 |
|
February 13, 2012
Binyamin Rose: Back to the Bunker: How a life-risking act by a Christian family during the Holocaust saved a family and built a thriving community a world away
Menachem Wecker: Business Schools Teach Real Estate Despite Troubled Housing Market
February 10, 2012
Lisa M. Krieger: Man with defibrillator demands access to his own heart's information
David G. Savage: Why activists may not be in a hurry to have High Court rule on alternative marriage
February 9, 2012
Laura McMullen: 10 Least Expensive Public Schools for Out-of-State Students
Kimberly Palmer: How to actually enjoy -- relaxing, financially -- your vacation
February 8, 2012
Warren Richey: Why momentous Prop. 8 ruling might not satisfy gay-rights groups
Menachem Wecker: Though Controversial, LL.M.'s Can Lead to Specialized Legal Jobs
The Kosher Gourmet byDana Velden: Going to the bother of making soup? You know it better be good. This CREAM OF TOMATO SOUP certainly is! And it's a cinch to make, too (Includes techinques and serving secrets)
February 7, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.: Caught off-guard? President's Super Bowl interview with Matt Lauer gives those who need a reason not to vote for him, a darn good one
Suzanne Bohan: Leaping lizards! Tiny reptiles advancing robot design
February 6, 2012
Jonathan Tobin: Iran Threatens Israel With Destruction, But the New York Times Doesn't Hear It
Jeffrey Fleishman: In newly democratic Egypt, tens of democracy activists jailed, to stand trial; their groups are 'threatening the stability of the homeland'
Julie Deardorff : Researchers say antioxidants may not be that effective and could do more harm than good
Mark Clayton: How did Anonymous hackers eavesdrop on FBI and Scotland Yard?
February 3, 2012
Edmund Sanders : Israeli official says Iran is creating missile that could reach East Coast of US
Victoria Kim: Immigrant-smuggling ring used black drivers to avoid racial profiling
February 2, 2012
Jim Carney: Wrong number call may have saved her life
Reza Kahlili : Ex-CIA spy in Iran's Revolutionary Guard: What Obama doesn't grasp about striking deals with Tehran
Tina Susman: For woodchuck rescuer, every day is Groundhog Day
February 1, 2012
Brian Bennett: US officials see increasing threat of domestic attack from Iran
Emily Brandon: How to Take Advantage of New 401(k) Fee Disclosures
January 31, 2012
January 30, 2012
Paul Richter and Ramin Mostaghim: Misreading Teheran's limits -- deadly and economically devastating as they may be -- is a risk administration, Europe seem willing to take
Suzanne Bohan: Warning: Nap-deprived tots missing more than sleep, study finds
Meg Handley: Banks Revamping Rewards Programs to Woo Customers
January 27, 2012
Caroline B. Glick: Obama: Of course I intend to prevent a nuclear holocaust . . . in a few months
Yochonon Donn: In liberal New York City, fervently-Orthodox Jews may soon be getting a district to call their own
Jeannine Stein: An inflated ego and thinking you're 'all that' doesn't just make others sick of you, it can make you ill
Katy Hopkins: New budget rules may affect how much money you get for college
January 26, 2012
Ed Koch: To the New York Times, calling for the murder of Jews by those capable of having their incitement taken seriously isn't news
Jeannine Stein: Mental illness struck one in five U.S. adults in 2010: Report
January 25, 2012
Richard Simon: House passes two bills endorsing the use of religious symbols at military memorials
Fred Weir: Putin: Multiethnic Russia cannot survive as a US-style 'melting pot'; must find its own way
Susan Johnston: 5 Sneaky Coupon Strategies Consumers Should Watch Out For
January 24, 2012
Carol Clark: The price of your soul: How your brain decides whether to 'sell out'
Caroline B. Glick: America lost most in 'Arab Spring'. Sadly, many voters still don't grasp the extent
Warren Richey: Drug criminal scores win in GPS ruling from conservative-leaning high court
Erika Bolstad: Black conservatives gather to talk about gaining strength
January 23, 2012
Melissa Dribben: Jewish voters to play a key role in Florida's Republican primary
Jordan Rau: In quest to grow, Catholic hospital system will announce this morning its break from church
Ali Safi: U.S. envoy gives Taliban terms for peace talks
January 19, 2012
January 18, 2012
January 17, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney Jr.: No-kidding red lines: U.S. response to an Iranian nuke may be bluster, but Israel's won't be
David G. Savage: They sued their principals after slandering them online --- now the cases are headed to the Supreme Court
David Francis: Where to Invest in 2012: With stocks expected to rebound, opportunity abounds for investors
January 13, 2012
Ben Lynfield: Israeli lawmakers move to annex Jewish Judea, one museum at a time
Alexia Elejalde-Ruiz: Thriving through touch: Gentle massage helps older people with low mobility improve in mind and body
January 12, 2012
Warren Richey: Landmark Supreme Court ruling a 'resounding win' for religious groups
Warren Richey: Supreme Court says no to new rule on eyewitness testimony
John Fauber : Statins found to raise diabetes risk in postmenopausal women
Katy Hopkins : Consider This Before You Pay for an Online Degree
The Kosher Gourmet by Joseph Erdos: This mushroom and barley soup has an intense -- almost nutty -- flavor that mixes robust with Middle East. It has creaminess without cream
January 11, 2012
Shari Roan: Millions of atrial fibrillation sufferers at risk for devastating, but preventable, stroke
Tom Hussain: Pakistan -- recipient of more than $21 billion in civilian and military aid -- speeds pursuit of Iranian pipeline, defying US
David G. Savage: High court signals it won't be loosening TV's 'indecency' rules
Stephen Ceasar: Oklahoma's Islamic law amendment can't go into effect, court rules
January 10, 2012
Reza Kahlili: From an ex-CIA spy: US must exploit new split in Iran's Revolutionary Guard
Karen Kaplan: Study: Nicotine replacement products ineffective when used in real-life situations
January 9, 2012
Michael Doyle: Put through legal hell over dream home, couple fought back hard --- all the way to Supreme Court
|
| |
Jewish World Review
Nov. 14, 2003
/19 Mar-Cheshvan, 5764
Making sense of a father's ultimate test
By Rabbi Hillel Goldberg
|  |
|
|
|
http://www.jewishworldreview.com |
The twenty-second chapter of Genesis, "the binding of Isaac," which is read publicly this Sabbath, is printed in the daily prayer book after the introductory morning blessings. I would venture to say that not one in 50 people who come to the synagogue each morning recite this. Rightly or wrongly, parts of the introductory service are dispensed with by many daily shul-goers. Certainly, the schedule of the morning prayers in many synagogues does not allow time for the recitation of all of the introductory parts of the service.
On Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur, I like to get to the synagogue about a half hour early to recite "the binding of Isaac" and the passages about the Temple sacrifices that follow. In particular, I like to concentrate on Genesis 22, probably the most difficult passage in all of Scripture. A father is asked by G-d to kill his son! I like to read the verses very slowly, absorbing and looking for solecisms, links, meanings and questions that only a very deliberate reading would reveal. I shun commentaries; I want the special holiness and force of the High Holidays to heighten my insight. I force myself to probe and scrutinize as much as I am able.
Each year, I wish to read the passage as if for the first time, not letting previous understandings, whether my own or those of others, filter the absorption of the pure, powerful words.
Over the years, I have developed four separate insights into this dramatic and ramified passage. One concerns free will; I published this as "Foreknowledge and Free Will" in Tradition (Winter, 2000). Another concerns the impossibility of total communication of personal experience — the ultimate impenetrability of the human being. A third concerns the centrality of Isaac to martyrdom in Jewish history. The fourth one follows.
According to the sages' classification of the Abrahamic passages in Genesis, Abraham underwent 10 trials or tests (Ethics of the Fathers 5:3). Rashi, the foremost commentator, and Nachmanides do not agree on the exact listing, but all agree that the tenth trial was recorded in the last chapter in this week's Torah portion, "the binding of Isaac." Perhaps this is because the opening verse of Genesis 22 calls this a trial or test. "And it happened after these things that G-d tested Abraham and said to him, 'Abraham,' and he replied, 'Here I am'" (22:1).
What, precisely, was Abraham's test, in its fullest sense? Without knowing this, "the binding of Isaac" has no meaning for us besides inspiration. If the only message here is that Abraham was asked to sacrifice his son, then the passage says little to us. G-d will not issue another command to bring a child to the altar, to bind him on it, and then to slaughter and burn. Abraham's experience was unique (not to mention the explicit prohibitions against murder and child sacrifice in other parts of the Torah).
So how does the passage speak to us? If the point is to inspire us with Abraham's perfect faith, well and good, but is that all? Is there another lesson that does speak to our lives? By identifying precisely when Abraham's trial began, we access that lesson.
As one reads the opening verses of the chapter, they do not immediately convey any sense of trial. In the case of Isaac, the reader is many verses into the story before one is told that Isaac realizes what his trek to Mount Moriah is for. Even in the case of Abraham, the opening verse, in which G-d does nothing more than summon Abraham, gives no clue.
The first half of the next verse tells Abraham to take his son to the land of Moriah; only in the second half of the verse is it revealed to Abraham to "bring him up there as an offering upon one of the mountains which I shall tell you."
A famous rabbinic commentary on the first half of the verse is this: G-d to Abraham: "Please take your son" (Abraham to G-d: I have two sons, which one?) "your only one" (Abraham: this one, Ishmael, is an only son to his mother Hagar, and that one, Isaac, is an only one to his mother Sarah) "whom you love" (Abraham: I love them both!) "Isaac." Even under this dialogue, all that Abraham knows is that he is to take Isaac. For what? No reason is yet given.
This problem here is this: The entire Scriptural passage, "the binding of Isaac," is regarded as conveying Abraham's test. But no test seems to begin until after two conversations between G-d and Abraham. The passage opens, "G-d tested Abraham," yet no test follows, just G-d's address to Abraham (to which Abraham replies "Here I am"), and then G-d's gradual identification of the son whom Abraham is to "take." Only retrospectively, only after learning of G-d's ultimate command to kill Isaac, could one read any tension or test back into these preliminary conversations. When they happen, they do not seem to constitute any test. Why, then, is the entire passage, including these two conversations, called a test?
I would answer: Whenever G-d speaks to a human being (". . . and He said, 'Abraham'"), even if G-d articulates nothing but the person's own name, it is a test. Nay, a supreme test.
By itself, the Divine address to humanity elevates human existence. Even if that address has no content except the person's name, the person is transformed. The sheer breakthrough — G-d's communication with man — changes him forever. Life under the gaze of G-d is life under the scrutiny of ethics and morality and spirituality, of challenge and pressure to live up to the holiness that G-d's presence entails. Abraham's test began with G-d's address to him, for under the gaze of G-d a person cannot kill or harm or cheat. Without G-d, there is only rapaciousness and cruelty. Without G-d, there is only Stalin's "the death of one person is a tragedy, the death of of one million people is a statistic."
The last chapter of this week's Torah portion, "the binding of Isaac," speaks to every Jew and, for that matter, to every person who accepts Hebrew Scripture. We are all tested each day; G-d addresses each one of us in our own say, continually. Not to mention, each command in the Torah is a direct address to each Jew.
No address or command from G-d is to be routine; each reveals us standing on the edge over the abyss — the sheer inhumanity that is our lot if we do not hear the address of G-d. Each word of G-d, even if only — or perhaps especially — our own name, is a challenge by G-d to rise to a greater spiritual height.
Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Rabbi Hillel Goldberg is executive editor of the Intermountain Jewish News. To comment, please click here.
© 2003, Rabbi Hillel Goldberg
|
