 |
|
February 13, 2012
Binyamin Rose: Back to the Bunker: How a life-risking act by a Christian family during the Holocaust saved a family and built a thriving community a world away
Menachem Wecker: Business Schools Teach Real Estate Despite Troubled Housing Market
February 10, 2012
Lisa M. Krieger: Man with defibrillator demands access to his own heart's information
David G. Savage: Why activists may not be in a hurry to have High Court rule on alternative marriage
February 9, 2012
Laura McMullen: 10 Least Expensive Public Schools for Out-of-State Students
Kimberly Palmer: How to actually enjoy -- relaxing, financially -- your vacation
February 8, 2012
Warren Richey: Why momentous Prop. 8 ruling might not satisfy gay-rights groups
Menachem Wecker: Though Controversial, LL.M.'s Can Lead to Specialized Legal Jobs
The Kosher Gourmet byDana Velden: Going to the bother of making soup? You know it better be good. This CREAM OF TOMATO SOUP certainly is! And it's a cinch to make, too (Includes techinques and serving secrets)
February 7, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.: Caught off-guard? President's Super Bowl interview with Matt Lauer gives those who need a reason not to vote for him, a darn good one
Suzanne Bohan: Leaping lizards! Tiny reptiles advancing robot design
February 6, 2012
Jonathan Tobin: Iran Threatens Israel With Destruction, But the New York Times Doesn't Hear It
Jeffrey Fleishman: In newly democratic Egypt, tens of democracy activists jailed, to stand trial; their groups are 'threatening the stability of the homeland'
Julie Deardorff : Researchers say antioxidants may not be that effective and could do more harm than good
Mark Clayton: How did Anonymous hackers eavesdrop on FBI and Scotland Yard?
February 3, 2012
Edmund Sanders : Israeli official says Iran is creating missile that could reach East Coast of US
Victoria Kim: Immigrant-smuggling ring used black drivers to avoid racial profiling
February 2, 2012
Jim Carney: Wrong number call may have saved her life
Reza Kahlili : Ex-CIA spy in Iran's Revolutionary Guard: What Obama doesn't grasp about striking deals with Tehran
Tina Susman: For woodchuck rescuer, every day is Groundhog Day
February 1, 2012
Brian Bennett: US officials see increasing threat of domestic attack from Iran
Emily Brandon: How to Take Advantage of New 401(k) Fee Disclosures
January 31, 2012
January 30, 2012
Paul Richter and Ramin Mostaghim: Misreading Teheran's limits -- deadly and economically devastating as they may be -- is a risk administration, Europe seem willing to take
Suzanne Bohan: Warning: Nap-deprived tots missing more than sleep, study finds
Meg Handley: Banks Revamping Rewards Programs to Woo Customers
January 27, 2012
Caroline B. Glick: Obama: Of course I intend to prevent a nuclear holocaust . . . in a few months
Yochonon Donn: In liberal New York City, fervently-Orthodox Jews may soon be getting a district to call their own
Jeannine Stein: An inflated ego and thinking you're 'all that' doesn't just make others sick of you, it can make you ill
Katy Hopkins: New budget rules may affect how much money you get for college
January 26, 2012
Ed Koch: To the New York Times, calling for the murder of Jews by those capable of having their incitement taken seriously isn't news
Jeannine Stein: Mental illness struck one in five U.S. adults in 2010: Report
January 25, 2012
Richard Simon: House passes two bills endorsing the use of religious symbols at military memorials
Fred Weir: Putin: Multiethnic Russia cannot survive as a US-style 'melting pot'; must find its own way
Susan Johnston: 5 Sneaky Coupon Strategies Consumers Should Watch Out For
January 24, 2012
Carol Clark: The price of your soul: How your brain decides whether to 'sell out'
Caroline B. Glick: America lost most in 'Arab Spring'. Sadly, many voters still don't grasp the extent
Warren Richey: Drug criminal scores win in GPS ruling from conservative-leaning high court
Erika Bolstad: Black conservatives gather to talk about gaining strength
January 23, 2012
Melissa Dribben: Jewish voters to play a key role in Florida's Republican primary
Jordan Rau: In quest to grow, Catholic hospital system will announce this morning its break from church
Ali Safi: U.S. envoy gives Taliban terms for peace talks
January 19, 2012
January 18, 2012
January 17, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney Jr.: No-kidding red lines: U.S. response to an Iranian nuke may be bluster, but Israel's won't be
David G. Savage: They sued their principals after slandering them online --- now the cases are headed to the Supreme Court
David Francis: Where to Invest in 2012: With stocks expected to rebound, opportunity abounds for investors
January 13, 2012
Ben Lynfield: Israeli lawmakers move to annex Jewish Judea, one museum at a time
Alexia Elejalde-Ruiz: Thriving through touch: Gentle massage helps older people with low mobility improve in mind and body
January 12, 2012
Warren Richey: Landmark Supreme Court ruling a 'resounding win' for religious groups
Warren Richey: Supreme Court says no to new rule on eyewitness testimony
John Fauber : Statins found to raise diabetes risk in postmenopausal women
Katy Hopkins : Consider This Before You Pay for an Online Degree
The Kosher Gourmet by Joseph Erdos: This mushroom and barley soup has an intense -- almost nutty -- flavor that mixes robust with Middle East. It has creaminess without cream
January 11, 2012
Shari Roan: Millions of atrial fibrillation sufferers at risk for devastating, but preventable, stroke
Tom Hussain: Pakistan -- recipient of more than $21 billion in civilian and military aid -- speeds pursuit of Iranian pipeline, defying US
David G. Savage: High court signals it won't be loosening TV's 'indecency' rules
Stephen Ceasar: Oklahoma's Islamic law amendment can't go into effect, court rules
January 10, 2012
Reza Kahlili: From an ex-CIA spy: US must exploit new split in Iran's Revolutionary Guard
Karen Kaplan: Study: Nicotine replacement products ineffective when used in real-life situations
January 9, 2012
Michael Doyle: Put through legal hell over dream home, couple fought back hard --- all the way to Supreme Court
|
| |
Jewish World Review
Sept. 26, 2005
/ 22 Elul, 5765
Clerical criticism
By
Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir
Are religious leaders subject to criticism?
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com |
Q: You recently wrote that while blogs should protect the privacy of private individuals, they don't need to
block reasonable discussions of the qualifications of public figures. Does this include religious leaders?
What are the boundaries?
A: My recent column on blogging ethics generated a lot of interesting reader comment and, not surprisingly, a
fair amount of discussion on blogs. The most common concern by far is the one in this week's question: Is a
rabbi or other religious leader a "public figure"? What are the appropriate ethical boundaries in criticizing
these figures?
In order to answer this question, we have to return to our famous "ABC's" of negative speech. These basic
principles, enunciated by Rav Yisrael Meir Hacohen of Radin in his famous work Chafetz Chaim, hold the key
to explaining my previous statement as well as some significant differences in the case of rabbis and other
spiritual leaders.
The Chafetz Chaim explains that negative speech is only permissible with five conditions:
1. Accuracy — we must be sure to present the facts in an objective fashion, not in a tendentious screed;
2. Benefit — the revelation must be necessary to obtain some benefit, and there must be no alternative way
of obtaining the benefit without damaging comments.
3. Certainty — we need to check our facts and not repeat innuendo
4. Desire — the motivation for our revelation must be to obtain the benefit; if the objective is slander the
revelation is improper even if a benefit will result.
5. Equity — the subject of the revelation, as well any other individuals, should not suffer any undeserved
damage.
If we apply these criteria to the average private person, we see that we have no license to broadcast his or her foibles. What
possible benefit could there be? And even if there is a benefit, any damage or embarrassment caused would be completely
undeserved — what did this poor person do to warrant having his shortcomings broadcast over cyberspace?
But if we apply the exact same criteria to a politician, we find that reasonable criticism will generally meet them. Having a bad
political leader can result in great damage to the community, and having timely knowledge of the abilities and character of
candidates is of benefit because these people typically stand for election at fixed intervals and the information is of practical use
to the community. No one has a right to a political office, so if someone gets voted out because of an item revealed in a blog,
this is not "undeserved."
The most problematic criteria is intention; for this reason I believe that anyone with a private interest in the outcome of the
election should reveal it when giving an opinion on a candidate.
What about a spiritual leader such as a rabbi? We don't need any new criteria, but we will find that our old criteria play out a
little differently.
Accuracy & Certainty: the same evidence which would be pretty convincing regarding an average person might be
unpersuasive regarding a person known for outstanding moral stature. The Torah commands us "Judge your fellow righteously"
(Leviticus 19:15), meaning that we should strive to give others the benefit of the doubt. But if the person in question has a
reputation for upstanding conduct, then giving him or her the benefit of the doubt is not merely a good deed, it is simply good
judgment.
Benefit: Political leaders are chosen in openly contested elections at stated periods. If their foibles are exposed, the public has
a good chance to make use of this information in deciding whether to elect or re-elect them. Furthermore, other methods of
obtaining benefit are seldom practical; a person can't exactly phone up the governor and schmooze with him or her over the
way to improve their failings.
Compare this to the average spiritual leader. Even if we are convinced that they have made mistakes, revelation doesn't always
make the most sense. Many of these people are surprisingly accessible, and so often it is much more practical and ethical to
merely confront them with any concerns. And it is worth asking if letting followers know about shortcomings will ultimately be
of benefit.
Equity: Due to their great moral authority of these leaders, undermining their status can do immense damage to the community
— perhaps more than the damage resulting from having authority in the hands of an imperfect individual. This damage needs to
be considered before deciding that revelation is justified.
This doesn't mean that these criteria can never be fulfilled. Sometimes it will be appropriate or even necessary to conduct a
public discussion of the character and qualifications of religious leaders. But the considerations will be much stricter not
because of any arbitrary "privilege of clergy" but simply because of the consistent application of the underlying principles of
right speech.
One more point needs to be emphasized. Respectful disagreement does not fall into the category of negative speech at all, and
so there is no need to apply the Chafetz Chaim's criteria. If a rabbi gives a sermon and someone comments that he doesn't
know what he is talking about or that he is insensitive to some vital interest, that is negative speech and careful application of
the above criteria would make us extremely reluctant to express ourselves in this way.
But if I say that my opinion is different, that's not slanderous in any way. The fact that I see things differently doesn't detract
from his status in any way. (If a rabbi makes a ruling within the scope of his authority, those subject to this authority are still
allowed to disagree but not to disobey. We are all familiar with the parallel distinction regarding decisions of judges in the
secular law.)
The basic rule for publicizing damaging statements is the same for all individuals: the facts should be checked and expressed in
balanced way; the revelation should be the only way of obtaining some important benefit; and the revelation should not result in
undeserved damage.
But when we apply these criteria to spiritual leaders, we will find that the result is a very strict policy: the facts don't stack up
the same way with regard to a person of great repute; the benefits of revelation are often questionable and the damage often
great. Rabbis and other spiritual leaders should not be immune from criticism or public discussion, but their reputations and
vital community role imply that these criticisms need to be expressed with unusual judgment and care.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes inspiring articles. Sign up for our daily update. It's free. Just click here.
THE JEWISH ETHICIST, NOW IN BOOK FORM
You've enjoyed his columns on JWR for years. Now the Jewish Ethicist has culled his most intriguing — and controversial — offerings in book form.
HARDCOVER
PAPERBACK
Sales help fund JWR.
|
JWR contributor Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir, formerly of the Council of Economic Advisers in the Reagan
administration, is Research Director of the Business Ethics Center of Jerusalem, Jerusalem College of Technology.
To comment or pose a question, please click here.
Previously:
Vindictive Vendor: How can I punish an abusive competitor?
Blogging Ethics: Is the blogger responsible for defamatory posts?
© 2005, The Jewish Ethicist is produced by the JCT Center for Business Ethics
|
