Sept. 8, 2010 Rabbi Dov Fischer: iPods and why our prayers aren't answered Caroline B. Glick: What Glenn Beck can teach Israel Sept. 7, 2010 Rabbi Dr. Akiva Tatz: Beginnings: Why Rosh Hashana can affect the entire year Jeff Jacoby: Victims on the road to 'peace' Sept. 3, 2010 Rivy Poupko Kletenik: How to beat those down-home High Holiday blues Caroline B. Glick: The new Netanyahu? Mona Charen : Why These Talks Are Doomed Ground Zero Mosque Investor Was Terror Contributor (INVESTIGATIVE VIDEO) Sept. 2, 2010 John Rosemond: What do today's children seriously lack that children in the 1950s and before enjoyed in abundance? Evan Gahr: Seems Bloomberg truly CAIRs Thomas H. Maugh II: Diabetes drug found to reduce cancer risk Sept. 1, 2010 Rabbi Yonason Goldson: Fed Up! Michael B. Oren: Reason for optimism in Mideast talks Nat Hentoff: What hath the Ground Zero imam wrought? August 31, 2010 Mark Johnson: Scientists unveil new step in less-controversial stem-cell efforts Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.: Not a Muslim, but there's certainly legitimate room for concern over Obama's recent repeated actions August 30, 2010 The Jewish Ethicist by Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir: Bogus Job Interview Peter J. Sampson and Jean Rimbach: Tenants don't see imam as 'healer' Andrew Silow-Carroll: Fly the friendly skies --- or go to Israel August 27, 2010 David Hazony: The Mystery of Goodness Caroline B. Glick: Accepting the unacceptable August 26, 2010 John Rosemond: ‘Fixing’ Son's Shyness George Will: The Mideast mirage Paul Greenberg: Rare Sighting: Common Sense from the Bench August 25, 2010 Ariella Marcus: New prayer book uplifts as it enlightens Nat Hentoff: Am I also a bigot? Pols clueless on Ground Zero mosque Sarah Tully: Muslim employee is taken off Disney's schedule after deciding she no longer wants to wear uniform August 24, 2010 Steven Emerson: A 'moderate Muslim' exposed Cal Thomas: Pointless Talks Wesley Pruden: The 'Zionist plot' to build a mosque August 23, 2010 The Jewish Ethicist by Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir : Reclaiming what's yours through deception George Will: The 'two-state' delusion August 20, 2010 Rabbi Dov Fischer on his divorce and responsibility Caroline B. Glick: Dusk in Iraq August 19, 2010 Jeff Jacoby: The 'disengagement' disaster, five years on George Will: Skip the lectures on Israel's 'risks for peace' Matt Flegenheimer: Hypercompetitive overachievers bet on their own academic success August 18, 2010 Suzanne Fields: The New Dance on a Pinhead Richard Z. Chesnoff: A Film Unfinished: The Warsaw Ghetto As Seen Through Nazi Eyes Lee Margulies: Dr. Laura to leave radio show amid controversy (INCLUDES VIDEO) August 17, 2010 Dennis Prager: Same-Sex Marriage and the Insignificance of Men and Women Caroline B. Glick: Standing on a landmine Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.: Obama's 'Teachable' Shariah Moment August 16, 2010 Arnold Ahlert: You've Lost America, Mr. President George Will: Israel will not be a 'perfect victim' August 13, 2010 Rabbi Abraham J. Twerski: What does 'doing the right thing' entail? Caroline B. Glick: Guide to the Perplexed Jon Stewart: Charlie Rangel's War (VIDEO!) August 12, 2010 George Will: Israel's anti-Obama Larry Elder: Is Obama Winning the Hearts and Minds of the Arab and Muslim World? August 11, 2010 Rabbi Hillel Goldberg: How to talk to a neo-Nazi (POWERFUL!) Rene Stutzman: Muslim-turned-'infidel', now 18, is ready to begin life anew August 10, 2010 The Jewish Ethicist by Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir: Paid volunteer employee? Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.: Coming to grips with shariah

Jewish World Review May 30, 2008 / 25 Iyar 5768 Picking Judges By Linda Chavez http://www.JewishWorldReview.com | If you ask Americans what issues matter most to them in choosing a president, the candidate's judicial philosophy is not likely to make it into the top 10. But a president's power to nominate judges is, in fact, one of his most powerful tools — and often leaves a legacy that lasts far longer than any policy initiative. President Dwight Eisenhower was no liberal activist, but his appointment of Earl Warren as chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court dramatically shifted the nation leftward for decades on everything from criminal justice to separation of church and state to legislative reapportionment. Similarly, President Ronald Reagan was far more successful in reshaping the courts than in reducing the size of government. So it's important to know how each of the current candidates will go about picking judges when one of them becomes president. Both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are graduates of Ivy League law schools, Harvard and Yale respectively, and Obama taught constitutional law for a decade. Both approach the Constitution as a "living document," which they believe must constantly be interpreted anew depending on changing circumstances, mores, and values. The literal meaning of the words themselves are no more important in their eyes than the judge's interpretation of what is right and just. Thus, the 14th Amendment's guarantee of equal protection under the law without regard to race or color can be interpreted to permit discrimination against whites if it benefits blacks or Hispanics because, as a group, the latter have faced discrimination in the past and remain, on average, economically disadvantaged. Given this philosophy it's no wonder that Barack Obama set out his criteria for picking judges this way. "We need somebody who's got the heart … the empathy to recognize what it's like to be a young teenage mom, the empathy to understand what it's like to be poor or African-American or gay or disabled or old. And that's going to be the criteria by which I'm going to be selecting my judges." When Obama voted against Justice Samuel Alito's nomination to the Supreme Court, he said it was because Alito's record showed "extraordinarily consistent support for the powerful against the powerless." In other words, a judge's role should be to decide which party should prevail on the basis of some abstract notion of fairness. Now, this might strike some people as a good thing — though I can't for the life of me figure out why anyone should have to go to law school or have any familiarity with legal principles and precedents in order to become a judge if compassion is the chief criterion on which cases should be decided. Hillary Clinton's list was a little more substantive than Obama's. She told attendees to a 2007 Planned Parenthood convention that she would pick judges who "understand the role of precedent," by which she meant Roe v. Wade — though, apparently, no decision after it that rolled back an unlimited right to abortion. But she also threw in the phrase "well-qualified judges," which, at least, acknowledged that she would require something more than a kind heart in making her selections. Ironically, the only candidate whose primary concern is the law is the one candidate who isn't a lawyer: John McCain. He says he wants "jurists of the highest caliber, who know their own minds, and know the law, and know the difference." Perhaps it takes the humility of one who hasn't gone to law school to hold the law in such high esteem. More likely, it's respect for the democratic process by which the people choose lawmakers. In McCain's view, it's the role of the Legislature — made up of the people's elected representatives — to write laws. If the people don't like the laws their representatives make, they can pick new legislators, but neither the people nor legislators should rely on judges to rewrite those laws for them. It's impossible to predict a future president's judicial picks, but it's an almost certain bet that a President Obama (or Clinton) would choose judges who share their expansive view of judicial power while a President McCain would choose more humble judges who understand the limits of that power. What remains is for the voters to decide how much power they are willing to turn over to unelected men and women with lifetime tenure — and pick their president accordingly. Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here. JWR contributor Linda Chavez is President of the Center for Equal Opportunity. Her latest book is "Betrayal: How Union Bosses Shake Down Their Members and Corrupt American Politics". (Click HERE to purchase. Sales help fund JWR.) Linda Chavez Archives © 2006, Creators Syndicate

Arnold Ahlert  Mitch Albom  Barbara Amiel  Michael Barone  Tony Blankley  Andy Borowitz  David Broder  Stratfor Briefing  Mona Charen  Linda Chavez  Richard Z. Chesnoff  Ann Coulter  Greg Crosby  Alan Douglas  Larry Elder  Suzanne Fields  John Fund  Frank J. Gaffney  Lloyd Garver  Michael Gerson  Jonah Goldberg  Julia Gorin  Jonathan Gurwitz  Paul Greenberg  Lewis Grossberger  Victor Davis Hanson  Betsy Hart  Ron Hart  Nat Hentoff  Marybeth Hicks  David Horowitz  Cheri Jacobus  Jeff Jacoby  Paul Johnson  Jack Kelly  Ed Koch  Ch. Krauthammer  Michael Ledeen  John Leo  David Limbaugh  Kathryn Lopez  Rich Lowry  Michelle Malkin  Jackie Mason  Dick Morris  Jim Mullen  Bill O'Reilly  Kathleen Parker  Mark Patinkin  Dennis Prager  Wesley Pruden  Tom Purcell  Jonathan Rauch  Robert Robb  Cokie & Steve Roberts  Heather Robinson  Pat Sajak  Debra J. Saunders  Culture Shlock  Michael Smerconish  Thomas Sowell  Mark Steyn  John Stossel  Cal Thomas  Bob Tyrrell  Diana West  Dave Weinbaum  George Will  Walter Williams  Byron York  Mort Zuckerman  Robert Arial  Chuck Asay  Baloo  Chip Bok  Dry Bones   Lisa Benson  John Branch  Gary Brookins  John Cole  J. D. Crowe  John Deering  Brian Duffy  Everything's Relative  Mallard Fillmore  Jake Fuller  Bob Gorrel  Joe Heller  David Hitch  Jerry Holber  Steve Kelley  Jeff Koterba  Dick Locher  Chan Lowe  Ranan R. Lurie  Jimmy Margulies  Rick McKee  Michael Ramirez  Kevin Siers  Jeff Stahler  Ed Stein  Danna Summers  John Trever  Gary Varvel  Kirk Walters  Lori Borgman  Fixit  Dr. Peter Gott  GET A JOB! by Marty Nemko  Richard Lederer  Tech Maven  Every Monday Matters  Nutrition Myths  Bookmark These  Bruce Williams  How Stuff Works