
 |
|
February 13, 2012
Binyamin Rose: Back to the Bunker: How a life-risking act by a Christian family during the Holocaust saved a family and built a thriving community a world away
Menachem Wecker: Business Schools Teach Real Estate Despite Troubled Housing Market
February 10, 2012
Lisa M. Krieger: Man with defibrillator demands access to his own heart's information
David G. Savage: Why activists may not be in a hurry to have High Court rule on alternative marriage
February 9, 2012
Laura McMullen: 10 Least Expensive Public Schools for Out-of-State Students
Kimberly Palmer: How to actually enjoy -- relaxing, financially -- your vacation
February 8, 2012
Warren Richey: Why momentous Prop. 8 ruling might not satisfy gay-rights groups
Menachem Wecker: Though Controversial, LL.M.'s Can Lead to Specialized Legal Jobs
The Kosher Gourmet byDana Velden: Going to the bother of making soup? You know it better be good. This CREAM OF TOMATO SOUP certainly is! And it's a cinch to make, too (Includes techinques and serving secrets)
February 7, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.: Caught off-guard? President's Super Bowl interview with Matt Lauer gives those who need a reason not to vote for him, a darn good one
Suzanne Bohan: Leaping lizards! Tiny reptiles advancing robot design
February 6, 2012
Jonathan Tobin: Iran Threatens Israel With Destruction, But the New York Times Doesn't Hear It
Jeffrey Fleishman: In newly democratic Egypt, tens of democracy activists jailed, to stand trial; their groups are 'threatening the stability of the homeland'
Julie Deardorff : Researchers say antioxidants may not be that effective and could do more harm than good
Mark Clayton: How did Anonymous hackers eavesdrop on FBI and Scotland Yard?
February 3, 2012
Edmund Sanders : Israeli official says Iran is creating missile that could reach East Coast of US
Victoria Kim: Immigrant-smuggling ring used black drivers to avoid racial profiling
February 2, 2012
Jim Carney: Wrong number call may have saved her life
Reza Kahlili : Ex-CIA spy in Iran's Revolutionary Guard: What Obama doesn't grasp about striking deals with Tehran
Tina Susman: For woodchuck rescuer, every day is Groundhog Day
February 1, 2012
Brian Bennett: US officials see increasing threat of domestic attack from Iran
Emily Brandon: How to Take Advantage of New 401(k) Fee Disclosures
January 31, 2012
January 30, 2012
Paul Richter and Ramin Mostaghim: Misreading Teheran's limits -- deadly and economically devastating as they may be -- is a risk administration, Europe seem willing to take
Suzanne Bohan: Warning: Nap-deprived tots missing more than sleep, study finds
Meg Handley: Banks Revamping Rewards Programs to Woo Customers
January 27, 2012
Caroline B. Glick: Obama: Of course I intend to prevent a nuclear holocaust . . . in a few months
Yochonon Donn: In liberal New York City, fervently-Orthodox Jews may soon be getting a district to call their own
Jeannine Stein: An inflated ego and thinking you're 'all that' doesn't just make others sick of you, it can make you ill
Katy Hopkins: New budget rules may affect how much money you get for college
January 26, 2012
Ed Koch: To the New York Times, calling for the murder of Jews by those capable of having their incitement taken seriously isn't news
Jeannine Stein: Mental illness struck one in five U.S. adults in 2010: Report
January 25, 2012
Richard Simon: House passes two bills endorsing the use of religious symbols at military memorials
Fred Weir: Putin: Multiethnic Russia cannot survive as a US-style 'melting pot'; must find its own way
Susan Johnston: 5 Sneaky Coupon Strategies Consumers Should Watch Out For
January 24, 2012
Carol Clark: The price of your soul: How your brain decides whether to 'sell out'
Caroline B. Glick: America lost most in 'Arab Spring'. Sadly, many voters still don't grasp the extent
Warren Richey: Drug criminal scores win in GPS ruling from conservative-leaning high court
Erika Bolstad: Black conservatives gather to talk about gaining strength
January 23, 2012
Melissa Dribben: Jewish voters to play a key role in Florida's Republican primary
Jordan Rau: In quest to grow, Catholic hospital system will announce this morning its break from church
Ali Safi: U.S. envoy gives Taliban terms for peace talks
January 19, 2012
January 18, 2012
January 17, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney Jr.: No-kidding red lines: U.S. response to an Iranian nuke may be bluster, but Israel's won't be
David G. Savage: They sued their principals after slandering them online --- now the cases are headed to the Supreme Court
David Francis: Where to Invest in 2012: With stocks expected to rebound, opportunity abounds for investors
January 13, 2012
Ben Lynfield: Israeli lawmakers move to annex Jewish Judea, one museum at a time
Alexia Elejalde-Ruiz: Thriving through touch: Gentle massage helps older people with low mobility improve in mind and body
January 12, 2012
Warren Richey: Landmark Supreme Court ruling a 'resounding win' for religious groups
Warren Richey: Supreme Court says no to new rule on eyewitness testimony
John Fauber : Statins found to raise diabetes risk in postmenopausal women
Katy Hopkins : Consider This Before You Pay for an Online Degree
The Kosher Gourmet by Joseph Erdos: This mushroom and barley soup has an intense -- almost nutty -- flavor that mixes robust with Middle East. It has creaminess without cream
January 11, 2012
Shari Roan: Millions of atrial fibrillation sufferers at risk for devastating, but preventable, stroke
Tom Hussain: Pakistan -- recipient of more than $21 billion in civilian and military aid -- speeds pursuit of Iranian pipeline, defying US
David G. Savage: High court signals it won't be loosening TV's 'indecency' rules
Stephen Ceasar: Oklahoma's Islamic law amendment can't go into effect, court rules
January 10, 2012
Reza Kahlili: From an ex-CIA spy: US must exploit new split in Iran's Revolutionary Guard
Karen Kaplan: Study: Nicotine replacement products ineffective when used in real-life situations
January 9, 2012
Michael Doyle: Put through legal hell over dream home, couple fought back hard --- all the way to Supreme Court
|
| |
Jewish World Review
April 3, 2006
/ 5 Nissan, 5766
RAT OR RAP?
By
Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir
Should I turn in a colleague for inappropriate acts?
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com |
Q: My workplace has a "zero tolerance" policy for
visits to inappropriate web sites. All employees are
supposed to immediate report such behavior to
management. Should I go straight to management with
such cases?
A: It's a good thing your workplace is sensitive to
the damage these immodest websites can do to the
worker's own moral fiber, to the offense they can
cause to fellow workers, and to the disruption they
can cause to performance. However, the policy you
describe to fight the phenomenon does not sound like a
wise one.
In Jewish law and tradition informing on someone is
generally a last resort. The preferred first line of
action is to turn directly to the wrongdoer with a
gentle reminder. There are two different ethical
principles behind this preference.
One reason for starting with the wrongdoer is that
this fulfills the Torah commandment of reproof.
"Surely reproove your fellow, and don't bear sin
towards him." This commandment is not directed
towards the protection of any third parties, but
rather for the benefit of the wrongdoer himself, to
gently remind of the the right way in life.
Furthermore, informing on others is itself a forbidden
activity, unless certain conditions are met. The Torah
tells us "don't go about as a gossip-monger among your
people," meaning we should not spread malicious
information. This prohibition is superceded only when
the disclosure meets certain conditions, which we have
called the "ABCs" of forbidden speech:
Accuracy: we must relate the information accurately,
without exaggeration or judgment.
Benefit: the revelation must be the only way to
promote some constructive benefit
Certainty: we shouldn't relate hearsay.
Desire: our intention must be to bring about the
constructive benefit, not to disparage the wrongdoer.
Equity: the steps the hearer will take to protect
himself shouldn't cause immoderate and undeserved harm
to the wrongdoer.
In many cases turning directly to the wrongdoer will
rectify the problem, so informing would not be the
only way to promote the constructive benefit; the
benefit condition would thus be violated.
The certainty condition may also be violated. Any
internet user knows how easy it is to get accidentally
redirected to inappropriate sites, and it may be that
the colleague in question never had any intention of
entering forbidden web pages.
Depending on the reaction of management, the equity
condition is also jeopardized. If disciplinary action
is immediately taken against a worker for a one-time
infraction, this sounds to me like an excessive
reaction. The Talmud tells us that a worker shouldn't
be summarily fired for minor mistakes on the job; only
for severe and irreparable ones. A commensurability
standard should also apply to reprimands.
An immediate reaction could possible be justified if
for some reason your company would face immediate
damage from inappropriate web visits of employees. (I
don't know why this would apply.) In this case, the
employer could be justified in taking action.
Otherwise, it would seem that the only permissible
response would be for them to issue a reminder; but in
this case, it is hard to see what you gain by going to
management instead of gently reminding your colleague
by yourself.
For these reasons, it would seem much more appropriate
to allow workers to respond to forbidden behavior by
simply giving a gentle reminder to their colleagues.
The claim could be made that workers waive their right
to protection by agreeing to the "rat first" policy,
but I would be reluctant to sanction the waiving of
such a fundamental right without compelling
justification.
I would recommend asking those responsible for this
policy what the justification is. If it seems that
there truly is a clear and present danger to the
workplace from employee visits to forbidden
sites, and if their reaction to information is
balanced, the policy could be justified. A balanced
policy means that employees have a chance to defend
themselves (insuring that the information acted on is
accurate), that they are given the benefit of the
doubt, and most importantly that the reaction of the
management is commensurate. For example, the first
report would involve a reminder, then a reprimand,
and so on.
But if the policy dictates a draconian reaction to
colleague reports, I personally would avoid policing
my colleagues and instead just look the other way.
(Actually, I always look the other way when I am
confronted by these sites anyway.)
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes inspiring articles. Sign up for our daily update. It's free. Just click here.
THE JEWISH ETHICIST, NOW IN BOOK FORM
You've enjoyed his columns on JWR for years. Now the Jewish Ethicist has culled his most intriguing and controversial offerings in book form. HARDCOVER PAPERBACK Sales help fund JWR.
|
JWR contributor Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir, formerly of the Council of Economic Advisers in the Reagan
administration, is Research Director of the Business Ethics Center of Jerusalem, Jerusalem College of Technology.
To comment or pose a question, please click here.
Previously:
Priority in charitable giving
Trolls and ogres
How many hours of work is too many?
Can I promote my product by having it unobtrusively written into a story?
He's not heavy he's my brother
All's fair in war?, II
All's fair in war?
Girth vs. worth
Is it proper to tax bequests?
Ethics of Being Overweight
Penalized for working swiftly
When is it a bluff?
'Rate and switch'
My paycheck is late!
Should schools cater to an elite?
All's fair in love?
Comfort and Competition
Do I need the caller's permission to put a call on the speakerphone?
Overtime for lost time
Is it unethical to play suppliers against each other to get the lowest bid possible?
Do family members have precedence in charity allotments?
What the world of business can teach us about our annual process of repentance and renewal
Are religious leaders subject to criticism?
Vindictive Vendor: How can I punish an abusive competitor?
Blogging Ethics: Is the blogger responsible for defamatory posts?

© 2005, The Jewish Ethicist is produced by the JCT Center for Business Ethics
|