
 |
|
February 13, 2012
Binyamin Rose: Back to the Bunker: How a life-risking act by a Christian family during the Holocaust saved a family and built a thriving community a world away
Menachem Wecker: Business Schools Teach Real Estate Despite Troubled Housing Market
February 10, 2012
Lisa M. Krieger: Man with defibrillator demands access to his own heart's information
David G. Savage: Why activists may not be in a hurry to have High Court rule on alternative marriage
February 9, 2012
Laura McMullen: 10 Least Expensive Public Schools for Out-of-State Students
Kimberly Palmer: How to actually enjoy -- relaxing, financially -- your vacation
February 8, 2012
Warren Richey: Why momentous Prop. 8 ruling might not satisfy gay-rights groups
Menachem Wecker: Though Controversial, LL.M.'s Can Lead to Specialized Legal Jobs
The Kosher Gourmet byDana Velden: Going to the bother of making soup? You know it better be good. This CREAM OF TOMATO SOUP certainly is! And it's a cinch to make, too (Includes techinques and serving secrets)
February 7, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.: Caught off-guard? President's Super Bowl interview with Matt Lauer gives those who need a reason not to vote for him, a darn good one
Suzanne Bohan: Leaping lizards! Tiny reptiles advancing robot design
February 6, 2012
Jonathan Tobin: Iran Threatens Israel With Destruction, But the New York Times Doesn't Hear It
Jeffrey Fleishman: In newly democratic Egypt, tens of democracy activists jailed, to stand trial; their groups are 'threatening the stability of the homeland'
Julie Deardorff : Researchers say antioxidants may not be that effective and could do more harm than good
Mark Clayton: How did Anonymous hackers eavesdrop on FBI and Scotland Yard?
February 3, 2012
Edmund Sanders : Israeli official says Iran is creating missile that could reach East Coast of US
Victoria Kim: Immigrant-smuggling ring used black drivers to avoid racial profiling
February 2, 2012
Jim Carney: Wrong number call may have saved her life
Reza Kahlili : Ex-CIA spy in Iran's Revolutionary Guard: What Obama doesn't grasp about striking deals with Tehran
Tina Susman: For woodchuck rescuer, every day is Groundhog Day
February 1, 2012
Brian Bennett: US officials see increasing threat of domestic attack from Iran
Emily Brandon: How to Take Advantage of New 401(k) Fee Disclosures
January 31, 2012
January 30, 2012
Paul Richter and Ramin Mostaghim: Misreading Teheran's limits -- deadly and economically devastating as they may be -- is a risk administration, Europe seem willing to take
Suzanne Bohan: Warning: Nap-deprived tots missing more than sleep, study finds
Meg Handley: Banks Revamping Rewards Programs to Woo Customers
January 27, 2012
Caroline B. Glick: Obama: Of course I intend to prevent a nuclear holocaust . . . in a few months
Yochonon Donn: In liberal New York City, fervently-Orthodox Jews may soon be getting a district to call their own
Jeannine Stein: An inflated ego and thinking you're 'all that' doesn't just make others sick of you, it can make you ill
Katy Hopkins: New budget rules may affect how much money you get for college
January 26, 2012
Ed Koch: To the New York Times, calling for the murder of Jews by those capable of having their incitement taken seriously isn't news
Jeannine Stein: Mental illness struck one in five U.S. adults in 2010: Report
January 25, 2012
Richard Simon: House passes two bills endorsing the use of religious symbols at military memorials
Fred Weir: Putin: Multiethnic Russia cannot survive as a US-style 'melting pot'; must find its own way
Susan Johnston: 5 Sneaky Coupon Strategies Consumers Should Watch Out For
January 24, 2012
Carol Clark: The price of your soul: How your brain decides whether to 'sell out'
Caroline B. Glick: America lost most in 'Arab Spring'. Sadly, many voters still don't grasp the extent
Warren Richey: Drug criminal scores win in GPS ruling from conservative-leaning high court
Erika Bolstad: Black conservatives gather to talk about gaining strength
January 23, 2012
Melissa Dribben: Jewish voters to play a key role in Florida's Republican primary
Jordan Rau: In quest to grow, Catholic hospital system will announce this morning its break from church
Ali Safi: U.S. envoy gives Taliban terms for peace talks
January 19, 2012
January 18, 2012
January 17, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney Jr.: No-kidding red lines: U.S. response to an Iranian nuke may be bluster, but Israel's won't be
David G. Savage: They sued their principals after slandering them online --- now the cases are headed to the Supreme Court
David Francis: Where to Invest in 2012: With stocks expected to rebound, opportunity abounds for investors
January 13, 2012
Ben Lynfield: Israeli lawmakers move to annex Jewish Judea, one museum at a time
Alexia Elejalde-Ruiz: Thriving through touch: Gentle massage helps older people with low mobility improve in mind and body
January 12, 2012
Warren Richey: Landmark Supreme Court ruling a 'resounding win' for religious groups
Warren Richey: Supreme Court says no to new rule on eyewitness testimony
John Fauber : Statins found to raise diabetes risk in postmenopausal women
Katy Hopkins : Consider This Before You Pay for an Online Degree
The Kosher Gourmet by Joseph Erdos: This mushroom and barley soup has an intense -- almost nutty -- flavor that mixes robust with Middle East. It has creaminess without cream
January 11, 2012
Shari Roan: Millions of atrial fibrillation sufferers at risk for devastating, but preventable, stroke
Tom Hussain: Pakistan -- recipient of more than $21 billion in civilian and military aid -- speeds pursuit of Iranian pipeline, defying US
David G. Savage: High court signals it won't be loosening TV's 'indecency' rules
Stephen Ceasar: Oklahoma's Islamic law amendment can't go into effect, court rules
January 10, 2012
Reza Kahlili: From an ex-CIA spy: US must exploit new split in Iran's Revolutionary Guard
Karen Kaplan: Study: Nicotine replacement products ineffective when used in real-life situations
January 9, 2012
Michael Doyle: Put through legal hell over dream home, couple fought back hard --- all the way to Supreme Court
|
| |
Jewish World Review
Dec. 14, 2005
/ 13 Kislev, 5766
Every way but militarily, the pullout from Iraq has begun
By
Jonathan Rauch
| 
|
|
|
|
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com |
On June 8, 1969, President Nixon announced the withdrawal of 25,000 American troops from Vietnam. Within the next few months,
he would announce more redeployments. "He was reluctant to withdraw," says John Mueller, a political scientist at Ohio State
University and the author of several books on war and public opinion, "but he kept being pushed by politics."
Nixon recognized that without U.S. military support, the government of South Vietnam would fall to the Communist insurgency, and
he believed that a fall would represent a humiliating and costly defeat. "But Nixon realized that his approval ratings would slip fast
unless he made progress in bringing the boys home," writes Stanley Karnow in Vietnam: A History. American officials searching for
a "breaking point" in Vietnam had found one, but what had broken was not the insurgency. It was U.S. public opinion: Americans no
longer believed the war was worth it.
President Bush may not know it yet or, then again, he may but in Iraq he is about to do a Nixon.
Psychologically and politically, the withdrawal phase has already begun. Militarily, the pullback will start within weeks or, at most,
months after the December 15 Iraqi parliamentary elections.
How can I be sure? I'm not, and I have no inside information. But the evolving structure of public opinion about Iraq has made the
current war effort there unsustainable.
The public has been souring on the Iraq effort for months, and lately the numbers have taken a turn for the worse. In November, a
majority (54 percent to 45 percent) told the Gallup Organization that the war in Iraq was a mistake, and the public leaned, albeit
narrowly (50 percent to 46 percent), toward thinking that the United States will not win.
More ominous for the Bush administration were responses to a question regularly asked by Rasmussen Reports, a nonpartisan
polling organization: "Which is more important, getting American troops home as soon as possible or making sure that Iraq
becomes a peaceful nation enjoying freedom and democracy?" In October, the proportion who preferred coming home crossed the
50 percent barrier, and decisively: by 53 percent to 38 percent.
There are at least two ways to read those numbers. David Winston, the president of the Winston Group, a Republican polling and
strategy organization, argues that the public still supports the mission in Iraq but that the administration needs to do a better job of
explaining what it has accomplished and how it plans to succeed. If Winston is correct, then this month's Iraqi parliamentary
elections, combined with Bush's framing of those elections in his State of the Union speech next month, may prove decisive. "I think
we've hit a very critical point," Winston says. Bush seems to agree: This week, he unveiled a "National Strategy for Victory in Iraq"
and delivered the first in a series of high-profile speeches assuring the public that "our strategy in Iraq is clear."
The other way to read the numbers is to see public opinion as having already passed the point of no return. Public support for the
Iraq effort, Mueller writes in the November/December issue of Foreign Affairs, has declined more precipitously than did support for
either the Korean or the Vietnam War, "and if history is any indication, there is little the Bush administration can do to reverse this
decline." Support for the Vietnam War never recovered once a majority came to believe in 1968 that the war was a mistake.
According to Gallup, a higher percentage of Americans want an Iraq withdrawal today than wanted a Vietnam withdrawal in the
summer of 1970.
Iraq, however, is not Vietnam, so perhaps history is not a good gauge. For a firmer indication, look at the structure of public opinion
on Iraq.
Last month, the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press asked a revealing series of questions about Iraq. Pew's
respondents were more optimistic about eventual success in Iraq than were Gallup's, with 56 percent saying that efforts to establish
a stable democracy will succeed. Still, only by the most slender of margins (48 percent to 45 percent) did Pew's respondents say
that taking military action in Iraq was the right decision.
Now, that seems odd. If the public thinks success is still likely, why is support for the policy so weak? Because the public no
longer views success defined as building a stable democracy in Iraq as worth the effort.
The United States went to war to get rid of Saddam Hussein and remove weapons of mass destruction from Iraq. Well, Saddam is
gone and Iraq is WMD-free. So why are U.S. forces still fighting?
Bush says the U.S. presence in Iraq is essential to fighting terrorism. That was a strong argument for a while, but the public no
longer buys it. In the Pew survey, respondents were just as likely to say that the American effort in Iraq is hurting the war on
terrorism as they were to say that it's helping. Moreover, two-thirds of the public believes that the ability of terrorists to launch a
major attack on the United States has not diminished since September 11. As for Vice President Cheney's insistence that the war
in Iraq is necessary to fight the terrorists who have set up shop as a result of the war well, let's just say it seems unlikely to
change many minds.
Bush also says the Iraq effort will help democratize and stabilize the whole Middle East. The public is not buying that, either. Pew
finds only a third of the public saying that democratizing the Middle East is a good idea that will probably succeed. Most people (58
percent) believe either that democratizing the region won't succeed (36 percent) or that it is a bad idea altogether (22 percent).
Finally, the public is worried about the decline in America's image overseas, and it blames the Iraq war for much of the decline.
Two-thirds of the public told Pew that America is less respected now than in the past, and 43 percent of the public (not just of the
two-thirds) calls this a "major problem." And what caused America's decline in the world's eyes? A heavy majority, including almost
two-thirds of Republicans, points to Iraq.
What emerges here is not fleeting disenchantment, but a coherent and hard-nosed critique of Bush's strategy. The administration's
fundamental problem is not that the public is discouraged by U.S. casualties, or that news from Iraq has been bad, or that the
president needs to give better speeches. The problem is that the public sees no stakes in Iraq sufficient to justify the military effort
and diplomatic cost.
If Pew's findings are accurate, then presidential rhetoric and developments in Iraq have mostly ceased to matter. The public will not
support a military operation that it has come to regard as social work on the behalf of Iraqis, rather than security work on the behalf
of Americans.
"I think we've reached a point where news from Iraq itself is not likely to reverse the trajectory," says Scott Rasmussen, the
president of Rasmussen Reports. By contrast, "troops coming home is a new dynamic. And that is what will change poll numbers."
Indeed, a combination of returning U.S. forces and lower oil prices come November, Rasmussen says, would be "Democrats'
nightmare."
And so, any day now, the president's political advisers will go to him and say something like this:
"Mr. President, if U.S. forces are not clearly on their way out of Iraq by about June 30, we will face a bloodbath in the midterm
elections, and the Republicans will lose the House or the Senate or both. On the other hand, if U.S. forces are coming home, you
will have cut the legs out from under the Democrats. They will have no choice but to support your drawdown or call for an even faster
one. Either way, they would be in no position to blame you for any subsequent setbacks over there. Right now, you have nothing to
say on Iraq that makes sense to the public. Once the troops start coming home, it will be the other side that has nothing to say."
Which will Bush choose? If political reality alone does not sway him, he will reflect that maintaining a massive Iraq deployment in
the face of public hostility is unsustainable and ultimately counterproductive, setting up conditions for a Vietnam-style collapse and
a backlash against Bush's democracy agenda.
So by spring, if not earlier, Bush will announce that progress in Iraq allows U.S. forces to start coming home. He will say that an
American drawdown is the best way to help the Iraqis stand on their own. He will argue, much as he did with his tax cuts, that
whatever pace he sets is precisely the right pace, and that withdrawing any faster or slower would be the height of irresponsibility.
He may also say that withdrawing is "not a formula for getting out of [the region], but one that provided the only sound basis for
America's staying in and continuing to play a responsible role."
Those were the words of Richard Nixon, who, somewhere, is wanly smiling.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Jonathan Rauch is a senior writer and columnist for National Journal. Comment by clicking here.
Jonathan Rauch Archives
© 2005, Jonathan Rauch
|
|

Arnold Ahlert
Mitch Albom
Jay Ambrose
Michael Barone
Barrywood
Tony Blankley
Lori Borgman
Stratfor Briefing
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Richard Z. Chesnoff
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Alan Douglas
Larry Elder
Suzanne Fields
Frank J. Gaffney
Bernie Goldberg
Jonah Goldberg
Julia Gorin
Jonathan Gurwitz
Paul Greenberg
Argus Hamilton
Victor Davis Hanson
Betsy Hart
Ron Hart
Nat Hentoff
Marybeth Hicks
David Horowitz
Jeff Jacoby
Renee James
Paul Johnson
Jack Kelly
Ed Koch
Ch. Krauthammer
Michael Ledeen
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Kathryn Lopez
Rich Lowry
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Ann McFeatters
Dale McFeatters
Dana Milbank
Jeanne Moos
Dick Morris
Jim Mullen
Deroy Murdock
Judge A. Napolitano
Bill O'Reilly
Kathleen Parker
Star Parker
Dennis Prager
Wesley Pruden
Tom Purcell
Sharon Randall
Robert Robb
Cokie & Steve Roberts
Heather Robinson
Pat Sajak
Debra J. Saunders
Martin Schram
Culture Shlock
David Shribman
Roger Simon
Michael Smerconish
Thomas Sowell
Ben Stein
Mark Steyn
John Stossel
Cal Thomas
Dan Thomasson
Bob Tyrrell
Ben Wattenberg
Diana West
Dave Weinbaum
George Will
Walter Williams
Byron York
ZeitGeist
Mort Zuckerman

Robert Arial
Chuck Asay
Baloo
Chip Bok
Dry Bones
Lisa Benson
John Branch
John Cole
J. D. Crowe
John Deering
Brian Duffy
Everything's Relative
Mallard Fillmore
Glenn Foden
Jake Fuller
Bob Gorrel
Joe Heller
David Hitch
Jerry Holbert
Lee Judge
Steve Kelley
Jeff Koterba
Dick Locher
Jimmy Margulies
Rick McKee
Michael Ramirez
Kevin Siers
Jeff Stahler
Ed Stein
Danna Summers
John Trever
Gary Varvel
Kirk Walters

Mr. Know-It-All
Dr. Peter Gott
GET A JOB! by Marty Nemko
Richard Lederer
Frugal Living
Tech Maven
On Nutrition
Bookmark These
Bruce Williams
|