Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Feb. 3, 2004 / 11 Shevat, 5764

Bill Steigerwald

Bill Steigerwald
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Now, the election fun begins 10 minutes with Charlie Cook | Last time we talked with Charlie Cook, editor and publisher of "The Cook Political Report" (, it was January 2003, and six Democrats already were running for the right to take on George W. Bush this fall.

Cook, a regular guest on the TV news and chat shows, is recognized as one of the most astute and impartial analysts in politics. With South Carolina and six other primaries or caucuses in far-flung places such as Missouri, Arizona and Oklahoma bearing down on us, I talked to Cook by telephone on Thursday from his offices in Washington:

Q: Does John Edwards have enough to take South Carolina?

A: I think he has an inside track there. But this campaign has been so unpredictable, so volatile, I don't know why it should suddenly become predictable. Certainly, he would seem to have the inside track. There's plausibility there with Gen. (Wesley) Clark. And Sen. Kerry comes out of Iowa and New Hampshire with some momentum, so I don't think it's a done deal for (Sen. John) Edwards. Certainly if Edwards loses South Carolina, the rationale for his candidacy just evaporates.

Q: Is South Carolina really the most important of all these states? Basically that's all you hear on TV.

A: Having said for months that I thought South Carolina was the most important, in my mind I (now) think Missouri is probably the most important. First of all, it's the biggest. It's got the most delegates. If you think about it, Missouri is pretty much a microcosm of the country. Since 1900, the only time they've gone for the loser was 1956. So it's the biggest state and arguably the most representative of the country. I would say Missouri, Arizona and then South Carolina, conceding that this is different from what I had been saying.

Q: What does Kerry have to do in South Carolina and elsewhere to sustain his momentum?

A: What I'm looking for on Feb. 3 is, "Can John Kerry win two states of some size on that day — specifically Missouri and Arizona?" Those are the two biggest blocks of delegates up on that date. And secondly, if he wins those two, how many second places does he pull in?

I see Kerry as trying to replicate the (Michael) Dukakis "Super Tuesday" strategy, where you're going in to a group of states that aren't naturally very friendly, but you do have a lot of momentum. And you pick off a couple that you can win, and then you try to come in second everywhere else.

We're now transitioning into the period of the campaign that is really more about delegates than winning states. Iowa and New Hampshire are hugely important symbolically, but (there) really aren't many delegates.

Keep in mind that on the Democratic side, as opposed to the Republican, there are no winner-take-all primaries. It's proportional representation on a congressional district basis, and usually there's a bonus number of delegates for whoever wins the whole state. So a campaign can cherry-pick one or two or three congressional districts in the state and win or come in second in those districts and pick up a bunch of delegates, even though they are not winning or coming in second ....

Let's say Kerry wins Missouri and Arizona and comes in a few seconds, and somebody else wins here, somebody else wins there, but nobody else is consolidating their position to being the alternative to Kerry, then I think John Kerry is a long way towards cementing the nomination.

Q: Is Dean still a serious contender?

A: We don't know. There is not an obvious place for Dean to do really well — to win a state. There are probably some districts here or there he might be able to pick off, but Feb. 3 is not likely to be a very good day for Howard Dean. He's got some states further down the calendar, where if he can stay alive, if he can stay viable, he can win. But for the most part they are not on Feb. 3.

Donate to JWR

There's nothing wrong with the Dean campaign operation. ... With Dean, what went wrong was, No. 1, the spotlight on the war started dissipating. And even though casualties haven't really gone down, the news coverage of the war certainly has gone down precipitously. That took a lot of wind out of Howard Dean's sails.

Q: Do Gen. Clark or Edwards have a chance to pull of any surprises in those six other states on Tuesday or in Michigan or Washington the week after?

A: What I'd watch for is, can Edwards do South Carolina and Oklahoma? I don't have a feel for North Dakota or New Mexico. Can Clark win some place?

Q: Is this pretty much a two-way race between Kerry and Dean?

A: Not yet. If Kerry doesn't win any place next week, then I don't think he's the clear front-runner. And until John Edwards comes in first somewhere, I don't think you can say he's clearly in second place. Edwards has a few delegates, but not many. I think we're a week away from being able to make grand pronouncements about who's the odds-on favorite or who has emerged as the primary alternative.

Q: How is Bush doing in terms of job approval and the economy?

A: We don't have clear fix right now for where he is. Ultimately, if you're going to ask, "Is George Bush going to be re-elected or not?" I'd say, No. 1, look at Iraq. No. 2, look at the economy — and the economy defined not just as the stock market, not just GDP-growth rate.

I'd look at the unemployment rate, the number of jobs and the net job growth or loss since January of 2001. Finally, I'd look at the Democratic nominee. I think that's the third most-important factor. Then, at the end of the summer, we can throw in the running mate for good measure. ...

Looking at this election, I think the president is in worse shape now in Ohio than he was four years ago, and he just barely won it then. I look around the battle ground, and I think this election is still very much in play.

Q: Of all these guys now, who do you think would give President Bush the best run for his money?

A: Stipulating that as the third-most important factor, after Iraq and after the economy, it's hard to say. None of these guys is the complete package. With Kerry you've got a good resume, plenty of experience, a good campaign team, a decent message. He kind of looks presidential.

But the downside is, he is somewhat aloof. He doesn't connect well with people. And then, finally, he's a Massachusetts Democrat, and there's a presumption on the part of a lot of voters that a Massachusetts Democrat is a liberal. Until proven otherwise, they tend to think that.

You look at John Edwards. I think he is clearly the most talented campaigner out there. Some people have said that he is as good or a better natural campaigner than Bill Clinton. But his resume, experience and particularly his accomplishments are on the thin side. ...

I'm not sure Edwards could carry his home state of North Carolina.

Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor Bill Steigerwald is an associate editor and columnist at the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. Comment by clicking here.

01/30/04: Dem Dems
01/16/04: Caucuses bore you? You're not alone
01/14/04: Paradise lost? Ten minutes with Victor Davis Hanson
01/09/04: Howard Dean week?
12/26/03: How is the magazine sector doing?
12/17/03: 10 minutes with Thomas Sowell
12/15/03: Journalism 'watchdog' displays bad reporting
12/09/03: Book lovers are losing a good read
12/05/03: 'South Park' has unlikely audience tuning in
12/03/03: An odd lot of 35 'heroes'
11/24/03: 'We'll learn the truth someday' 10 minutes with JFK expert Cyril Wecht
11/18/03: Exposer of the idiocy of bureaucracy and the threat to individual freedom posed by government Ten minutes with author James Bovard
11/14/03: Two stories examine Wal-Mart's domination
11/07/03: The real Rumsfeld 10 minutes with author Midge Decter
11/05/03: Lights! Camera! Fudge!?
10/31/03: The straight dope on hate, drugs, Jon Stewart
10/24/03: See what federal $$$ does?
10/21/03: Esquire recalls its glory days
10/14/03: A 784-page biography hatchet job that only Clinton-haters will love — published by Random House? Ten minutes with Nigel Hamilton
10/10/03: Bush adviser girds for a tough fight ... 10 minutes with Mary Matalin
10/07/03: Forbes gives advice on making rich list
09/30/03: A 20th Century American tour
09/26/03: Reagan's life in letters
09/24/03: Bin Laden and Boy Bill
09/22/03: Dennis Miller makes funny business of politics
09/16/03: Famous 'bad girls' clear the air
09/12/03: Ben Stein gets serious: Davis is a 'thug in a gray flannel suit'
09/09/03: Smart(-Alecky) mag's very different 'swimsuit issue'; Murdoch might not be as bad as we thought
09/02/03: Ex-teacher lambastes our schools
08/25/03: Vanity Fair strives to be more than glamorous
07/22/03: Title IX's original intent Ten minutes with Eric Pearson
07/11/03: Vanity Fair dishes it out on JFK Jr., N.Y. Times
07/09/03: Why Ben Franklin should be the "Father of Our Country" ... 10 minutes with Walter Isaacson
07/07/03: Honoring nation's first celebrity superstar
06/27/03: Reader's Digest can't help but act its age
06/24/03: Dick Morris, consultant for hire, reveals the inside story
06/20/03: Move over, Hillary. Here comes a better work of fiction
06/10/03: Publications take us away from Middle East
06/03/03: Dear graduates: Work for freedom 10 minutes with Penn Jillette
05/30/03: National Geographic goes to the top of the world
05/23/03: Editors dabble in history, fiction
05/16/03: The Old Grim Lady gets covered
05/09/03: Political parties fighting over Iraq's wreckage
05/07/03: 10 minutes with a big-city Dem mayor who loathes budget deficits, the federal highway program, taxpayer-funded sports stadiums and the meddling (and aid money) of Washington
05/02/03: Are you sufficiently terrified?
04/29/03: Finally, a president defending American principles in the Middle East ... 10 minutes with Alexander Haig
04/25/03: Newsweeklies starting to lose interest in Iraq war
04/21/03: There's bias, and then there's bias
04/11/03: Planning future of Iraq, world
04/04/03: Newsweeklies come back with graphic look at war
03/28/03: Newsweeklies try to keep up with TV war coverage
03/26/03: Wen Ho Lee whistle-blower says beware of China
03/21/03: America's ready for war ... and peace
03/18/03: Baseball limping, not dead 10 minutes with author Andrew Zimbalist
03/14/03: Vanity Fair gets us ready for month's big event
03/11/03: A road map for Iraq's liberation devised by James Madison? 10 minutes with James S. Robbins
03/06/03: Iraq war will come and go before we know it
02/28/03: America takes time out for swimsuits
02/26/03: 'We shall be seen as liberators' .... 10 minutes with noted Brit commentator David Pryce-Jones
02/21/03: Terrorism one of many losing battles
02/14/03: Editors planning for the day after Gulf War II
02/12/03: The 'religiosity' of Ronald Reagan 10 minutes with author Paul Kengor
02/10/03: Should the shuttle crash be the end of NASA?
02/06/03: Dear Joan ...
01/31/03: Newsweek, Nation ponder pros, cons of Gulf War II
01/24/03: 'Original' ideas follow New Deal philosophy
01/22/03: When handicapping 2004, watch the economy: Ten minutes with Charlie Cook
01/17/03: New Republic fans hatred for SUVs
01/14/03: 10 minutes with Santorum on ... taxes, steel and Lott
01/10/03: Newsweeklies move on to latest menace
01/07/03: The best of the Q&As
12/30/02: Rosie's demise tops list of 2002 highlights
12/23/02: GOP must stick to its principles: 10 questions for ... Bill Kristol
12/20/02: Lott fiasco uncovers bigger problem
12/18/02: Free markets king in Sweden, at least for a day: Ten minutes with . Donald Boudreaux
12/13/02: Corruption of Indian casinos no surprise
12/06/02: Giving credit to young philanthropists
12/02/02: Ten minutes with . Chris Matthews
11/26/02: It's critical to memorialize communism's victims: 10 minutes with Lee Edwards
11/22/02: JFK's secret health woes are revealed
11/19/02: “It's best to contain Saddam”: Ten minutes with Col. David Hackworth
11/15/02: Brushing up on the affairs of a wild world
11/12/02: Make Dems filibuster 10 minutes with Robert L. Bartley
11/08/02: National Geographic: Urban overpopulation is good
11/05/02: The bloody consequences of a broken INS: Ten minutes with Michelle Malkin
11/01/02: Going to pot; thank heaven for media overkill
10/29/02: It's all about federalism: Ten minutes with Jonah Goldberg
10/25/02: Frank Sinatra, Kurt Cobain, Mad Magazine will never die
10/22/02: Here's why Orwell matters: Ten minutes with Christopher Hitchens
10/18/02: The sniper knocks Iraq off the covers
10/15/02: Iraq, oil and war: 10 minutes with ... economist/historian Daniel Yergin
10/11/02: England's gun-control experiment has backfired
10/04/02: Buchanan the media baron?
09/27/02: Analyzing Esquire, GQ is not for the squeamish
09/20/02: CEOs: The rise and fall of American heroes
09/13/02: Skeptics remind U.S. to calm down
09/10/02: 'A failure to recognize a failure': 15 minutes with ... Bill Gertz
09/06/02: Rating the 9-11 mags
08/30/02: Bad trains, bad planes, and bad automobiles
08/28/02: Baseball, broken, can be fixed: 15 minutes with George Will
08/16/02: 9-11 overload has already begun
08/13/02: Tell us what you really think, Ann Coulter
08/09/02: A funny take on a new kind of suburb
08/02/02: It's not the humidity, it's the (media) heat wave; the death of American cities
07/12/02: Colombia's drug lords are all business
07/09/02: If capitalism is 'soulless' then show me something better: 10 minutes with Alan Reynolds
06/25/02: Origins of a scandal: 10 minutes with Michael Rose
06/21/02: 9/11 report unearths good, bad and ugly
06/18/02: The FBI is rebounding 10 Minutes with Ronald Kessler
06/14/02: U.S. News opens closet of Secret Service
06/11/02: 10 minutes with William Lind: Can America survive in this 'fourth-generation' world?
06/07/02: America, warts and all
05/30/02: FBI saga gets more depressing
05/13/02: The magazine industry's annual exercise in self-puffery
04/30/02: 10 Minutes with ... The New York Sun's Seth Lipsky
04/26/02: Will the American Taliban go free?
04/23/02: 10 minutes with ... Dinesh D'Souza
04/19/02: Saddam starting to show his age
04/12/02: Newsweek puts suicide bombing in perspective
04/09/02: How polls distort the news, change the outcome of elections and encourage legislation that undermines the foundations of the republic
04/05/02: Looking into the state of American greatness
03/25/02: The American President and the Peruvian Shoeshine Boys
03/22/02: Troublemaking intellectual puts Churchill in spotlight
03/20/02: 10 minutes with ... Bill Bennett
03/18/02: Suddenly, it's cool again to be a man
03/12/02: 10 minutes with Ken Adelman
03/08/02: TIME asks the nation a scary question
03/05/02: 10 minutes with ... Rich Lowry
02/26/02: 10 minutes with ... Tony Snow
02/12/02: Has Soldier of Fortune gone soft?

© 2002, Bill Steigerwald