Since U.S. troops withdrew from Iraq's cities, two
months have passed, and so has the illusion that Iraq is smoothly
transitioning to a normality free of sectarian violence. Recently, Gen.
Ray Odierno, commander of U.S. troops there, "blanched" when asked if the
war is "functionally over." According to The Washington Post's Greg Jaffe,
"There are still civilians being killed in Iraq. We still have people
that are attempting to attack the new Iraqi order and the move towards
democracy and a more open economy. So we still have some work to do."
No, wedon't, even if, as Jaffe reports, the
presence of 130,000 U.S. troops "serves as a check on Iraqi military and
political leaders' baser and more sectarian instincts." After almost six
and a half years, and 4,327 American dead and 31,483 wounded, with a war
spiraling downward in Afghanistan, it would be indefensible for the U.S.
military overextended and in need of materiel repair and mental
recuperation to loiter in Iraq to improve the instincts of corrupt
elites. If there is worse use of the U.S. military than "nation-building,"
it is adult supervision and behavior modification of other peoples'
|FREE SUBSCRIPTION TO INFLUENTIAL NEWSLETTER|
Every weekday NewsAndOpinion.com publishes what many in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". HUNDREDS of columnists and cartoonists regularly appear. Sign up for the daily update. It's free. Just click here.
More than 725 Iraqis have been killed by terrorism since the June 30
pullback of U.S. forces from the cities. All U.S. combat units are to be
withdrawn from the country within a year. Up to 50,000 can remain as
"advisers" to an Iraqi government that is ostentatious about its belief
that the presence of U.S. forces is superfluous and obnoxious.
The advisers are to leave by the end of 2011, by which time the final
two years of the U.S. military presence will have achieved … what?
Already that presence is irrelevant to the rising chaos, which the Iraqi
government can neither contain nor refrain from participating in: Security
forces seem to have been involved in the recent robbery of a state-run
bank in central Baghdad.
Washington Post columnist David Ignatius correctly argues that
"without the backstop of U.S. support," Iraq is "desperately vulnerable"
to Iranian pressure. He also reports, however, that an Iraqi intelligence
official says Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's links with Iran are so
close that he "uses an Iranian jet with an Iranian crew for his official
travel." Whenever U.S. forces leave, Iran will still be Iraq's neighbor.
Kenneth Pollack of the Brookings Institution, writing in The National
Interest, notes that although rising Iraqi nationalism might help "heal
the rifts between Sunni and Shia," it also might exacerbate relations with
the Kurdish semi-state in northern Iraq, where control of much oil and the
city of Kirkuk is being contested.
The militia parties that ruled Iraq from 2003 to 2007 remain, Pollack
says, the major political parties, although mostly without militias. They
"still bribe and extort," "assassinate and kidnap," "steal and vandalize"
and try to prevent the emergence of new political parties that are "more
secular, more democratic, more representative, less corrupt and less
violent." If they succeed and "America is forced out," Pollack says, "the
glimmers of democracy will fade and Iraq will be lost again." But if
democracy is still just a glimmer that will be extinguished by the
withdrawal of a protective U.S. presence, its extinction can perhaps be
delayed for two more years but cannot be prevented.
The 2008 U.S.-Iraq security agreement must be submitted to a
referendum by the Iraqi people. If they reject it, U.S. forces must leave
the country in a year. Pollack believes that if Maliki pushes to hold the
referendum in January, coinciding with the national elections, the
agreement will become the campaign issue and will
indicate that Maliki wants U.S. forces removed in order to enlarge his
freedom of action. The United States should treat this as a Dirty Harry
Moment: Make our day.
Many scholars believe, Pollack says, that nations which suffer civil
wars as large as Iraq's was between 2004 and 2006 have "a terrifyingly
high rate of recidivism." Two more years of U.S. military presence cannot
control whether that is in Iraq's future. Some people believe the war in
Iraq was not only "won" but vindicated by the success of the 2007 U.S.
troop surge. Yet as Iraqi violence is resurgent, the logic of triumphalism
If, in spite of contrary evidence, the U.S. surge permanently
dampened sectarian violence, all U.S. forces can come
home sooner than the end of 2011. If, however, the surge did not so
succeed, U.S. forces must come home sooner.