<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2 Final//EN">

<HTML> 
 
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Morton Kondracke</TITLE>
</HEAD>

<BODY bgcolor="#ffffff" link="#336600" vlink="#000000" alink="#ffff66">

<a name="top"></a>

<!-- ** include width and height tags for ALL images and border=0 if image is a link ** -->

<TABLE BORDER="0" CELLPADDING="0" CELLSPACING="0" width=468>
<TR><TD>
<!--#include virtual="/t-ssi/jwrgad.asp" -->
<center><FONT SIZE="2" face = "Helvetica, Arial"><B>Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve</B>
</font></center>
</td></tr></table>


<TABLE BORDER="0" CELLPADDING="0" CELLSPACING="0" WIDTH="440">



<TR> 
<TD>
<!-- hed image -->
<IMG SRC="../images/insight_hed.gif" align=center width=440 height=101>
</td></tr>


<TR>
<TD>
<FONT FACE="Arial, Helvetica" SIZE=1><A HREF="http://www.jewishworldreview.com" target="_parent">Jewish World Review</A> April 24, 2002 / 13 Iyar, 5762</FONT>

<P>  
<!-- author -->
<B><i>Morton Kondracke</I></B>
<!-- author -->

<P>

<!-- *** begin right sidebar *** -->
<TABLE BORDER="0" CELLPADDING="0" CELLSPACING="0" align=right hspace=0>
<TR>
<TD rowspan=3 width=15 nowrap></td>

<TD align=center>
<!-- head shot here -->
<IMG SRC="../cols2/kondracke.jpg" ALT="Kondracke" WIDTH="80" HEIGHT="90" BORDER="1" HSPACE="0" VSPACE="0">
<!-- </td> must be on same line as image with no hard return to insure proper centering -->
<TR><TD height=10 nowrap></td></tr>
<TR><TD align=center>
<TABLE BORDER="1" CELLPADDING="10" CELLSPACING="0">
<TR>
<TD bgcolor="#003399"><FONT color="#ccffff">JWR's Pundits</FONT></td></tr>
<TR>
<td bgcolor="#ffffcc"><FONT SIZE=1 FACE="Helvetica, Arial" color="#000000">
<!-- begin other columnists -->
<A HREF="../toons/toon1.asp" target="content">World Editorial<BR>Cartoon Showcase</A><BR>
<A HREF="../strips/mallard/2000/mallard1.asp" target="content"> Mallard Fillmore<BR><BR>
<A HREF="../michael/barone1.asp" target="content">Michael Barone</A><BR>
<A HREF="../cols/charen1.asp" target="content">Mona Charen</A><BR>
<A HREF="../cols/chavez1.asp" target="content">Linda Chavez</A><BR>
<A HREF="../cols/coulter1.asp" target="content">Ann Coulter</A><BR>
<A HREF="../cols/crosby1.asp" target="content">Greg Crosby</A><BR>
<A HREF="../cols/elder1.asp" target="content">Larry Elder</A><BR>
<A HREF="../cols/feder1.asp" target="content">Don Feder</A><BR>
<A HREF="../cols/fields1.asp" target="content">Suzanne Fields</A><BR>
<A HREF="../cols/greenberg1.asp" target="content">Paul Greenberg</A><BR>
<A HREF="../bob/greene1.asp" target="content">Bob Greene</A><BR>
<A HREF="../cols/hart1.asp" target="content">Betsy Hart</A><BR>
<A HREF="../cols/hentoff1.asp" target="content">Nat Hentoff</A><BR>
<A HREF="../cols/horowitz1.asp" target="content">David Horowitz</A><BR>
<A HREF="../cols/jennings1.asp" target="content">Marianne Jennings</A><BR>
<A HREF="../michael/kelly1.asp" target="content">Michael Kelly</A><BR>
<A HREF="../cols/kondracke1.asp" target="content">Mort Kondracke</A><BR>
<A HREF="../cols/krauthammer1.asp" target="content">Ch. Krauthammer</A><BR>
<A HREF="../cols/kudlow1.asp" target="content">Lawrence Kudlow</A><BR>
<A HREF="../dr/laura1.asp" target="content">Dr. Laura</A><BR>
<A HREF="../cols/leo1.asp" target="content">John Leo</A><BR>
<A HREF="../david/limbaugh1.asp" target="content">David Limbaugh</A><BR>
<A HREF="../michelle/malkin1.asp" target="content">Michelle Malkin </A><BR>
<A HREF="../cols/matthews1.asp" target="content">Chris Matthews</A><BR>
<A HREF="../cols/medved1.asp" target="content">Michael Medved</A><BR>
<A HREF="../cols/mugger1.asp" target="content">MUGGER</A> <BR>
<A HREF="../kathleen/parker1.asp" target="content">Kathleen Parker </A><BR>
<A HREF="../cols/pruden1.asp" target="content">Wes Pruden</A><BR>
<A HREF="../sam/schulman1.asp" target="content">Sam Schulman</A><BR>
<A HREF="../cols/shlaes1.asp" target="content">Amity Shlaes</A><BR>
<A HREF="../tony/snow1.asp" target="content">Tony Snow</A><BR>
<A HREF="../cols/sowell1.asp" target="content">Thomas Sowell</A><BR>
<A HREF="../cols/thomas1.asp" target="content">Cal Thomas</A><BR>
<A HREF="../cols/tobin1.asp" target="content">Jonathan S. Tobin</A><BR>
<A HREF="../cols/wattenberg1.asp" target="content">Ben Wattenberg</A><BR>
<A HREF="../cols/will1.asp" target="content">George Will</A><BR>
<A HREF="../cols/bruce1.asp" target="content">Bruce Williams</A><BR>
<A HREF="../cols/williams1.asp" target="content">Walter Williams</A><BR>
<A HREF="../mort/zuckerman1.asp" target="content">Mort Zuckerman</A><BR><BR>
<A HREF="../cols/consumer1.asp" target="content">Consumer Reports</A><BR>
</font></td></tr></table><BR>
<a href="http://www.jewishworldreview.com/index.php3#insight" target="_top"><img src="http://www.jewishworldreview.com/images/for_even_more.gif" alt="" width=99 height=68 border=0></a>
</center>
</td></tr>
</TABLE> 
<!-- *** end right sidebar *** -->



<!-- title -->
<FONT SIZE="5" COLOR="#0689A0"><B>

Partial fixes won't solve crisis in health
   care costs 


</b></font>
<!-- title -->


<P><BR>

<!-- attribution -->
<FONT FACE="Helvetica, Arial" SIZE=3 COLOR="3366FF"><B>http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com |</B></FONT>    
<!-- ATTRIBUTION -->
   Surging health costs and insurance premiums -
   and increases in the number of uninsured Americans sure to follow -
   cry out for Washington politicians to begin thinking comprehensively
   about America's impending health care crisis.
<P><P>
   One of these days, they will - ideally, as part of the 2004 election
   campaign. But for now, they are taking only piecemeal whacks at
   the problem.
<P><P>
   Sometimes incrementalism in Washington produces good results,
   such as creation of the State Children's Health Insurance Program
   that widened Medicaid benefits for lower-income families.
<P><P>
   But often it simply results in efforts by one group in the health care
   industry - say, doctors or hospitals - to get the upper hand over
   another, such as pharmaceutical or insurance companies.
<P><P>
   A huge, multibillion-dollar battle of that type is set to surface in
   earnest this week when the Senate Commerce, Science and
   Transportation Committee begins hearings on legislation to limit
   current patent protections for drug companies.
<P><P>
   The bill's sponsors, Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Charles
   Schumer (D-N.Y.), say that their bill would hasten the arrival of
   generic drugs to market and "achieve monumental savings for
   seniors and families ... upwards of $71 billion over the next 10
   years." 
<P><P>
   On the other side, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of
   America argues that further reductions in already-falling profits of
   brand-name drug companies will prevent development of new
   medicines to cure diseases.
<P><P>
   McCain and Schumer - who have an unlikely collection of liberal
   consumer groups, insurance companies, unions, HMOs and auto
   companies in their corner - contend, correctly, that generic drugs
   cost considerably less than brand-name drugs.
<P><P>
   But PhRMA, the pharmaceutical lobby, argues - also correctly - that
   generic companies don't have to risk hundreds of millions of dollars
   developing and testing new drugs, only one-tenth of which ever
   make it to market.
<P><P>
   To bolster its case, PhRMA is about to release a national survey of
   400 physicians conducted by Republican pollster Whit Ayres
   showing that two-thirds of those surveyed think that weakening
   patent protections for new prescription drugs will hurt research and
   innovation.
<P><P>
   More than 85 percent of the doctors credit new prescription drugs
   with reducing the need for surgery and shortening hospital stays,
   which tend to reduce overall health-care costs.
<P><P>
   Part of the battle between the brand-name industry and the
   generics is legal, revolving around the 1984 Hatch-Waxman Act.
   That law gives generic companies access to brand companies' trade
   secrets and allows them to get products ready to market the
   moment a brand's patent expires, usually after 12 years.
<P><P>
   The law also extends the patent for an additional 30 months if the
   brand-drug company sues a generic. McCain and Schumer contend
   that the brand-name companies regularly game the system to
   extend patent protection and that they aim to restore the intent of
   the 1984 law.
<P><P>
   Which side is right is a murky matter. But it is true that rising
   outlays for drugs is the largest single contributor to exploding
   health-care costs. 
<P><P>
   But according to the Kaiser Family Foundation, the most important
   reason for rising drug expenditures is increased usage and
   ever-newer products, not price increases for individual drugs.
<P><P>
   There's clearly a balance needed between saving money on drugs
   and saving lives. What's also clear is that drug outlays are just part
   of a systemwide cost crisis in health care.
<P><P>
   The crisis was dramatized last week by the decision of the 1.2
   million-member California Public Employees Retirement System to
   raise premiums by an astonishing 25 percent, forecasting an even
   bigger increase next year.
<P><P>
   CalPERS is the second-largest buyer of health insurance in the
   nation after the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program, whose
   own premiums are going up 14 percent this year. 
<P><P>
   Such massive premium increases will be duplicated for employers all
   across the country - and will lead some to decrease coverage or
   drop it, swelling the ranks of the uninsured above 40 million. <P><P>

   Even CalPERS, which theoretically has huge bargaining power with
   health insurers and providers, has been unable to hold down costs.
   Most employers lack that power.
<P><P>
   So CalPERS has joined the National Coalition on Health Care in
   urging a new comprehensive look at the health crisis - the first
   since the ill-fated 1993 Clinton health care plan. The group
   comprises business, labor, consumer and religious groups, and
   large-state pension plans.
<P><P>
   President Henry Simmons says the group has no plan of its own,
   but that debate should start over three basic models. One is "play
   or pay," in which employers continue to provide most insurance
   coverage and would receive government help if they can't do so.
<P><P>
   A second, favored by liberals during the 1993 debate, is a
   single-payer system in which all citizens would get their health
   insurance from Medicare or another government program. 
<P><P>
   The third, proposed by some Republicans, would impose an
   individual requirement on all citizens to have health insurance and
   offer government subsidies to those who can't afford it.
<P><P>
   Democratic presidential contenders need to be heard on this issue
   soon, and they should pressure President Bush to be heard, too.


<IMG src="http://www.jewishworldreview.com/weeglobe.GIF" align="texttop" width=21 height=18>
</nobr>



<P>
<P><BR>



<P>





<P>

<P>
<P>
<P><BR>
 <FONT COLOR="#557799" FACE="Times New Roman" SIZE="4">

JWR contributor  Morton Kondracke is executive editor of Roll Call, the newspaper of Capitol Hill. Send your comments by clicking <A HREF="mailto:schmooze@jewishworldreview.com?subject=Mort Kondracke"> here.</A> </FONT></FONT>
</FONT></FONT>




<P>



 

<P>
<!-- previous columns by author -->
<P><P>

<!-- previous columns by author -->
 


<P>
<!-- copyright -->
<CENTER><FONT SIZE=1><I>&copy; 2001, NEA</I></FONT></CENTER>

</td></tr>
</TABLE>

</BODY>
</HTML>