Clicking on banner ads keeps JWR alive
Jewish World Review June 7, 2001 / 17 Sivan, 5761

Debra J. Saunders

Debra J. Saunders
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Kids will be kids, media will be media -- NO wonder the public hates the media. Of course, it's a story when the 19-year-old twin daughters of the president are caught trying to procure margaritas and then charged with breaking Texas' alcohol laws. It's just too bad we can't report the facts without manufacturing all sorts of "bigger picture" angles that only make us look cheesy.

First, there's the "how the media are covering the story" angle. It's as if a newspaper were saying: Other papers ran the story first. (In the era when reporters didn't have to apologize for getting a good story, this was known as a "scoop.")

There's a variation for TV-talk shows: "Should the media cover the story?"

Then, because most of us in the media broke alcohol laws as minors, we have to explain how the twins' drinking is different. (Duh, our dads weren't the president.)

So, there's the "but I was never arrested" angle. There's the "not once but twice" angle. This comes from journalists who are shocked that, having been cited for being a minor in possession of alcohol on April 27, Jenna Bush nonetheless tried to buy a drink in a restaurant with someone else's I.D. in May. It makes them -- reluctantly, they insist -- question her judgment.

There's the "she should know a president's daughter can't do that" angle. I agree, but there is another side to that angle: She should know that partisan Democrats will stoop to humiliating a teen-ager to embarrass her Republican father. As the Houston Chronicle reported, a local official admitted this may be the first time a restaurant has considered underage drinking worthy of a 911 call. Then Chuy's restaurant called the Austin American-Statesman. Go to, watch the five flashing margaritas, and contemplate that.

There's the "Bush signed the Texas three-strikes-teen-drinking law" angle. (As if there would be no story if he had not signed that law.) As well as the "she had better not get special treatment" angle. (No worry there; Jenna and Barbara Bush are getting special treatment -- the specially harsh kind.)

There's the "Jenna's drinking problem" angle. "She appears to have a problem," the Nation's Katrina vanden Heuvel pronounced on CNBC's "Hardball." Which segues to the "Daddy made Jenna an alcoholic" angle. As in Fiona Morgan's piece for "And her father's admitted problems with alcohol have fueled speculation that Jenna might have inherited alcoholism."

Both fall under the "bad parenting" angle. The twins' "recklessness in the first months of their father's presidency," Salon's Joan Walsh writes, "suggests their parents screwed up by downplaying and even denying President Bush's own drinking problem."

Last year, police found British Prime Minister Tony Blair's then 16-year-old son Euan "drunk and incapable" in London's Leicester Square. Does this make Blair a bad father? And don't even mention the Kennedy kids.

Of course, President and Laura Bush need to talk with the girls. Say that they're old enough to vote or buy a shotgun, that even before they turned 18 they were old enough to get an abortion, but that the laws Bush readily swore to uphold make it unlawful for them to buy a beer. Explain that the long knives are out and they had better shape up, or expect the worst from all us high-minded hand-wringing journalists.

Comment JWR contributor Debra J. Saunders's column by clicking here.


06/04/01: Draw a line in the sand
05/30/01: Just don't call him a moderate
05/29/01: Operation: Beat up on civil rights
05/24/01: Of puppies, kittens and huge credit-card debts
05/22/01: Bush needs an energy tinkerbell
05/18/01: Divided we stand, united they fall
05/16/01: Big Bench backs might over right
05/15/01: Close SUV loophole
05/11/01: Kill the test, welcome failure
05/09/01: DA mayor's disappointing legacy
05/07/01: If it ain't broken ...
05/03/01: They shoot civilians, don't they?
04/30/01: Executions are not for prime time
04/12/01: White House and the green myth
04/10/01: The perjurer as celeb
04/04/01: Bush bashers don't know squat
04/02/01: Drugging our oldsters
03/30/01: Robert Lee Massie exercises his death wish
03/28/01: Cheney's nuclear reactor
03/26/01: Where California and Mexico meet
03/16/01: Boy's sentence was no accident
03/14/01: Soft money, hard reform
03/12/01: Banks, big credit lines and consumer bankruptcy
03/09/01: Free speech dies in Berkeley
03/02/01: When rats have rights
02/28/01: Move a frog, go to jail?
02/26/01: They knew they'd get away with it
02/20/01: How Dems define tax fairness
02/16/01: The jackpot casino Carmel tribe?
02/14/01: You can fight school success
02/12/01: Hannibal -- with guts this time
02/08/01: A family of jailbirds
02/05/01: Reality's most demeaning TV moments
02/01/01: Justice for the non-Rich
01/26/01: Hail to the chiefs of D.C. opinion
01/24/01: A day of mud and monuments
01/22/01: Diversity, division, de-lovely D.C.
01/19/01: Parties agree: Give back the money
01/17/01: Get tough with the oil companies, or forget pumping more Alaskan crude
01/15/01: Mineta better pray that no attending confirmation senator has ever driven to San Jose during rush hour
01/12/01: Europeans should look in the mirror
01/10/01: Dems' reasons for dissin' Dubya's picks
01/08/01: Jerry, curb your guru
01/03/01: A foe of Hitler and friend of Keating
12/28/00: Nice people think nice thoughts
12/26/00: The Clinton years: Epilogue
12/21/00: 'Tis the season to free nonviolent drug offenders 12/18/00: A golden opportunity is squandered
12/15/00: You can take the 24 years, good son
12/13/00: Court of law vs. court of public opinion
12/08/00: A salvo in the war on the war on drugs
12/06/00: Don't cry, Butterfly: Big trees make great decks
12/04/00: Florida: Don't do as Romans did
11/30/00: Special City's hotel parking ticket
11/27/00: No means yes, yes means more than yes
11/22/00: The bench, the ballot and fairness
11/20/00: Mendocino, how green is your ballot?

© 2000, Creators Syndicate