 |
|
Nov. 23, 2009
JWisdom.com: Actually, it really is all about you with Rabbi Lawrence Hajioff
Nov. 20, 2009
Nov. 19, 2009
Jonathan Tobin: ADL Crosses the Line with Report Bashing Obama Critics
Nov. 18, 2009
JWisdom.com: The (Jewish) Dating Game
with Rabbi Lawrence Hajioff (8 minutes)
Nov. 17, 2009
Steven Emerson: How Does the 4th Amendment Impact Terror Finance Investigations?
JWisdom.com: If Frank Sinatra married Edith Piaf
with Rabbi Y.Y. Rubinstein (2 minutes) Life lessons from what would be regarded as the most inappropriate lyrics ever sung
Nov. 16, 2009
JWisdom.com: Deconstructing faith
with Rabbi Warren Goldstein (9 minutes)
Nov. 13, 2009
JWisdom.com Sarah's subjective reality
with Rabbi Sroy Levitansky ( 6 minutes)
Nov. 12, 2009
JWisdom.com Does God get tired?
with Rabbi Harvey Belovski ( 5 minutes)
Nov. 11, 2009
JWisdom.com Marriages are not made in Heaven
with Rabbi Lawrence Hajioff (VERY fast 15 minutes)
Nov. 10, 2009
Michael Doyle: Author of book exposing CAIR ordered to remove supporting documents from Web
JWisdom.com If the creation so loudly shouts the existence of the Creator, why aren't more people believers? with Rabbi Naftali Brawer (9 minutes)
Nov. 9, 2009
Mark Steyn: Shooter exposes hole
in U.S. terror strategy
JWisdom.com It's never too late to
have a happy childhood with Sarah Chana Radcliffe (5 minutes)
Nov. 6, 2009
JWisdom.com Zero to 1/60th: How
to Empower An Hour with Gavriel Aryeh Sande (7 minutes)
Nov. 5, 2009
JWisdom.com Hidden Hints: Unlocking
Faith & Prayer with Rabbi Jay Yaacov Schwartz (10 minutes)
Nov. 4, 2009
JWisdom.com When God played peacemaker
With Rabbi Sroy Levitansky (5 minutes)
Nov. 3, 2009
JWisdom.com Are you are closet idolater?
With Sara Yoheved Rigler (10 minutes)
Nov. 2, 2009
JWisdom.com Abraham's Strange Change
With Rabbi Yitzchok Fingerer (5 minutes)
|
| |
Jewish World Review
June 29, 2009
/ 7 Tamuz 5769
Beware of ‘Caveat Emptor’
By
Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir
| 
|
|
|
|
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com |
Q. Recently you wrote that sellers need to shun misleading practices. Can't we rely on the consumer to defend his own interests?
A. In traditional common law, the basic rule in commerce was "caveat emptor," a Latin term meaning "Let the buyer beware". Since it was the responsibility of the buyer to wary of any problems with the purchase, he had a claim against the seller only if there was actual fraud. Merely finding an unusual defect was not grounds for cancellation.
There were some valid justifications for the caveat emptor rule. One was that only the customer can know what his needs are, and if the product meets them. Another is the desire to have clear and unambiguous laws of transfer to keep the courts from being clogged with endless litigation.
However, this rule created more problems than it solved, and today it has been abandoned in the developed world in favor of an implied warranty of merchantability.
It is true that only the consumer can be totally sure why he wants a product, but it is equally true that when people buy standard products the vast majority have exactly the same expectations, so it is reasonable to demand that the seller fulfill them. And even though only the consumer knows what he wants, typically only the seller is well-versed in the finer aspects of the product, especially if it is one sold seldom. An appliance dealer sells more refrigerators in one day than a typical person buys in a lifetime, so it is in everybody's interest to have the seller share his knowledge with the buyer, especially relating to any defects in the product.
It is noteworthy that Jewish law deals with misleading practices on two distinct levels. On one level, we have the ability to nullify a sale when the merchandise has substantive defects, to the extent that there is no true meeting of the minds. This corresponds to what in secular law is known as the implied warrantee of merchantability.
But there is another level of prohibition which is not actionable, but is still forbidden. This is called geneivas da'st, or "stealing judgment." In these cases the substantive information about the product and price are known, but significant context is missing. One case would be where the item is advertised as being "50% off" whereas in fact the discount is from a temporary markup. The customer is properly informed of the item and the price, but he is misled into thinking it is a bargain. This would also apply to meaningful but non-critical aspects of the product. An example would be selling a product as "natural" to a person who doesn't insist on natural products but views it as a sign of quality.
This highlights the fact that Jewish law is not merely a system of litigation or conflict resolution but also a system of ethical and religious norms. The customer doesn't have recourse but the misleading practice is still forbidden. The name of this prohibition is also instructive. The premise of your question is that we can rely on the judgment of the customer, but in fact sellers have many clever techniques of "stealing" that judgment, of inducing the customer to suspend his critical faculties. Jewish law has always affirmed, and current practice confirms, that we need to beware of "buyer beware."
ARCHIVES
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes inspiring articles. Sign up for our daily update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir, formerly of the Council of Economic Advisers in the Reagan
administration, is Research Director of the Business Ethics Center of Jerusalem, Jerusalem College of Technology.
To comment or pose a question, please click here.
THE JEWISH ETHICIST, NOW IN BOOK FORM
You've enjoyed his columns on JWR for years. Now the Jewish Ethicist has culled his most intriguing — and controversial — offerings in book form.
HARDCOVER
PAPERBACK
Sales help fund JWR.
|
© 2009, The Jewish Ethicist is produced by the JCT Center for Business Ethics
|
