 |
|
Feb. 8, 2013
|
| |
Jewish World Review
Dec. 7, 2011
/ 11 Kislev, 5772
Connecting the Feckless Foreign Policy Dots
By
Arnold Ahlert
| 
|
|
|
| |
|
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com |
There are no coincidences in politics. There is only calculation, and few administrations have been as calculating as this one as we head into the 2012 presidential campaign. Moreover, nowhere has that calculation been as circumspect as this president's treatment of Israel, or its reticence in doing what is necessary to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. It's time to connect some dots that need connecting.
We begin with last Wednesday's speech by Howard Gutman, the Obama administration's ambassador to Belgium. Speaking before an audience at a Jewish conference on anti-Semitism organized by the European Jewish Union (EJU), Gutman warned the audience that he was apologizing in advance, if what he had to say might not be to their liking. It wasn't. Gutman explained that there were two types of anti-Semitism. The first type is "traditional," which one assumes is the "good old fashioned kind," in all its "Jews descended from apes and pigs" and "drink the blood of Muslims" glory. That kind of anti-Semitism should be condemned, Gutman contended.
On the other hand, a distinction should be made between that kind of anti-Semitism and the anti-Semitism that arises from the ongoing conflict between the Jews and the Palestinians. A peace treaty between the two entities would significantly diminish that kind of anti-Semitism, according to Gutman. Previous to his speech, but obviously used as a rationale for it, Gutman showed a video of his appearance at a Muslim school in Brussels. He was greeted applause, which he contended was the kind of reception a Jew who supports the president's policy of "openness" to Islam could expect to receive.
The audience, comprised of Jewish lawyers from across Europe, was visibly stunned. The next speaker up, German attorney Nathan Gelbar offered a scathing rebuttal:
"The modern Anti-Semite formally condemns Anti-Semitism and the Holocaust and expresses upmost sympathy with the Jewish people. He simply has created a new species, the 'Anti-Zionist' or, even more sophisticated, the so-called 'Israel critic,'" said Gelbar. "The 'Israel critic' will never state 'Jews go home,' but is questioning the legality of the incorporation of the State of Israel and therefore the right for the Jewish people to settle in their homeland. He will not say the Jews are the evil of the world, but claim that the State of Israel is a major cause for instability and war in the region. There is no other country, no other people on this planet the 'Israel critic' would dedicate so much time and devotion as to the case of Israel."
| FREE SUBSCRIPTION TO INFLUENTIAL NEWSLETTER |
| Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". In addition to INSPIRING stories, HUNDREDS of columnists and cartoonists regularly appear. Sign up for the daily update. It's free. Just click here. | |
Why is a hack like Howard Gutman an ambassador in the first place? Perhaps being a major fundraiser for president Obama's 2008 election campaign was a contributing factor. Gutman was a campaign bundler who put together $500,000, including a personal contribution of $2300. He was nominated as the ambassador to Belgium by the president a year later.
On Sunday, both White House Speaker Tommy Vietor and Gutman himself were in damage-control mode. "We condemn anti-Semitism in all its forms and believe there is never any justification for prejudice against the Jewish people or Israel," said Vietor. "I strongly condemn anti-Semitism in all its forms. I deeply regret if my comments were taken the wrong way," said Gutman. "My own personal history and that of my family is testimony to the salience of this issue and my continued commitment to combatting anti-Semitism."
Next up, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta. Last Friday, Panetta, like Gutman, underscored the Obama administration's unsubtle contention that the chief impediment to peace in the Middle East is Israel. According to Panetta, "Israel can reach out and mend fences with those who share an interest in regional stability — countries like Turkey and Egypt, as well as Jordan. This is not impossible. If the gestures are rebuked, the world will see those rebukes for what they are. And that is exactly why Israel should pursue them." With respect to peace talks, it was Panetta's contention that Israel should "Just get to the damned table."
Let's review why those fences are broken. It was Turkey who engineered the 2010 flotilla seeking to break the Gaza blockade. Eight Turks and one Turkish-American were killed when flotilla flagship, Mavi Marmara, was boarded by Israeli commandoes. Turkey was incensed by Israel's refusal to apologize for the incident, and a U.N. report calling the blockade legal.
As for Egypt, who, exactly, should Israel be mending fences with? It was the Obama administration that stood aside and allowed long-time U.S. ally — and Egyptian/Israeli treaty-maintainer — Hosni Mubarak to fall. Who took his place? In the first round of elections since Mubarak's ouster, the Muslim Brotherhood's Justice and Peace Party won 40 percent of the vote, and the Salafist party al-Nour came in second, with 20 percent of the tally. Writer Mark Steyn illuminates the reality. "In the so-called Facebook Revolution, two-thirds of the Arab world's largest nation is voting for the hard, cruel, bigoted, misogynistic song of sharia."
As for Jordan, it was King Abdullah II who last May praised the reconciliation of Fatah and Hamas, and promised to help them in "confronting Israeli unilateral measures," with respect to Jerusalem. That would be the same Hamas still considered a terrorist organization by the United States, one whose charter still calls for the annihilation of Israel. Those are the "fences" Mr. Panetta contends must be mended. By Israel, no less.
Yet it is with respect to Iran that the administration's true fecklessness is revealed. Mr. Paentta offered the typical bromides. "No greater threat exists to the security and prosperity of the Middle East than a nuclear-armed Iran," he said, adding that Obama has not ruled out military force with respect to that threat. Then came the hedge. "We have to be careful about the unintended consequences" of an Israeli or U.S. attack.
Unintended consequences of an attack? What Mr. Panetta tellingly leaves out of the equation is the step taken by Britain in the latest rounds of sanctions against the world's most formidable terror threat. It was a step that undoubtedly precipitated the attacks on their embassies last week by government-endorsed thugs masquerading as students, despite Vice President Joe Biden's stunningly naive statement that there was "no indication" the attacks were orchestrated by the regime. What was the step Britain took? It was the first and only nation so far to completely sever its ties with the Iranian Central Bank.
Why hasn't the United States done the same? The administration claims the move, which calls for freezing US-based assets of any financial institutions that do business with the Central Bank, "could shatter a growing but fragile global consensus" and drive oil prices substantially higher, "inadvertently lining Iran's pockets."
How well did that argument resonate with the Senate? They voted 100-0 to cut off Iran's Central Bank from the global financing system. And one of the bill's co-sponsors, Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ), revealed the flaw in Leon Panetta's contention. "This is the maximum opportunity to have a peaceful diplomacy tool to stop Iran's march to nuclear weapons," said Menendez.
Yet the bill still contains an out for the president if such sanctions disrupt global oil supplies, or conflict with America's national security interests. Reality check? Saudi Arabia has already indicated a "great interest" in picking up any slack engendered by blocking Iran's oil exports. Their spare capacity of 4 million barrels of oil produced per day, could more than offset Iran's exports, currently totaling only 2.5 million barrels per day.
So why the hesitation on the part of the administration? Because Mr. Obama has an election to win in 2012, and anything that would even hint at another economic disruption, even one that could conceivably force regime change in Iran, will be met with the highest level of skepticism.
That skepticism includes another calculated, election-campaign dynamic. In order to maintain his bona fides with his environmentalist constituency, the president ordered yet another environmental review of the proposed Keystone KL oil pipeline project. It would delay any decision about the $7 billion effort until after the 2012 election. How disingenuous is the additional eighteen months? "The Keystone pipeline has already been held up for more than three years, despite being deemed environmentally sound," said Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH).
In other words, the president is willing to delay any effort to improve America's level of oil independence, even as it urges caution in putting the hammer down on Iran. That may benefit the president. But it is a policy completely at cross-purposes with America's national security interests. Interests that should prioritize weaning ourselves off oil imports from hostile nations as quickly as possible.
Those are the latest dots all that must be connected to an Obama administration purporting itself to be a tireless supporter of Israel, and one determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, no matter what it takes. There is time to rectify all of the above: Howard Gutman can be fired, a concerted effort can be undertaken to put the onus on peace in the Middle East exactly where it belongs, and a forceful confrontation of Iran that could engender regime change without all-out military action can be initiated — -even as we improve our domestic oil capacity.
None of it is likely to occur. And perhaps the only thing more likely than that prediction is the fact that Jewish American liberals will continue to support the most anti-Israeli administration since the one headed by Jimmy Carter, the president who authored "Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid."
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Comment on JWR Contributor Arnold Ahlert's column, by clicking here.
Previously:
12/05/11: Can We Keep Our Republic?
11/28/11: Cyber Crack-heads
11/21/11: Water Water Everywhere, But Not a Drop to Think
11/18/11: Walking along Avenue J(ew)
11/09/11: Military Scandal, Media Blackout
11/09/11: Open-Mics and Closed Minds
11/07/11: Back in the EU--SSR
10/31/11: Camping Out in La-La Land
10/14/11: Bagman Tim
10/13/11: Are Colleges Too Big to Fail?
10/11/11: Why aren't they upset when their child is mugged in school?
10/07/11: I Stand With the ‘One Percenters’
10/03/11: Can We Legalize Assassination?
09/29/11: Tim, Liz and Bev Equals Moe Larry and Curly
09/26/11: No Acknowledgment of Israel? No More Money
09/19/11: ‘Jobbing’ America
09/16/11: Carville knows a few things about ‘crazy’
09/12/11: Contemptible Krugman
09/09/11: Solving the 9/11 Invitation Controversy
09/06/11: Our Progressive Economic Wrecking Crew
09/01/11: Summer Swoon
08/29/11: The Real American Fanatics
08/24/11:The Five Stages of (Progressive) Grief
08/22/11:The Inevitable Descent From Progressivism to Nihilism
08/22/11: Perry Stands Firm. Obama Stands Mute
08/15/11: Give Me a Flatscreen TV, or Give Me Anarchy!
08/11/11: Resign, Mr. President
08/08/11: Facts? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Facts
08/03/11: Manufactured Crises
08/01/11: Stay Healthy, America --- or else!
07/28/11: Existential Crisis, Part 2
07/25/11: Three-Out-of-Four Americans Are Radicals
07/21/11: What Does Two Plus Two Equal?
07/18/11: News Nuggets
07/13/11: The ‘Write Stuff’
07/11/11: Completely Expectable ‘Unexpectedness’
07/07/11: Organized Cheating
07/05/11: Stimulating Disaster
06/30/11: Progressivism Masquerading as Education
06/27/11: America: Greece With Better PR
06/23/11: NBC-ya Later
06/19/11: One Man's Conversation About Race
06/10/11: An Exhibitionist in an Exhibitionist Age
06/07/11: NAACP Betrays Black American Schoolchildren
06/02/11: For the First Time in My Adult Life . . .
05/31/11: If I Were President
05/25/11: California Dreamin'
05/23/11: On Wisconsin!
05/20/11: Obama's Farewell to Israel Speech
05/16/11: ‘Krauthammering’ Amnesty
05/11/11: Bounce, My Backside
05/09/11: The Epicenter of Progressive Contempt for the Rule of Law
05/03/11: SEALing Osama's Fate
05/02/11: The Education plantation
04/24/11: The Bell May Toll for Jersey Toll Collectors
04/19/11: From Medical Dependency to Dependency on the Welfare State
04/14/11: Trumping the Debate
04/06/11: It Takes a Bigot to Expose a Death Cult
04/04/11: Charlie and Snookie --- and Barack
03/30/11: ‘Disabling’ America, One Lawsuit at a Time
03/28/11: The MSM Kills the ‘Kill Team’ Story
03/23/11: Another Military Scandal
03/21/11: Barry, Joe, Helen and Wisconsin Teachers
03/16/11: The Inevitable Viability of Conservatism
03/14/11: Progressives in Their Own Words
03/09/11: $61 Billion in Cuts --- Vs. $223 Billion in One Month of Spending
03/07/11: Bean Bag B.S.
03/02/11: A ‘Green’ Catastrophe in the Making
02/28/11: Ain't Noting Like the Real Thing
02/23/11: Progressive Rot vs. the ROTC
02/21/11: Wisconsin: Progressivism in All its Ugly Glory
02/18/11: News reporters --- or Narrative Shapers?
02/16/11: The Presidents Budget Proposal: An Obamination of Progressive Profligacy
02/14/11: Only Another 9/11 Will Alter the Illegal Immigration Status Quo
02/10/11: Is O'Reilly losing his touch or is he just irresponsible?
02/07/11: Tossing Britain Under the Bus
02/03/11: Starving the World In Order to Save It
01/31/11: Walking the Middle East Tightrope
01/27/11: Small-scale Terrorist Attacks: Big Strategy?
01/24/11: Jeffery Immelt: A Crony Capitalist In Charge of Job Creation
01/20/11: An ‘Intimate’ Prime-time Interview
01/17/11: Progressives: Always Angry, Newly Desperate
01/12/11: Twain vs. the Totalitarians
01/10/11: Politically Correct Passports?
01/05/11: Showdown at the Fiscal Corral
01/03/11: Reading the Constitution Aloud is a Good Start
12/30/10: Getting Our Moral Mojo Back
12/27/10: PC Airport Safety is an Oxymoron
12/23/10: Getting America Back On Track
12/20/10: A Collectivist Coalition of Convenience
12/15/10: The President Who Wasn't There
12/13/10: Tech-No!
12/08/10: A Lethal Military, Inclusive or Not
12/06/10: The ‘Unexpected’ Consequences of Progressivism
12/01/10: Leakers and Losers
11/29/10: ‘We Won’, Part One
11/22/10: Keep Your Hands Off My Constitution
11/17/10: Grope and Change
11/14/10: Taking Back Our Country, One School At a Time
11/11/10: Checks (and Balances), Please
11/08/10: Curtain Up, Progressives Down
11/04/10: Last Chance, Republicans
11/01/10: By Their Own Words Shall Ye Know Them
10/28/10: Progressive Determination to Undermine American Elections
10/25/10: Shock, but more importantly, action: De-Unionize Public Schools now
10/20/10: Multiculturalism? Check, Please
10/18/10: Healthcare: ‘Alice in Wonderland’ vs. The Constitution
10/11/10: Vote for Restoring the Rule of Law in November
10/11/10: Dems: Running From Clarity
10/07/10: Hypersensitive Hogwash
10/04/10: ‘Comprehensive’ Con Artists
09/29/10: Why Dems Are Going Down in November
09/27/10: The Unholiest of Unholy Alliances
09/22/10: Two Words for Republicans to Remember: ‘I Won’
09/20/10: Purging ‘Me First’ Politicians
09/17/10: No More ‘Lesser of Two Evils’
09/15/10: ‘Recovery’ Arms Race
09/13/10: ‘Bigots’ in the Majority --- Again?
09/09/10: Giving Voters Something to Vote For
09/07/10: Irresponsible Dems, Incomprehensible Bills
09/02/10: War Weary Americans vs. Implacable Islamists
08/31/10: A ‘Dream’ Debased
08/25/10: American ‘Bigots’ Versus Media Propagandists
08/23/10: Recovery Bummer
08/19/10: An Unholy Alliance of Radicals
08/16/10: You've Lost America, Mr. President
08/13/10: The Twin Towers of Progressive Disconnect
08/11/10: A Far Better ‘National Discussion’
08/09/10: It's ‘Only’ One Dead Nun
08/06/10: Incremental Tyranny
08/04/10: Ground Zero Mosque: Context Counts
08/02/10: The Arizona Ruling: a Gift for November
07/29/10: The United Cities of America
07/26/10: JournoList: ‘Coordinated’ Ideological Bankruptcy
07/20/10: Go For Broke Or Get Out of the Way
07/14/10: You're a Liberal/Progressive if You Believe…
07/12/10: $33-an-hour--For Sleeping On the Job
07/08/10: Extortionist Government
07/06/10: ‘Commerce Clause’ Totalitarians
07/01/10: Another Public School Travesty in MA
06/30/10: Calling YOUR Bluff, Mr. President
06/28/10: A Trifecta of Progressive Corruption
06/23/10: Plug the Darn Hole --- In Our Border
06/21/10: Our Empty-Suit-in-Chief
06/16/10: Betraying Our Children
06/14/10: Who Gets the Benefit of the Doubt?
06/07/10: Politically Correct Warfare
06/01/10: Bill Maher's ‘Black’ President
05/25/10: A Mosque At Ground Zero
05/23/10: Libs Stand Tall --- For Mexico
05/19/10: The 'Unintended Consequences' of Liberalism
05/17/10: 'Los' Suns: Stuck on Stupido
05/12/10: Union Audacity: Yes We Will!
05/10/10: Greeks, Leaks and and Double-Speak
05/05/10: Twelve Million Illegals --- or Thirty?
05/02/10: Republicans: Playing Not to Lose Doesn't Cut It
04/28/10: Arizona: Progressivism's Waterloo?
04/26/10: Son of Amnesty
04/22/10: Mortgages and Moral Meltdowns
04/20/10: Bashing Christians — Or Gays?
04/15/10: Personal Integri-‘tea’
04/12/10: Fools, Tools and Ghouls
04/08/10: (Tea) Party On
04/05/10: The Triumph of Mediocrity
04/02/10: Two For the Road
03/29/10: The Innate Immorality of Liberalism
03/24/10: The Art of War
03/22/10: I Want My Country Back
03/18/10: A Perpetual Process
03/17/10: American Exhibitionists
03/15/10: A Light Bulb Moment of Clarity
03/10/10: Little Things Mean A Lot
02/03/10: Budgetary Fork in the Road
02/01/10: Liberal Economic Illiteracy
01/27/10: ‘Roe-ing and Wade-ing’ Back to Reason
01/25/10: Arrogance When Up, Denial When Down
01/20/10: Connecting the Educational Dots
01/19/10: The Next Tea Party?
01/15/10: The Myth That Keeps on Giving
01/13/10: Airport Security Begins Away From the Airport
01/11/10: Secrets and Lies
01/08/10: Embracing Bigotry — or Rejecting Bullying?
01/06/10: Hanging by an Ideological Thread
01/04/10: Our ‘Wonderama’ Bureaucracy
12/30/09: A Day Off
12/28/09: Dangerous Myths
12/25/09: I, Me, Mine
12/23/09: A Very Harry Christmas
12/21/09: My Opinon
12/18/09: The Party of Repeal
12/15/09: Privileged Exemption
11/30/09: ‘Settled’ Science and Unsettled Children
11/30/09: American Sharia Law
11/23/09:The Trial (Travesty) of the Century
11/04/09: American Vampires and Their Political Enablers
11/01/09: ‘Opting Out’ of Insanity?
10/28/09: Cell Phones Cause Brain Cancer. Brain Required
10/26/09: Communism: Nazism With Better PR
10/21/09: Just Asking
10/16/09: Cost Projections vs. Actual Costs, or Hope and Change vs. Reality
10/14/09: News you can use …
10/07/09: Incremental Insidiousness
10/05/09: MIA: Common Sense and Common Decency
09/30/09: Iran: Bad Options and Unpreparedness
09/21/09: Crying Racism: the Last Refuge of Scoundrels
09/11/09: 9/11 Cannot Be Sanitized
09/08/09: ‘Truthers’ and Consequences
09/01/09: A ‘Paper Trail’ Challenge for the Mainstream Media
08/31/09: Drowning in Amorality
08/26/09: The Republican Recovery Program
© 2011, Arnold Ahlert
|
|
Arnold Ahlert
Mitch Albom
Jay Ambrose
Michael Barone
Barrywood
Lori Borgman
Stratfor Briefing
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Richard Z. Chesnoff
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Alan Douglas
Larry Elder
Suzanne Fields
Christine Flowers
Frank J. Gaffney
Bernie Goldberg
Jonah Goldberg
Julia Gorin
Jonathan Gurwitz
Paul Greenberg
Argus Hamilton
Victor Davis Hanson
Betsy Hart
Ron Hart
Nat Hentoff
Marybeth Hicks
A. Barton Hinkle
Jeff Jacoby
Paul Johnson
Jack Kelly
Ch. Krauthammer
David Limbaugh
Kathryn Lopez
Rich Lowry
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Ann McFeatters
Dale McFeatters
Dana Milbank
Jeanne Moos
Dick Morris
Jim Mullen
Deroy Murdock
Judge A. Napolitano
Bill O'Reilly
Kathleen Parker
Star Parker
Dennis Prager
Wesley Pruden
Tom Purcell
Sharon Randall
Robert Robb
Cokie & Steve Roberts
Heather Robinson
Debra J. Saunders
Martin Schram
Culture Shlock
David Shribman
Roger Simon
Michael Smerconish
Thomas Sowell
Ben Stein
Mark Steyn
John Stossel
Cal Thomas
Dan Thomasson
Bob Tyrrell
Diana West
Dave Weinbaum
George Will
Walter Williams
Byron York
ZeitGeist
Mort Zuckerman
Robert Arial
Chuck Asay
Baloo
Lisa Benson
Chip Bok
Dry Bones
John Branch
John Cole
J. D. Crowe
Matt Davies
John Deering
Brian Duffy
Everything's Relative
Mallard Fillmore
Glenn Foden
Jake Fuller
Bob Gorrel
Walt Handelsman
Joe Heller
David Hitch
Jerry Holbert
David Horsey
Lee Judge
Steve Kelley
Jeff Koterba
Dick Locher
Chan Lowe
Jimmy Margulies
Jack Ohman
Michael Ramirez
Rob Rogers
Drew Sheneman
Kevin Siers
Jeff Stahler
Scott Stantis
Danna Summers
Gary Varvel
Kirk Walters
Dan Wasserman
Mr. Know-It-All
Ask Doctor K
Richard Lederer
Frugal Living
On Nutrition
Bookmark These
Bruce Williams
|
