 |
|
February 10, 2012
Lisa M. Krieger: Man with defibrillator demands access to his own heart's information
David G. Savage: Why activists may not be in a hurry to have High Court rule on alternative marriage
February 9, 2012
Laura McMullen: 10 Least Expensive Public Schools for Out-of-State Students
Kimberly Palmer: How to actually enjoy -- relaxing, financially -- your vacation
February 8, 2012
Warren Richey: Why momentous Prop. 8 ruling might not satisfy gay-rights groups
Menachem Wecker: Though Controversial, LL.M.'s Can Lead to Specialized Legal Jobs
The Kosher Gourmet byDana Velden: Going to the bother of making soup? You know it better be good. This CREAM OF TOMATO SOUP certainly is! And it's a cinch to make, too (Includes techinques and serving secrets)
February 7, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.: Caught off-guard? President's Super Bowl interview with Matt Lauer gives those who need a reason not to vote for him, a darn good one
Suzanne Bohan: Leaping lizards! Tiny reptiles advancing robot design
February 6, 2012
Jonathan Tobin: Iran Threatens Israel With Destruction, But the New York Times Doesn't Hear It
Jeffrey Fleishman: In newly democratic Egypt, tens of democracy activists jailed, to stand trial; their groups are 'threatening the stability of the homeland'
Julie Deardorff : Researchers say antioxidants may not be that effective and could do more harm than good
Mark Clayton: How did Anonymous hackers eavesdrop on FBI and Scotland Yard?
February 3, 2012
Edmund Sanders : Israeli official says Iran is creating missile that could reach East Coast of US
Victoria Kim: Immigrant-smuggling ring used black drivers to avoid racial profiling
February 2, 2012
Jim Carney: Wrong number call may have saved her life
Reza Kahlili : Ex-CIA spy in Iran's Revolutionary Guard: What Obama doesn't grasp about striking deals with Tehran
Tina Susman: For woodchuck rescuer, every day is Groundhog Day
February 1, 2012
Brian Bennett: US officials see increasing threat of domestic attack from Iran
Emily Brandon: How to Take Advantage of New 401(k) Fee Disclosures
January 31, 2012
January 30, 2012
Paul Richter and Ramin Mostaghim: Misreading Teheran's limits -- deadly and economically devastating as they may be -- is a risk administration, Europe seem willing to take
Suzanne Bohan: Warning: Nap-deprived tots missing more than sleep, study finds
Meg Handley: Banks Revamping Rewards Programs to Woo Customers
January 27, 2012
Caroline B. Glick: Obama: Of course I intend to prevent a nuclear holocaust . . . in a few months
Yochonon Donn: In liberal New York City, fervently-Orthodox Jews may soon be getting a district to call their own
Jeannine Stein: An inflated ego and thinking you're 'all that' doesn't just make others sick of you, it can make you ill
Katy Hopkins: New budget rules may affect how much money you get for college
January 26, 2012
Ed Koch: To the New York Times, calling for the murder of Jews by those capable of having their incitement taken seriously isn't news
Jeannine Stein: Mental illness struck one in five U.S. adults in 2010: Report
January 25, 2012
Richard Simon: House passes two bills endorsing the use of religious symbols at military memorials
Fred Weir: Putin: Multiethnic Russia cannot survive as a US-style 'melting pot'; must find its own way
Susan Johnston: 5 Sneaky Coupon Strategies Consumers Should Watch Out For
January 24, 2012
Carol Clark: The price of your soul: How your brain decides whether to 'sell out'
Caroline B. Glick: America lost most in 'Arab Spring'. Sadly, many voters still don't grasp the extent
Warren Richey: Drug criminal scores win in GPS ruling from conservative-leaning high court
Erika Bolstad: Black conservatives gather to talk about gaining strength
January 23, 2012
Melissa Dribben: Jewish voters to play a key role in Florida's Republican primary
Jordan Rau: In quest to grow, Catholic hospital system will announce this morning its break from church
Ali Safi: U.S. envoy gives Taliban terms for peace talks
January 19, 2012
January 18, 2012
January 17, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney Jr.: No-kidding red lines: U.S. response to an Iranian nuke may be bluster, but Israel's won't be
David G. Savage: They sued their principals after slandering them online --- now the cases are headed to the Supreme Court
David Francis: Where to Invest in 2012: With stocks expected to rebound, opportunity abounds for investors
January 13, 2012
Ben Lynfield: Israeli lawmakers move to annex Jewish Judea, one museum at a time
Alexia Elejalde-Ruiz: Thriving through touch: Gentle massage helps older people with low mobility improve in mind and body
January 12, 2012
Warren Richey: Landmark Supreme Court ruling a 'resounding win' for religious groups
Warren Richey: Supreme Court says no to new rule on eyewitness testimony
John Fauber : Statins found to raise diabetes risk in postmenopausal women
Katy Hopkins : Consider This Before You Pay for an Online Degree
The Kosher Gourmet by Joseph Erdos: This mushroom and barley soup has an intense -- almost nutty -- flavor that mixes robust with Middle East. It has creaminess without cream
January 11, 2012
Shari Roan: Millions of atrial fibrillation sufferers at risk for devastating, but preventable, stroke
Tom Hussain: Pakistan -- recipient of more than $21 billion in civilian and military aid -- speeds pursuit of Iranian pipeline, defying US
David G. Savage: High court signals it won't be loosening TV's 'indecency' rules
Stephen Ceasar: Oklahoma's Islamic law amendment can't go into effect, court rules
January 10, 2012
Reza Kahlili: From an ex-CIA spy: US must exploit new split in Iran's Revolutionary Guard
Karen Kaplan: Study: Nicotine replacement products ineffective when used in real-life situations
January 9, 2012
Michael Doyle: Put through legal hell over dream home, couple fought back hard --- all the way to Supreme Court
|
| |
Jewish World Review
Dec. 4, 2003
/ 9 Kislev, 5764
A False Peace
By
Jonathan Tobin
The Geneva pact shows Israel's still treated as the 'Jew of the Nations'
http://www.jewishworldreview.com |
It is always difficult to speak out against anything that is labeled as
pro-peace. After all, who in their right minds is against peace?
Not the people of Israel, who have been assailed by war and terror every
moment of their state's short life, and who have endured the last three years of a
Palestinian terrorist war.
And not American friends of Israel, who have watched every effort for peace
fail because of the unwillingness of the Palestinians to halt their violent
ways and accept Israel's legitimacy.
But that's what supporters of the "Geneva Initiative," now officially called
the Geneva accord, which was presented in an extravaganza this week say about
its detractors. Stamped with the approval of none other than former President
Jimmy Carter, former South African political prisoner Nelson Mandela and the
nations of the European Union, the new accord is being acclaimed as an
enlightened alternative to a "hard-line" Israeli government and a Bush
administration "biased towards Israel."
They say that the terms agreed to by the failed Israeli politicians and their
partners from the Palestinian Authority are the only formula for peace, and
that Israel must accept them as the starting point for new negotiations.
According to the editorial page of The New York Times, Geneva is "the right way to
go" — and how the conflict "must end."
GETTING AROUND DEMOCRACY
The accord's authors and their cheerleaders in the international media are
also already labeling everyone who points out the shortcomings and the inherent
illegitimacy of this bizarre charade as "extremists" and foes of peace. But
the rhetoric of Geneva's advocates tells us a lot more about them than about
their critics. 
The main purpose here is an open attempt to circumvent Israeli democracy.
After all, those who claimed to represent the people of Israel at Geneva were
the same people who earlier this year asked Israelis to give them the power
to conduct the country's affairs.
In case you missed the results of those elections, here's an update: they
lost in a landslide, for the second time in two years. Indeed, the principle
Israeli architect of this affair, former Cabinet minister Yossi Beilin, couldn't
even get himself elected to the Knesset as a member of Israel's far-left Meretz
Party after being rejected by the members of mainstream left-wing Labor.
Beilin has as much right to represent Israel as Ralph Nader and Pat Buchanan
have to represent the United States. But more important than the pretensions
of Beilin is the international community's desire for "regime change" in
Israel.
This is the same group of world leaders and media outlets that have unfairly
denounced every instance of Israeli self-defense for decades, and that has
stood by silently as their vituperation helped fuel the fires of anti-Semitism in
Europe.
The foreign governments who paid for the Geneva extravaganza — Switzerland
and the European Union — are impatient with Israel's refusal to break under the
pressure of Palestinian terror. They don't like Prime Minister Ariel Sharon,
who despite his acceptance of a Palestinian state, refuses to divide Jerusalem
or lessen Israel's vigilance against Palestinian terrorism.
It must be pointed out that no other country in the world — not even the most
barbaric dictatorships, let alone a democratic country — is treated in this
manner. The national director of the Anti-Defamation League, Abraham Foxman,
put it succinctly when he told me that by singling out Israel in this manner,
the Geneva show winds up treating Israel as the "Jew of the nations." This
recourse to treating Israel as such a pariah that can be insulted at will can only
be understood in the context of a worldwide surge in anti-Semitism.
The tone and the content of the speeches at the Geneva ceremony told you all
you needed to know about it. From Carter and virtually every speaker, the
theme was the same: Israel's government, the presence of Jews in the territories
and the building of a security fence were spoken of as the only obstacles to
peace.
No one there criticized Yasser Arafat, who rejected peace terms that were
slightly less generous three years ago, and who launched a terrorist war instead.
Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak — no friend of Sharon, who ousted in
him a landslide — got to the heart of the matter when he termed Geneva "a
delusion" that was "rewarding terror."
He also had the bad manners to tell CNN that despite the declarations of
Beilin and Carter, the key issues of the right of the Palestinians to swamp Israel
with refugees and the Arab recognition of Israel as a Jewish state, which the
accord claimed to have solved, were, in fact, not resolved at Geneva.
But, having said all that, does the Geneva show really matter?
Unfortunately, the answer is "yes."
THE REAL OBSTACLE TO PEACE
The intentions of many of the Jewish supporters of this plan are undoubtedly
pure. They want peace for Israel, and they mistakenly imagine that Geneva will
help.
But the intentions of some of the other Geneva backers, like Carter and the
Europeans who have helped popularize Israel-bashing, are not as defensible.
They hope American Jews will assist them in their effort to subvert Israel's
democracy. And whether you like Sharon or not, that is a cause Americans should
reject as inherently wrong.
Geneva's proponents claim it might push Sharon to make peace. But that
wrongly places the responsibility for the lack of peace on Israel. Such thinking
shows they have learned nothing in the last 10 years, which saw Israel sign
several peace agreements that were, in turn, trashed by a Palestinian leadership
that never had any intention of living up to their terms.
It also doesn't matter whether you think the Geneva accord is either
equitable or compatible with Israel's survival. Foisting this faux treaty on Israel
allows Arafat to play his usual game of bait and switch. The Geneva concessions
will be seen as the starting point for future talks, which will inevitably
lead to the next round of Palestinians demands. Israel's failure to accede to
those will be seen as a new obstacle to peace. The end result, as with the Oslo
process, will inevitably be more bloodshed.
And that's the key problem. The fuss over this plan will lessen the pressure
on the real obstacles to peace: Arafat and his terrorist followers. As a
result, it will more likely retard the admittedly slim chances for peace, not
advance them.
That is why, despite the natural reluctance to oppose anything that calls
itself "peace," American supporters of Israel must resist this misguided
campaign.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Jonathan S. Tobin is executive editor of the Philadelphia Jewish Exponent.
Let him know what you think by clicking here. In June, Mr. Tobin won first places honors in the American
Jewish Press Association's Louis Rapaport Award for Excellence in Commentary as
well as the Philadelphia Press Association's Media Award for top weekly
columnist. Both competitions were for articles written in the year 2002.
Jonathan Tobin Archives
© 2003, Jonathan Tobin
|
