarah Boesveld: Teacher keeps promise to mail thousands of former students letters written by their past selves

The Kosher Gourmet by Sharon Thompson Anyone can make a salad, you say. But can they make a great salad? (SECRETS, TESTED TECHNIQUES + 4 RECIPES, INCLUDING DRESSINGS)

April 2, 2014

Paul Greenberg: Death and joy in the spring

Dan Barry: Should South Carolina Jews be forced to maintain this chimney built by Germans serving the Nazis?

Mayra Bitsko: Save me! An alien took over my child's personality

Frank Clayton: Get happy: 20 scientifically proven happiness activities

Susan Scutti: It's Genetic! Obesity and the 'Carb Breakdown' Gene

Lecia Bushak: Why Hand Sanitizer May Actually Harm Your Health

Stacy Rapacon: Great Funds You Can Own for $500 or Less

Cameron Huddleston: 7 Ways to Save on Home Decor

The Kosher Gourmet by Steve Petusevsky Exploring ingredients as edible-stuffed containers (TWO RECIPES + TIPS & TECHINQUES)

Jewish World Review

Do women need mammograms?

By Harvard Health Letters

Before you get your next mammogram, learn the pros and cons of this controversial screening test. Although much research has found that mammograms do reduce the risk of dying from breast cancer over the long term, these tests can have false-positive results, which could lead to unnecessary tests or treatments | Once a year, thousands of women subject their breasts to the ritual ordeal of poking, prodding, and viselike squeezing known as a mammogram. They willingly endure this process because they know—or at least hope—that if they do get breast cancer, a mammogram will pick it up early enough to treat it and save their lives.

Although much research has found that mammograms do reduce the risk of dying from breast cancer over the long term, these screening tests can have false-positive results, which could lead to unnecessary tests or treatments. Considering the risks and benefits, is it worthwhile to have routine mammograms?

For women over 50, mammograms are worth having, says Barbara Smith, director of the Breast Program at Massachusetts General Hospital and associate professor of surgery at Harvard Medical School.

"The women who die of breast cancer are predominantly women who didn't have mammograms," she says. "If you're waiting until the tumor is big enough to feel by touch, your chance of dying is greater."

A couple of recent studies back up the value of having regular mammograms.

A Swedish study published in the journal Radiology in 2011 was the longest ever trial of mammograms for breast cancer detection. It was also the first to track the effects of this screening method alone on breast cancer mortality.


Every weekday publishes what many in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". In addition to INSPIRING stories, HUNDREDS of columnists and cartoonists regularly appear. Sign up for the daily update. It's free. Just click here.

After following more than 133,000 women, ages 40 to 74, over a period of nearly 30 years, the researchers found that women who had a mammogram were 30 percent less likely to die from breast cancer compared to women who didn't have mammograms. For every 414 women screened with a mammogram over a 7-year period, one breast cancer death was prevented.

The authors say most of the deaths prevented were over the long term—after the first 10 years of follow-up. Following women for three decades allowed the researchers to study the effects of mammogram diagnosis on slower-growing breast cancers.

Another positive study, this one from the Netherlands, matched 755 women who had died from breast cancer with more than 3,700 control women. All of the women were age 49 or older when they were diagnosed or screened. The results, which were published in the journal Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, suggested that mammograms might lower the odds of dying from breast cancer by about half.

Both of these studies credited mammograms with cutting the risk of dying from breast cancer. Yet other research has raised a few red flags about this test.

A 2010 Norwegian study, which was led by researchers at the Harvard School of Public Health, also found a lifesaving benefit from mammograms—although it wasn't as significant. The researchers looked at data from about 40,000 women who took part in the Norwegian breast cancer screening program.

The study found that mammogram screening only reduced the rate of breast cancer death by about 10 percent in women ages 50 to 69. The reduction was less—8 percent—in women over age 70. Yet a follow-up to the study released this April noted that six to 10 out of every 2,500 women screened were "overdiagnosed," meaning tumors were found and treated that were never likely to become life threatening.

A 2011 analysis of seven mammogram studies found a 15 percent reduction in deaths among women who had the screening test compared to those who didn't, but women who had mammograms were also 30 percent more likely to undergo unnecessary tests or treatments due to false-positive results. Overall, the study found that mammogram screening only extended the life of one out of every 2,000 women, while it led to unnecessary tests and treatments in 10 of those women.

Yet Dr. Smith says false-positive results are a risk with any medical test that's designed to find disease early.

"If you wait until the tumor is huge and obvious, you won't get a false positive, but you'll have waited so long the cancer will have spread," she commented. Because surgeons are moving away from open biopsies in favor of less invasive procedures such as core needle biopsies, even if you need to have further tests, the risks involved are lower, Dr. Smith says.

When discussing with your doctor whether and how often to have mammograms, take into account your breast cancer risks, which include:

1. Your age. Most aggressive breast cancers are found in women 55 or older.

2. Your genes. Up to 10 percent of breast cancers are inherited, most commonly from mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.

3. Your family history. Having a mother, sister, or daughter with breast cancer increases your risk.

4. Your cancer history. If you've had cancer in one breast, you're three to four times more likely to develop it again in the same or the other breast.

5. Your breast density. Women with denser breasts are more likely to get breast cancer, and their cancer may be harder to spot on a mammogram.

6. Your use of hormone therapy. Taking combined hormone therapy after menopause increases breast cancer risk.

Though they can pick up early breast cancers, mammograms aren't guaranteed to save your life. Screening can miss up to 20 percent of tumors, especially if you have very dense breasts. Or they can detect a cancer that isn't there, potentially sending you for an ultrasound or biopsy when you don't need it. And finally, mammograms expose you to small amounts of radiation (although the risk of getting cancer from a mammogram is negligible).

You, like many women, may be willing to accept these risks in exchange for the chance that the test will pick up breast cancer early, when it's more treatable and before it has a chance to spread. Leading health organizations agree.

Here are their recommendations based on the available evidence:

The National Cancer Institute advises all women age 40 and over to have a mammogram every one to two years.

The American Cancer Society recommends yearly mammograms starting at age 40 and continuing for as long as a woman is in good health.

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends mammograms every other year for women ages 50 to 74, but says there's not enough evidence to recommend regular mammogram screenings in women ages 75 and older.

Because the frequency and age ranges for testing vary by organization, it can be hard to know which recommendation to follow. Dr. Smith goes by the American Cancer Society guidelines, advising all of her female patients age 40 and older to have annual mammograms.

Should you stop having mammograms after age 75, as the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends?

"If anything, the risk of breast cancer goes up every year a woman is alive," Dr. Smith says. "To say that you stop checking at 75, when the average life expectancy of a woman in this country is in the mid-80s, doesn't make sense to me." As long as you're healthy enough to tolerate a lumpectomy under local anesthesia—should you need it—Dr. Smith recommends that you continue to get annual mammograms in your 70s and beyond.

Although there has been a great deal of debate surrounding mammograms, ultimately the goal of having this screening test is to find tumors early.

"Breast cancer is a very common cancer. The treatments are easier if the tumors are smaller," Dr. Smith says.

Mammography techniques are improving, too. Newer scans in development, such as molecular breast imaging and tomosynthesis (which creates a three-dimensional image of the breast) may soon improve the accuracy of breast cancer diagnosis and reduce the risk of false-positive results. - Harvard Women's Health Watch

Interested in a private Judaic studies instructor — for free? Let us know by clicking here.

Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

To comment, please click here.