
 |
|
Nov. 23, 2009
JWisdom.com: Actually, it really is all about you with Rabbi Lawrence Hajioff
Nov. 20, 2009
Nov. 19, 2009
Jonathan Tobin: ADL Crosses the Line with Report Bashing Obama Critics
Nov. 18, 2009
JWisdom.com: The (Jewish) Dating Game
with Rabbi Lawrence Hajioff (8 minutes)
Nov. 17, 2009
Steven Emerson: How Does the 4th Amendment Impact Terror Finance Investigations?
JWisdom.com: If Frank Sinatra married Edith Piaf
with Rabbi Y.Y. Rubinstein (2 minutes) Life lessons from what would be regarded as the most inappropriate lyrics ever sung
Nov. 16, 2009
JWisdom.com: Deconstructing faith
with Rabbi Warren Goldstein (9 minutes)
Nov. 13, 2009
JWisdom.com Sarah's subjective reality
with Rabbi Sroy Levitansky ( 6 minutes)
Nov. 12, 2009
JWisdom.com Does God get tired?
with Rabbi Harvey Belovski ( 5 minutes)
Nov. 11, 2009
JWisdom.com Marriages are not made in Heaven
with Rabbi Lawrence Hajioff (VERY fast 15 minutes)
Nov. 10, 2009
Michael Doyle: Author of book exposing CAIR ordered to remove supporting documents from Web
JWisdom.com If the creation so loudly shouts the existence of the Creator, why aren't more people believers? with Rabbi Naftali Brawer (9 minutes)
Nov. 9, 2009
Mark Steyn: Shooter exposes hole
in U.S. terror strategy
JWisdom.com It's never too late to
have a happy childhood with Sarah Chana Radcliffe (5 minutes)
Nov. 6, 2009
JWisdom.com Zero to 1/60th: How
to Empower An Hour with Gavriel Aryeh Sande (7 minutes)
Nov. 5, 2009
JWisdom.com Hidden Hints: Unlocking
Faith & Prayer with Rabbi Jay Yaacov Schwartz (10 minutes)
Nov. 4, 2009
JWisdom.com When God played peacemaker
With Rabbi Sroy Levitansky (5 minutes)
Nov. 3, 2009
JWisdom.com Are you are closet idolater?
With Sara Yoheved Rigler (10 minutes)
Nov. 2, 2009
JWisdom.com Abraham's Strange Change
With Rabbi Yitzchok Fingerer (5 minutes)
|
| |
Jewish World Review
May 28, 2009
/ 5 Sivan 5769
The ACLU Talks Too Much
By
Bob Tyrrell
| 
|
|
|
|
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com |
It was my old friend and mentor, Luigi Barzini,
who asseverated, "Americans talk too much." He was sitting in the elegant
library of his home in Rome. The year was 1978, though I cannot recall the
contemporary controversy that aroused him. Luigi's point was that we were
wrangling again fortissimo con brio , and he thought
our jabbering was obscuring careful thought again. He was a great friend of
America. He had been partly educated here. He wrote in both Italian and
superb English. In fact, at the time, he was finishing one of his many fine
books, "The Europeans." It contains a friendly chapter on the USA full of
shrewd insights. He believed we often argued garrulously about things that
were not worth arguing about.
A case is about to be tried in the Supreme Court that fits
Luigi's diagnosis. The American Civil Liberties Union filed a suit in 2001
demanding that a 7-foot cross erected in the California desert in 1934
commemorating sacrifices endured by our troops in World War I be taken down.
At some point after 1934, the land on which the cross was erected became
federally protected, and thus, the cross became a fit issue for the ACLU's
squalling about the separation of church and state. The creation of this
World War I monument was get this! part of a 1930s medical program to
help World War I veterans recover from shell shock. Physicians treating them
thought that their work in the desert heat would be therapeutic. In 2004,
the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with the ACLU, but veterans
groups objected thus the case's journey to the Supreme Court.
Now, it would seem to me that the cross is a historic monument
that need not be subject to contemporary fashions in thought, to wit, the
fashion of hunting down religious symbols and eliminating them from
government property. The cross simply represents the feelings of service
members from a bygone era. There are religious symbols on public display
from the past elsewhere. For instance, there are religious symbols on the
Supreme Court building. If I recall, I have seen a carving in the court's
chamber of Moses receiving the Ten Commandments from God. There may even be
a picture of God up there. Viewing the 1934 cross today might give curious
Americans a sense of what our country was like back in those days, before
the ACLU was spreading good will around the country by harassing people of
faith.
Yet that is not the way the battle-axes at the ACLU see it. One
of its learned lawyers, Peter Eliasberg, told The Washington Times, "For us
to choose the principal symbol of one religion that says Jesus is the Son of
God and He is divine and say that is an appropriate way to reflect the
sacrifice of people who don't believe that . is excluding by its very
nature." Well, "we" did not choose the symbol. Veterans from what once was
called the Great War did, apparently with the consent of their physicians.
This is an interesting historic memorial that the ACLU would deny us.
Veterans groups that are opposing the removal of the cross
disagree with Eliasberg. Their members argue that the cross represents the
"Fallen Soldier Battle Cross." That is a rifle and crossed bayonet that is
driven into the ground to honor a fallen comrade. Will the ACLU oppose this,
too? Jim Sims, of the Military Order of the Purple Heart, told the Times the
controversy is "about thousands of veteran memorials and monuments around
the country. This is about the issue of honoring veterans."
It is trendy in our noisy public discourse to see "the right"
being accused of injecting religion into politics. Actually, very often "the
right" or, more specifically, "the Christian right" merely is
defending settled manifestations of religion that go back decades in our
history, occasionally centuries. As I see it, the ACLU would have us rewrite
American history, eliminating all references to God, the Bible and other
such artifacts. Of course, for people of faith, these artifacts are
reminders of faith. So maybe the ACLU could begin a campaign to disallow
people of faith from lapsing into prayer in front of such reminders.
Possibly the ACLU's next campaign will be to eliminate religious symbols
from public buildings, starting with the Supreme Court. As Luigi noticed,
some "americanos" are too disputatious.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Bob Tyrrell is editor in chief of The American Spectator. Comment by clicking here.
Archives
© 2008, Creators Syndicate
|
|

Arnold Ahlert
Mitch Albom
Michael Barone
Dave Barry
Tony Blankley
Andy Borowitz
David Broder
Stratfor Briefing
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Suzanne Fields
John Fund
Frank J. Gaffney
Lloyd Garver
Jonah Goldberg
Julia Gorin
Jonathan Gurwitz
Paul Greenberg
Lewis Grossberger
Victor Davis Hanson
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Laura Ingraham
Cheri Jacobus Jeff Jacoby
Paul Johnson
Jack Kelly
Ed Koch
Ch. Krauthammer
Michael Ledeen
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Kathryn Lopez
Rich Lowry
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Dick Morris
Bill O'Reilly
Jim Mullen
Clarence Page
Kathleen Parker
Dennis Prager
Wesley Pruden
Tom Purcell
Jonathan Rauch
Celia Rivenbark
Robert Robb
Cokie & Steve Roberts
Pat Sajak
Debra J. Saunders
Culture Shlock
Roger Simon
Michael Smerconish
Thomas Sowell
Mark Steyn
John Stossel
Cal Thomas
Bob Tyrrell
Diana West
Dave Weinbaum
George Will
Walter Williams
Byron York
Mort Zuckerman

Robert Arial
Chuck Asay
Baloo
Chip Bok
Dry Bones
Lisa Benson
John Branch
Gary Brookins
John Cole
J. D. Crowe
John Deering
Brian Duffy
Everything's Relative
Mallard Fillmore
Jake Fuller
Bob Gorrel
Joe Heller
David Hitch
Jerry Holber
Steve Kelley
Jeff Koterba
Dick Locher
Chan Lowe
Ranan R. Lurie
Jimmy Margulies
Rick McKee
Michael Ramirez
Kevin Siers
Jeff Stahler
Ed Stein
Danna Summers
John Trever
Gary Varvel
Kirk Walters

How 2
Lori Borgman
The Savvy Consumer
Elder matters
Fixit
Dr. Peter Gott
GET A JOB! by Marty Nemko
Richard Lederer
Tech Maven
Every Monday Matters
Nutrition Myths
Bookmark These
Bruce Williams
How Stuff Works
|