Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review April 1, 2003 / 28 Adar II, 5763

Laura Ingraham

Laura Ingraham
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Peter Arnett's MOAB | About five years ago I crossed paths, sort of, with famed journalist Peter Arnett. A few friends and I stopped to have an after-dinner drink at an almost-empty bar on Manhattan's East Side. He was alone and clearly wanted to be noticed. We ignored him.

Today Arnett is getting the attention he deserves--just not the kind he wanted.

That Peter Arnett would give a kissy-kissy interview with Iraq Television is no big surprise to most conservatives. Neither is the specific fact that he would describe the war plan as a "failure" to the enemy of the US. Arnett, like the majority of his peers, never wanted our country to go to war, never believed in the cause, never trusted President Bush's intentions. These beliefs colored his reporting, affected the tone of his coverage, and finally bubbled over into the biggest boo-boo of his life. It was one thing for a Hollywood dope like Sean Penn to be used as an Iraqi propaganda tool--but a journalist "reporting" for an American news outlet?

All last week in the White House and Pentagon briefing rooms, beat reporters for the major news organizations were saying similar things as Arnett. We started hearing the Q-word (quagmire) and the phrase "bogged down" in the earliest days of Gulf War II. ABC's Terry Moran badgered Ari Fleischer about why the Administration couldn't just admit it made a mistake in the war planning. On Day Seven of the war, CBS's Leslie Stahl raised Arnett-like battle strategy concerns that "this force isn't massive enough," that "the rear is exposed" (to Fedayeen forces).

Media bias is just a fact of life. We deal with it. We take note of it and find alternative sources of information. Internet news and commentary sites thrive--with entrepreneurs like Matt Drudge (The Drudge Report) and Brent Bozell (Media Research Center) serving as crucial watchdogs on the media, Hollywood, and political elites. Talk radio is more popular than ever--much to the dismay of liberals who predicted its downturn when there wasn't any Bill Clinton to kick around anymore. And Fox News continues to trounce the competition.

Eric Alterman, a writer for The Nation and an old MSNBC colleague, is busy peddling his new book "What Liberal Bias?" In it, he contends that liberal bias is a myth. While it existed back in Eisenhower's day, it essentially ended in 1981 when Reagan was elected. Recently he was a guest on my radio show and--when he wasn't condescendingly referring to me as "Hon" or "Sweetie"--he strenuously insisted that the major media outlets were scrupulously objective. If anything, he claimed, that today's media tilts conservative because conservative voices are loudest.

As someone who has appeared on television opposite the stentorian Alterman, his colleague Katrina vanden Heuvel, Newsweek's Eleanor Clift, and filmmaker Michael Moore, I must say I find his "loud" charge hilarious. Plus, these media outlets that have supposedly been cowed by conservatives have fawned over Alterman's book--most recently The New York Times.

"Give me examples of bias!" Alterman demanded. I directed him to any White House press briefing, virtually any Peter Jennings broadcast, and the editorial boards of most metropolitan newspapers. To the Arnett fiasco, Alterman would undoubtedly point to NBC's quick dismissal of the "veteran reporter" as further evidence that the media has "rolled over for conservatives." In fact, NBC's first impulse on Sunday was to defend Arnett, saying he had given the interview as a "professional courtesy" and that his "remarks were analytical in nature." If public outcry hadn't been so overwhelming, NBC would have been content to keep Arnett as its eyes and ears in Baghdad.

Only in the warped world of biased television "journalism" do people continue to come back from the grave, like Freddy Krueger. In 1998, CNN reprimanded Arnett and did not renew his contract after he filed a bogus report charging American forces with using sarin nerve gas on a Laotian village in 1970 to kill U.S. defectors. But this didn't matter to NBC or Arnett's main employer National Geographic. Both jumped at the chance to showcase the Pulitizer-prize winner.

Aggressive, probing, investigative reporting is healthy for any democracy--even in times of war. We need more of that and less of the "gotcha" questioning that has become the tedious staple of the press briefings here and at Cent Com headquarters in Qatar. The Arnett interview is just one of the more egregious and nauseating examples of a press corps dominated by people who are fundamentally at odds with the way average, hard-working American thinks.

Arnett's apology referred to his "misjudgment" in deciding to sit down with Enemy TV. The families of our servicemen who are dead, missing, and on active duty would probably describe Arnett's actions in a different way--it starts with a "T" and ends with an "N." Treason.

Every weekday publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor Laura Ingraham is the host of a radio show syndicated nationally by Westwood One Radio Network and the author of "The Hillary Trap: Looking for Power in All the Wrong Places". Comment by clicking here.

03/25/03: The Dems' Michael Moore Problem
03/18/03: Dixie Chicken out
03/11/03: The real predator drones
03/04/03: The French PR machine crashes
02/25/03: Keep us safe --- let's be more like Europe!
02/11/03: Hollywood loves dictators
02/05/03: First Amendment frauds in Cincinnati
01/28/03: The elites versus the voters
01/22/03: Playing (and losing) Homeland Security politics
01/14/03: What have you done for the free world lately?
12/17/02: Who is the better leader: Gore or Lott?
12/10/02: Who, more than anyone else, is actively advancing the cause of civil liberties around the world?
12/04/02: 'Tis the season to hope for the worst
11/27/02: The Federal P.C. Police Versus Small Business Owners (Cont'd)
11/19/02: Bipartisan moves to reward illegals
11/13/02: Eminem, a rebel? You gotta be kidding!
11/05/02: In defense of low turnout
10/30/02: Hell, no they won't go!
10/22/02: Where are the moderate Muslims?
10/15/02: California dreaming, cont'd
10/08/02: Slick Willie's running
10/01/02: Euro-worries about wall flower status
09/26/02: How lucky we are that the Straight Talk Express drove off the cliff!
09/18/02: What Jackson and Sharpton know about conservatives
09/12/02: The Today Show v. guns
08/27/02: Bush not attending the UN-sponsored "bash Amerika" conference!?
08/20/02: The NEA: Let the anti-American indoctrination begin!
08/13/02: Bubba's revenge
08/07/02: Bilingual bust continues its drag on our schools
07/30/02: Dems love for big lawyers=big opportunity
07/23/02: No time for vacation
07/16/02: Is Homeland Security all wet?
06/25/02: The firing season has arrived
06/18/02: Picking the next chief
06/11/02: Intelligence coup, with much more to do
06/07/02: The Bush administration's foul ball
05/30/02: Post-feminism in the aftermath of 9-11
05/23/02: The press gunning for Ashcroft
05/19/02: El Jefe basks in Carter's Light
05/15/02: Former presidents who don't understand the word "former"
05/07/02: Ozzy deified, many mortified, drugs glorified?
05/01/02: Bush: "California here I come ... sort of"
04/27/02: The good news about conservatives versus Bush
04/17/02: While the cat's away....
04/09/02: Preview of 2004: See how Dick runs!
01/29/02: A kinder, gentler human-rights violator?
11/27/01: Military tribunals provide streamlined justice
09/07/01: Scariest animal wears pants
08/17/01: Depressed after seeing uncut version of Apocalypse Now --- and for good reason
07/20/01: The other, maybe more important, news
06/22/01: Washington's pro-Bono worship is unnerving
06/01/01: Burying conservatism
05/17/01: Ashcroft's abuse of power

© 2002, Laura Ingraham