 |
|
April 9, 2014
Samuel G. Freedman: A resolution 70 years later for a father's unsettling legacy of ashes from Dachau
Jessica Ivins: A resolution 70 years later for a father's unsettling legacy of ashes from Dachau
Matthew Mientka: How Beans, Peas, And Chickpeas Cleanse Bad Cholesterol and Lowers Risk of Heart Disease
April 8, 2014
Dana Dovey: Coffee Drinkers Rejoice! Your Cup Of Joe Can Prevent Death From Liver Disease
Chris Weller: Electric 'Thinking Cap' Puts Your Brain Power Into High Gear
April 4, 2014
Amy Peterson: A life of love: How to build lasting relationships with your children
John Ericson: Older Women: Save Your Heart, Prevent Stroke Don't Drink Diet
John Ericson: Why 50 million Americans will still have spring allergies after taking meds
Sarah Boesveld: Teacher keeps promise to mail thousands of former students letters written by their past selves
April 2, 2014
Dan Barry: Should South Carolina Jews be forced to maintain this chimney built by Germans serving the Nazis?
Frank Clayton: Get happy: 20 scientifically proven happiness activities
Susan Scutti: It's Genetic! Obesity and the 'Carb Breakdown' Gene
|
| |
Jewish World Review
March 4, 2009 / 8 Adar 5769
Sweden's government health care
By
Walter Williams
| 
|
|
|
|
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com |
Government health care advocates used to sing the praises of Britain's
National Health Service (NHS). That's until its poor delivery of health
care services became known. A recent study by David Green and Laura
Casper, "Delay, Denial and Dilution," written for the London-based
Institute of Economic Affairs, concludes that the NHS health care
services are just about the worst in the developed world. The head of
the World Health Organization calculated that Britain has as many as
25,000 unnecessary cancer deaths a year because of under-provision of
care. Twelve percent of specialists surveyed admitted refusing kidney
dialysis to patients suffering from kidney failure because of limits on
cash. Waiting lists for medical treatment have become so long that there
are now "waiting lists" for the waiting list.
Government health care advocates sing the praises of Canada's
single-payer system. Canada's government system isn't that different
from Britain's. For example, after a Canadian has been referred to a
specialist, the waiting list for gynecological surgery is four to 12
weeks, cataract removal 12 to 18 weeks, tonsillectomy three to 36 weeks
and neurosurgery five to 30 weeks. Toronto-area hospitals, concerned
about lawsuits, ask patients to sign a legal release accepting that
while delays in treatment may jeopardize their health, they nevertheless
hold the hospital blameless. Canadians have an option Britainers don't:
close proximity of American hospitals. In fact, the Canadian government
spends over $1 billion each year for Canadians to receive medical
treatment in our country. I wonder how much money the U.S. government
spends for Americans to be treated in Canada.
"OK, Williams," you say, "Sweden is the world's socialist wonder." Sven
R. Larson tells about some of Sweden's problems in "Lesson from Sweden's
Universal Health System: Tales from the Health-care Crypt," published in
the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons (Spring 2008). Mr. D., a
Gothenburg multiple sclerosis patient, was prescribed a new drug. His
doctor's request was denied because the drug was 33 percent more
expensive than the older medicine. Mr. D. offered to pay for the
medicine himself but was prevented from doing so. The bureaucrats said
it would set a bad precedent and lead to unequal access to medicine.
Malmo, with its 280,000 residents, is Sweden's third-largest city. To
see a physician, a patient must go to one of two local clinics before
they can see a specialist. The clinics have security guards to keep
patients from getting unruly as they wait hours to see a doctor. The
guards also prevent new patients from entering the clinic when the
waiting room is considered full. Uppsala, a city with 200,000 people,
has only one specialist in mammography. Sweden's National Cancer
Foundation reports that in a few years most Swedish women will not have
access to mammography.
Dr. Olle Stendahl, a professor of medicine at Linkoping University,
pointed out a side effect of government-run medicine: its impact on
innovation. He said, "In our budget-government health care there is no
room for curious, young physicians and other professionals to challenge
established views. New knowledge is not attractive but typically
considered a problem (that brings) increased costs and disturbances in
today's slimmed-down health care."
These are just a few of the problems of Sweden's single-payer
government-run health care system. I wonder how many Americans would
like a system that would, as in the case of Mr. D. of Gothenburg,
prohibit private purchase of your own medicine if the government refused
paying. We have problems in our health care system but most of them are
a result of too much government. Over 50 percent of health care
expenditures in our country are made by government. Government health
care advocates might say that they will avoid the horrors of other
government-run systems. Don't believe them.
The American Association of Physicians and Surgeons, who published Sven
Larson's paper, is a group of liberty-oriented doctors and health care
practitioners who haven't sold their members down the socialist river as
have other medical associations. They deserve our thanks for being a
major player in the '90s defeat of "Hillary care."
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Walter Williams Archives
© 2006, Creators Syndicate.
|
|
Columnists
Toons
Lifestyles
|
