May 22, 2013
They launched the 'Arab Spring' but now yearn for the good old days of a strongman
May 20, 2013
Richard A. Serrano: Is Meir Kahane's assassin now a changed man?
Genetic copies of living people from embryos no longer science fiction
Jewz in the Newz by Nate Bloom :
The Kosher Gourmet by Cathy Pollak:
Jews Inducted into Rock Hall of Fame; Anton Yelchin co-stars in New "Trek" film; Kutcher (but not Kunis) visits Israel; Jewish TV Star Praises Jewish Rap Star
WARNING: This WALNUT CAKE WITH PRALINE FROSTING, perfect for afternoon coffee, is addicting
May 13, 2013
Rabbi Nathan Lopes Cardozo: Why the giving of the document that would permanently change the world could only be done in desolation
David G. Savage:
Church-state, literally? Supreme Court weighing public school graduation in a church
May 10, 2013
Rabbi Berel Wein: Be all that you should be
May 8, 2013
Peter Ford: Why China is welcoming both Israel's Netanyahu and Palestinians' Abbas
Obama administration quietly backs out of appeal over new contraceptive mandate
At Kerry-Putin meeting, US-Russia relations thaw --- a tad
The Kosher Gourmet by Leela Cyd Ross :
Almost too pretty to eat, this colorful salad with Sicilian inspiration will tickle the taste buds and delight your visual sensibility
May 6, 2013
May 3, 2013
Kids, kittens the Same?
With employee perks at struggling Internet pioneer Yahoo! it's hard to tell
Artificial kidney offers hope to patients tethered to a dialysis machine
April 29, 2013
Poland's new Jewish museum celebrates life, doesn't revisit Holocaust
Terrorism in America: Is US missing a chance to learn from failed plots?
Boston Bomber's 'Svengali' Revealed
Tiny satellites + cellphones = cheaper 'eyes in the sky' for NASA
April 26, 2013
Clifford D. May:
Defense in the Age of Jihadist Terrorism
Sharon Palmer, R.D.:
How to feel your best -- with plenty of energy, a healthy weight and optimal mental and physical function -- without driving yourself batty
April 24, 2013
Jewish World Review
Jan. 31, 2005
/ 21 Shevat, 5765
How technology is causing abortion supporters lose their edge
A new industry has developed around the ultrasound technology used as a diagnostic tool in medicine. Parents-to-be are having vanity ultrasound portraits taken of their unborn children.
In fact, so many people are now taking "pre-baby" photos and so many unregulated "studios" are popping up to offer the service that doctors groups and the Food and Drug Administration have issued warnings about the dangers of ultrasound misuse.
Ultrasound is peeling back the curtain on the unrevealed child in utero. Or, as some people will choose to refer to it, a fetus. Medical technology, at the same time, is rendering obsolete much of the language of the abortion debate.
How does one know if an unborn child is a baby or a fetus?
The question was highlighted by a gruesome crime that took place last month in Missouri. Authorities have charged Lisa Montgomery with strangling Bobbie Jo Stinnett, who was eight months pregnant.
Montgomery, however, did more. According to one Associated Press report, she's also accused of "cutting out the fetus and taking the baby."
Ponder that feat of linguistic gymnastics. Was Stinnett pregnant with one child the fetus and Montgomery took another child the baby? Or was there only one child involved and some transformative event occurred in the instant between being cut out and taken?
The answer, of course, is neither. There was only one child, but no transformative event. The child, a girl, was as much a baby before she was cut from her mother's womb as after. Miraculously, she survived and eventually was reunited with her father.
Prebirth ultrasounds and the archaic reasoning revealed in the Stinnett murder make some people in the pro-choice movement distinctly uncomfortable. For them, anything that might confer babyhood on a fetus, anything that might affect people's perceptions about an unrestricted policy of abortion on demand is viewed as a threat.
Frances Kissling, president of Catholics for Free Choice, recently told pro-choice activists they need to reconsider "the value of the fetus." In the winter issue of Free Choice magazine, she observed the political consequences of "what appears to be an absolute right to abortion that brooks no consideration of other values."
"As the fetus has become more visible through both antiabortion efforts and advances in fetal medicine," Kissling admonished, "this stance has become less satisfying as either a moral framework or a message strategy."
Some Democratic leaders, including Sens. John Kerry and Hillary Rodham Clinton and several candidates for national party chairman, are echoing that sentiment. Which is for the good. The terms of the political debate about abortion must reconcile with the attitudinal changes wrought by technology.
People who are framing ultrasound photos of their unborn children will not succumb to the notion that their lives are a matter of "choice."
A child ripped from its mother's womb at eight months cannot be a victim while the same child crushed in a surgical procedure is not. The act of being "wanted" does not confer life.
Parents keeping vigils in neo-natal intensive care units will not accept that at 26 weeks of gestation a child is not "viable."
Just more than six years ago, my son was born three months early. In the course of a few hours of panic and unanswered prayers, he arrived dangerously prematurely, just over two pounds and 15 inches long.
In desperate situations, people look for the most inconsequential signs of hope. As an avid fisherman, I knew that the legal minimum to keep a speckled trout, a prized game fish in Texas, was 15 inches. As painful as that mental comparison was, I tried to hearten myself by saying, "He's a keeper."
After months of intensive care from exceptional doctors and staff, my son came home, our prayers answered. Today he is a perfectly healthy boy.
At some hospitals and clinics, however, he would not have been a keeper. In fact, he would not have been a baby.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Jonathan Gurwitz, a columnist for the San Antonio Express-News, is a co-founder and twice served as Director General of the Future Leaders of the Alliance program at NATO Headquarters in Brussels, Belgium. In 1986 he was placed on the Foreign Service Register of the U.S. State Department.Comment by clicking here.
Jonathan Gurwitz Archives
© 2005, Jonathan Gurwitz