March 5, 2014
Netanyahu's inaction to Obama's provocations sends powerful message
Kerry, after apparent criticism by Schumer, seeks to allay skepticism on diplomacy
How to ruin a perfectly good kid in 10 simple steps
2014 Oscars played it safe, but was faith lost in the shuffle?
Apple joins Hobby Lobby in touting corporate values beyond profit
March 3, 2014
Alina Dain Sharon: In the Hebrew calendar, a leap year has extra month, not day
Latest Obama appointment to prove Prez set on emasculating so-called Israel Lobby
Jewish World Review
Dec. 15, 2009 / 28 Kislev 5770
Civil Rights Commission Blunders Again
The U.S. Civil Rights Commission (yes, it's still around and yes, it's
outlived its usefulness) is about to subtract from national wisdom about
college admissions by focusing on exactly the wrong problem.
The commission has undertaken an inquiry to determine whether colleges
may be discriminating against female applicants. The question turns on
whether admissions officers, in an attempt to maintain rough gender
parity on campuses, are putting a thumb on the scale in favor of
underrepresented male applicants, thus disadvantaging the more qualified
That this is happening though it theoretically violates the law for
public institutions is an open secret. Women now earn 62 percent of
associate degrees, 58 percent of bachelor's degrees, and 60 percent of
master's degrees. Women's dominance in higher education would be even
more pronounced if colleges were truly gender blind in admissions. But
they are not. Swarthmore College in Pennsylvania admitted 19 percent of
male applicants last year but only 14 percent of females. The College of
William and Mary, a public college in Virginia, admitted 43 percent of
its male applicants and 29 percent of its female applicants last year.
Administrators worry that a severe imbalance of women to men will make
the campus less desirable for all applicants. Director of Admissions
Henry Broaddus told US News and World Report, "Even women who enroll …
expect to see men on campus. It's not the College of Mary and Mary; it's
the College of William and Mary."
US News estimates that most of the 1,400 colleges that participate in
its annual survey are offering more favorable admissions standards to
male than female applicants. Boys now need the extra help.
So we seem to have a problem here. For every 100 women who earn a
college degree, only 73 men do. These statistics practically shout "boy
crisis." Yet the Civil Rights Commission apparently sees the problem as
one of discrimination.
Let's suppose the commission finds the discrimination it is seeking
(which won't be hard). And let's imagine that they issue a blistering
report exhorting Congress and the nation to remedy this injustice. Will
women be happier at campuses in which men comprise only 35 or 40 percent
of the student population? Will our society be better off with women
outpacing men in education and income? Or might it be better to address
the flagging achievement of boys in our school system?
As nearly everyone who is not president of Harvard can acknowledge, boys
are the intellectual equals and sometimes superiors of girls. Despite
their diminished numbers in higher education, boys continue to perform
narrowly better on verbal standardized tests than girls, and
significantly better than girls in math. IQ experts agree that boys are
more represented at both ends of the bell curve than girls. James Q.
Wilson summed it up: "There are more male geniuses and more male
idiots." But girls are racking up the A's in primary, middle, and high
school. They are excelling at extracurricular activities. They are
assuming leadership posts, multitasking, and polishing the kinds of
resumes admissions officers admire.
Christina Hoff Sommers argued nearly a decade ago in "The War Against
Boys" that in our zeal to remedy past discrimination against girls, we
had managed to pathologize normal male behavior. The schools in
particular, she wrote, discouraged male strengths like competition and
drive in favor of female strengths like cooperation and detail work.
Let's concede that the campaign to boost girls' performance succeeded
very well. But with more than two decades of data showing diminishing
achievement by boys, it is past time to focus on reviving their
fortunes. Is it the schools' bias against competition? It's worth
examining particularly when we know that all of our kids, boys and
girls alike, will be competing against highly disciplined students from
India, China, and elsewhere who work twice as hard.
Or could it be another aspect of male brain development? The New York
Times profiled a fast-growing service catering to upper-middle-class
parents in New York organizational tutors. They help kids
(overwhelmingly boys) who are capable students but who cannot seem to
hand in assignments on time, keep their backpacks orderly, or their
notes current. "The guys just don't seem to develop the skills that
involve organization as early," explained psychologist Judith Kleinfeld.
The boy crisis may be an artifact of our weakened families, or our
feminized school environments, or Take Your Daughter to Work Day, or all
of the above. But as the mother of three sons, that messy backpack with
crumpled math homework due last week really resonated. The Civil Rights
Commission can do us all a favor by going away. Bring on the
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Comment on JWR contributor Mona Charen's column by clicking here.
Mona Charen Archives
© 2006, Creators Syndicate