Jewish World Review March 5, 2003 / 1 Adar II, 5763

Tony Blankley

JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Franc-tireur | Paul Johnson, the formerly left-wing but for the past generation renowned and brilliant British conservative journalist and historian, has put forward a particularly naughty proposal. Drawing on a thousand years of British distrust of the French, in this week's Mr. Johnson innocently poses the question: " ... whether France can be trusted as a nuclear power. The French have certainly sold nuclear technology to rogue states in the past, Iraq among them. In view of France's attempts to sabotage America's vigorous campaign to halt the spread of weapons of mass destruction, we need to be sure that France is not planning to cover the cost of its flagging nuclear weapons program by selling secrets to unruly states. Certainly Anglo-American surveillance of French activities in this murky area must be intensified."

Written in the puckish style of Edwardian short story writer Saki, it is hard to tell whether Mr. Johnson's observation was intended as needling humor or serious policy. It is a measure of how much things have changed in the last few months that I remain in doubt on that point. But in the context of the remainder of his article (which I recommend to you), it would seem that he is quite serious. And when one combines this perhaps whimsical suggestion with President Bush's decidedly unwhimsical speech last Wednesday night, we just might get a glimpse of things to come in this world gone mad that we are obliged for a while longer to call home (as soon as NASA can organize a colony on Mars, sign me up.)

In President Bush's underrated and understudied speech last Wednesday (See the Washington Times editorial "Wings Over the World," March 1, 2003), he warned that: " ... we are opposing the greatest danger in the war on terror ... outlaw regimes arming with weapons of mass destruction ... the passing of Saddam Hussein's regime will deprive terrorist networks of a wealthy patron ... And other regimes will be given a clear warning that support for terror will not be tolerated."

Given how serious and deliberate President Bush is on this supreme danger, that quoted passage must be read as putting Iran, Syria, Libya and North Korea on notice that what we are about to do to Saddam will be their fate, too, should they continue in defiance of civilized behavior. Mr. Johnson would seem to be adding France to that watch list. It's not as absurd as it sounds.

Of course, France is not a terrorist state -- merely a sometimes-annoying one. If they have transferred nuclear technology to Iraq in the past, it was surely only for commercial purposes. But then, North Korea sells its weapons to all buyers -- including rogue regimes -- because that is all they have to sell to finance their country. North Korea, a largely Buddhist country before it became communist, has no particularly sentimental attachments to jihadist Muslim terrorists; it's just business.

And France, a formerly Christian country before it became atheist, has never had overly sentimental attachments to the Muslims either (of course, now that its Muslim population is growing so fast, France well may be developing political attachments to them). But French atomic sales to Iraq, I'm sure, were just business also.

Nonetheless, the logic of President Bush's policy is cold and objective. The danger to the civilized world of weapons of mass destruction falling into terrorist hands is unconditional. Any nation that is an agency for such transfers is, objectively, a threat to the civilized world.

If France were to again transfer atomic technology to a still Saddamized Iraq, or a still radicalized Iran, or any other conduit to terrorists, the civilized world would have to take notice and attempt to block such transfers. And in her current effort to block President Bush from his mission of protection, she has become a force for measureless danger to the world.

It would be a pity if France had to be removed from the list of civilized countries. She was, after all, the first western civilized country to emerge after the fall of Rome and the long night of darkness that followed. For a half a millennium before the Renaissance, France was the single light of civilization in the western world. In many ways, she remains an exemplar of educated, civilized deportment. It is a bafflement to me that now, in this greatest crisis of western civilization, France could have so lost her way as to be the prime agent of hope for Saddam and the system of terrorism he underpins.

As a French general once observed: It's worse than a crime, it's a blunder.

Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

Tony Blankley is editorial page editor of The Washington Times. Comment by clicking here.

02/26/03: World history is shifting under our feet --- even our most experienced statesmen are, effectively, inexperienced
02/19/03: The shame! We've mischaracterized the French 02/12/03: Schroeder and Chirac will be disproportionately undercutting their interests
02/05/03: We need to rise above our temporary anger and seek to preserve our bonds with our European cousins
01/29/03: Who is President Bush's stupidest opponent: Saddam Hussein or Tom Daschle?
01/22/03: We call them our European cousins --- but I demand a DNA test
01/16/03: Dems bare partisan teeth
01/02/03: Before the cheering must come the struggle
12/27/02: Long ago and far away
12/18/02: Be glad that Gore's gone?
12/11/02: What fun! A titanic, once-in-a-century partisan battle royal is in the offing
12/04/02: Kerry atwitter
11/27/02: The unThankful list
11/20/02: First the scare, then the yawn
11/13/02: It's going to be a long two years for Lefty Pelosi and the Frisco Dems
11/06/02: Technology: A pollster's worst enemy --- thank goodness!
10/31/02: Watch this election's Wheel of Fate
10/23/02: The Ari and Colin Show: Politics has never been, well, more vaudeville-like
10/09/02: Bush beats drums of realism
10/02/02: Needed: A political chromatograph to detect any true statements in the public domain
09/25/02: Buchanan's new mag
09/18/02: There are many forms of peace
09/11/02: The imperial period of our history starts
09/04/02: Memo to Powell: In periods of upheaval, the refusal to act gives aid to those bent on destruction
08/30/02: Logging old growth is a sham issue

© 2002, Creators Syndicate