
 |
|
February 13, 2012
Binyamin Rose: Back to the Bunker: How a life-risking act by a Christian family during the Holocaust saved a family and built a thriving community a world away
Menachem Wecker: Business Schools Teach Real Estate Despite Troubled Housing Market
February 10, 2012
Lisa M. Krieger: Man with defibrillator demands access to his own heart's information
David G. Savage: Why activists may not be in a hurry to have High Court rule on alternative marriage
February 9, 2012
Laura McMullen: 10 Least Expensive Public Schools for Out-of-State Students
Kimberly Palmer: How to actually enjoy -- relaxing, financially -- your vacation
February 8, 2012
Warren Richey: Why momentous Prop. 8 ruling might not satisfy gay-rights groups
Menachem Wecker: Though Controversial, LL.M.'s Can Lead to Specialized Legal Jobs
The Kosher Gourmet byDana Velden: Going to the bother of making soup? You know it better be good. This CREAM OF TOMATO SOUP certainly is! And it's a cinch to make, too (Includes techinques and serving secrets)
February 7, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.: Caught off-guard? President's Super Bowl interview with Matt Lauer gives those who need a reason not to vote for him, a darn good one
Suzanne Bohan: Leaping lizards! Tiny reptiles advancing robot design
February 6, 2012
Jonathan Tobin: Iran Threatens Israel With Destruction, But the New York Times Doesn't Hear It
Jeffrey Fleishman: In newly democratic Egypt, tens of democracy activists jailed, to stand trial; their groups are 'threatening the stability of the homeland'
Julie Deardorff : Researchers say antioxidants may not be that effective and could do more harm than good
Mark Clayton: How did Anonymous hackers eavesdrop on FBI and Scotland Yard?
February 3, 2012
Edmund Sanders : Israeli official says Iran is creating missile that could reach East Coast of US
Victoria Kim: Immigrant-smuggling ring used black drivers to avoid racial profiling
February 2, 2012
Jim Carney: Wrong number call may have saved her life
Reza Kahlili : Ex-CIA spy in Iran's Revolutionary Guard: What Obama doesn't grasp about striking deals with Tehran
Tina Susman: For woodchuck rescuer, every day is Groundhog Day
February 1, 2012
Brian Bennett: US officials see increasing threat of domestic attack from Iran
Emily Brandon: How to Take Advantage of New 401(k) Fee Disclosures
January 31, 2012
January 30, 2012
Paul Richter and Ramin Mostaghim: Misreading Teheran's limits -- deadly and economically devastating as they may be -- is a risk administration, Europe seem willing to take
Suzanne Bohan: Warning: Nap-deprived tots missing more than sleep, study finds
Meg Handley: Banks Revamping Rewards Programs to Woo Customers
January 27, 2012
Caroline B. Glick: Obama: Of course I intend to prevent a nuclear holocaust . . . in a few months
Yochonon Donn: In liberal New York City, fervently-Orthodox Jews may soon be getting a district to call their own
Jeannine Stein: An inflated ego and thinking you're 'all that' doesn't just make others sick of you, it can make you ill
Katy Hopkins: New budget rules may affect how much money you get for college
January 26, 2012
Ed Koch: To the New York Times, calling for the murder of Jews by those capable of having their incitement taken seriously isn't news
Jeannine Stein: Mental illness struck one in five U.S. adults in 2010: Report
January 25, 2012
Richard Simon: House passes two bills endorsing the use of religious symbols at military memorials
Fred Weir: Putin: Multiethnic Russia cannot survive as a US-style 'melting pot'; must find its own way
Susan Johnston: 5 Sneaky Coupon Strategies Consumers Should Watch Out For
January 24, 2012
Carol Clark: The price of your soul: How your brain decides whether to 'sell out'
Caroline B. Glick: America lost most in 'Arab Spring'. Sadly, many voters still don't grasp the extent
Warren Richey: Drug criminal scores win in GPS ruling from conservative-leaning high court
Erika Bolstad: Black conservatives gather to talk about gaining strength
January 23, 2012
Melissa Dribben: Jewish voters to play a key role in Florida's Republican primary
Jordan Rau: In quest to grow, Catholic hospital system will announce this morning its break from church
Ali Safi: U.S. envoy gives Taliban terms for peace talks
January 19, 2012
January 18, 2012
January 17, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney Jr.: No-kidding red lines: U.S. response to an Iranian nuke may be bluster, but Israel's won't be
David G. Savage: They sued their principals after slandering them online --- now the cases are headed to the Supreme Court
David Francis: Where to Invest in 2012: With stocks expected to rebound, opportunity abounds for investors
January 13, 2012
Ben Lynfield: Israeli lawmakers move to annex Jewish Judea, one museum at a time
Alexia Elejalde-Ruiz: Thriving through touch: Gentle massage helps older people with low mobility improve in mind and body
January 12, 2012
Warren Richey: Landmark Supreme Court ruling a 'resounding win' for religious groups
Warren Richey: Supreme Court says no to new rule on eyewitness testimony
John Fauber : Statins found to raise diabetes risk in postmenopausal women
Katy Hopkins : Consider This Before You Pay for an Online Degree
The Kosher Gourmet by Joseph Erdos: This mushroom and barley soup has an intense -- almost nutty -- flavor that mixes robust with Middle East. It has creaminess without cream
January 11, 2012
Shari Roan: Millions of atrial fibrillation sufferers at risk for devastating, but preventable, stroke
Tom Hussain: Pakistan -- recipient of more than $21 billion in civilian and military aid -- speeds pursuit of Iranian pipeline, defying US
David G. Savage: High court signals it won't be loosening TV's 'indecency' rules
Stephen Ceasar: Oklahoma's Islamic law amendment can't go into effect, court rules
January 10, 2012
Reza Kahlili: From an ex-CIA spy: US must exploit new split in Iran's Revolutionary Guard
Karen Kaplan: Study: Nicotine replacement products ineffective when used in real-life situations
January 9, 2012
Michael Doyle: Put through legal hell over dream home, couple fought back hard --- all the way to Supreme Court
|
| |
Jewish World Review
Jan. 8, 2007
/ 18 Teves 5767
The Dems' Best Shot at Reform
By
Jonathan Rauch
| 
|
|
|
|
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com |
In 1996, a newly Republican Congress ended welfare as we knew it. In doing so, the
Republicans improved a New Deal program that had become archaic, counterproductive,
and dependency-forming. They also improved the public's image of Republicans. By
defining the GOP as a party of ideas rather than interests, they burnished its
reformist credentials and helped propel George W. Bush to the White House.
Fast-forward a decade. Once again, Congress has changed hands. Once again, the new
majority needs to signal that it stands for more than business as usual. Once again,
an archaic, counterproductive, and dependency-inducing New Deal program is ripe for
reform. Once again, a consensus has emerged on the general direction for reform.
This time, the opportunity is to end farm welfare as we know it.
In 2007, agricultural subsidies come up for reauthorization. Numbingly complex and
arcane, farm bills have traditionally been of interest mainly to the agriculture
lobbyists and farm-region legislators who wrote them in the Capitol's back rooms. In
2007, however, all Democratic lawmakers, not just the farm groupies, would be well
advised to pay attention.
Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., is certainly taking notice. Though not a member of the
Agriculture Committee, "I've been preparing for this reauthorization, and I plan to
be actively involved," he said in a recent interview. "It's critically important to
my state, which is shortchanged by the farm bill." His district has fruit, wine,
nurseries, and "the largest Christmas tree farm in America" all outside the
charmed circle of federal farm subsidies.
Blumenauer's political calculus, however, is national as well as local. "I think the
farm bill is perhaps the best example of federal policy frozen in time, in a mixture
of inertia, political considerations, and complexity," he says. "It currently is not
serving most states, it's not serving most farmers, it's not fiscally conservative."
He sees agriculture as one of only two ripe opportunities for Democrats to prove
themselves as reformers in 2007 (the other being energy). "We have a chance," he
says, "to send the message that we're serious about making government work right."
No one, not anyone, would sit down today and design the current farm programs.
Although much revised in their details, they remain a paradigm of New Deal
heavy-handedness, distorting markets in a way that accomplishes little at high cost.
Subsidies are absurdly lopsided: 93 percent of payments flow to five crops (corn,
cotton, rice, soybeans, and wheat), which together account for only a fifth of U.S.
farm receipts. Meanwhile, 60 percent of farmers and ranchers get nothing.
Payments flow disproportionately to large farms and wealthy farmers. Much of the
subsidies' value is sopped up by higher land prices, often benefiting absentee
landowners instead of working farmers. Worst of all, the steepest price is paid by
desperately poor farmers in the developing world, who must compete not only with
American farmers but also with the U.S. Treasury.
Expert opinion has in recent years converged on an alternative approach, called
revenue assurance. If the goal is to give farmers more income stability than
volatile agricultural markets provide and that, these days, is the only goal that
most people agree has a public-policy justification then revenue assurance is, in
principle, a fairer and more efficient way to do it. The government and subsidized
private insurers could indemnify farmers against sharp declines in earnings;
government-supported "farm savings accounts" could provide further protection.
As it happens, such an approach fits neatly into a framework that is emerging as the
Democrats' alternative to old-fashioned government handouts. The government and the
private sector have steadily shifted economic risk "onto the fragile balance sheets
of American families," Jacob S. Hacker, a political scientist at Yale University,
argues in his recent book The Great Risk Shift. Moreover, he says, "the job market
has grown markedly more uncertain and unstable." Hacker and other Democratic-aligned
thinkers argue for a new focus on wage insurance and other methods of reducing
income volatility.
Just being not-Republicans worked for the Democrats in 2006, but it is unlikely to
suffice in 2008. Democrats need a plausible alternative to the Republican model of
increasing personal choice but also increasing personal risk by partially
privatizing Social Security and Medicare. The farm bill thus comes along at a
providential moment, offering a test bed and showcase for a big idea at a time when
the party sorely needs one.
None of that would matter if reform were politically impossible, but it is not.
Difficult, yes. "If I were a betting man, I'd bet that the next one would look like
the present farm bill with a bit of fiddling," says Robert L. Thompson, an
agricultural economist at the University of Illinois (Urbana-Champaign) and a former
Agriculture Department chief economist. "But the probabilities are just a little bit
higher than normal that we'll get more-fundamental change."
Many farmers not most, but more than previously are supporting change. The
corn lobby is talking up revenue assurance. Growers of fruits, vegetables, nuts, and
other nonsubsidy crops, who mainly sat out the writing of earlier farm bills, have
organized to demand fairer treatment in the new one. "That's a very significant new
development," says Ken Cook, president of the Environmental Working Group, which
advocates reform.
Environmentalists, anti-hunger groups, and international development organizations
are also lobbying for change. Environmentalists want a shift toward conservation,
and some, such as the American Farmland Trust, call for replacing crop-specific
subsidies with revenue insurance. Bread for the World (motto: "Seeking Justice.
Ending Hunger") likewise calls for a subsidy phaseout and an emphasis on mitigating
farmers' financial risk. Development organizations want to curtail subsidies that
hammer poor farmers in developing countries.
Something else: "Latino groups are rallying around the farm bill," says Rick Swartz,
a Washington consultant who is organizing an alliance of reformist groups. Latinos,
many of them former field laborers, are the fastest-growing demographic cohort of
new farmers, Swartz says, and most of them grow unsubsidized specialty crops. In
September, the National Latino Congreso passed a resolution calling for reform a
first, Swartz says.
Democrats will not have failed to notice that many of these change advocates are
core Democratic constituencies. Nor, probably, will they have missed that today's
subsidies flow in vast disproportion to deep-red Republican states in the South and
Midwest. Hmm. Then there is the fact that the farm bill is must-pass legislation.
Congress will have to send something to President Bush, and he will have to sign
something. That is an advantage that welfare reformers never had.
To realize all of this reform potential, two things must happen. First, the
Democrats' leaders must seize the issue from the back-room farm interests, elevate
it to national prominence, and demand a transformational farm bill instead of a
transactional one. Second, Bush must join the effort, as former President Bill
Clinton did with welfare. One party can't overhaul a bipartisan program, and only
Bush's threat to veto a business-as-usual bill can prevent backsliding.
Here again, the stars seem aligned. In 2002, Bush called for a reformist farm bill
but retreated under pressure from Republican aggies. "Now the president is in a
different situation," Blumenauer says. "It's all about legacy now." Agriculture
Secretary Mike Johanns is energetically promoting reform, calling the 2007 farm bill
"a great opportunity ... to refresh the way we view agricultural support and farm
policy," as he put it in a November speech. "His speeches," says Cook, the
environmentalist, "are music to a lot of our ears."
Bush, no less than congressional Democrats, needs to show he can be a change agent.
"If the president, in his State of the Union, would lay down a marker that he won't
accept a [conventional] farm bill," Blumenauer contends, "he could help the
reformers in Congress, and it could be a significant achievement as they leave the
stage."
A pipe dream? Maybe. Ending farm subsidies as we know them would be a minor miracle.
But then, the 1986 tax reform and the 1996 welfare reform acts were minor miracles,
and both happened under divided government and amid fierce partisanship. "Once the
politics get aligned on this," Blumenauer says, "I think real progress could happen
quickly." The biggest unknown is whether the Democrats will have the vision to view
the farm bill as seed corn instead of pork.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Jonathan Rauch is a senior writer and columnist for National Journal. Comment by clicking here.
Jonathan Rauch Archives
© 2006, Jonathan Rauch
|
|

Arnold Ahlert
Mitch Albom
Jay Ambrose
Michael Barone
Barrywood
Tony Blankley
Lori Borgman
Stratfor Briefing
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Richard Z. Chesnoff
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Alan Douglas
Larry Elder
Suzanne Fields
Frank J. Gaffney
Bernie Goldberg
Jonah Goldberg
Julia Gorin
Jonathan Gurwitz
Paul Greenberg
Argus Hamilton
Victor Davis Hanson
Betsy Hart
Ron Hart
Nat Hentoff
Marybeth Hicks
David Horowitz
Jeff Jacoby
Renee James
Paul Johnson
Jack Kelly
Ed Koch
Ch. Krauthammer
Michael Ledeen
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Kathryn Lopez
Rich Lowry
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Ann McFeatters
Dale McFeatters
Dana Milbank
Jeanne Moos
Dick Morris
Jim Mullen
Deroy Murdock
Judge A. Napolitano
Bill O'Reilly
Kathleen Parker
Star Parker
Dennis Prager
Wesley Pruden
Tom Purcell
Sharon Randall
Robert Robb
Cokie & Steve Roberts
Heather Robinson
Pat Sajak
Debra J. Saunders
Martin Schram
Culture Shlock
David Shribman
Roger Simon
Michael Smerconish
Thomas Sowell
Ben Stein
Mark Steyn
John Stossel
Cal Thomas
Dan Thomasson
Bob Tyrrell
Ben Wattenberg
Diana West
Dave Weinbaum
George Will
Walter Williams
Byron York
ZeitGeist
Mort Zuckerman

Robert Arial
Chuck Asay
Baloo
Chip Bok
Dry Bones
Lisa Benson
John Branch
John Cole
J. D. Crowe
John Deering
Brian Duffy
Everything's Relative
Mallard Fillmore
Glenn Foden
Jake Fuller
Bob Gorrel
Joe Heller
David Hitch
Jerry Holbert
Lee Judge
Steve Kelley
Jeff Koterba
Dick Locher
Jimmy Margulies
Rick McKee
Michael Ramirez
Kevin Siers
Jeff Stahler
Ed Stein
Danna Summers
John Trever
Gary Varvel
Kirk Walters

Mr. Know-It-All
Dr. Peter Gott
GET A JOB! by Marty Nemko
Richard Lederer
Frugal Living
Tech Maven
On Nutrition
Bookmark These
Bruce Williams
|