 |
|
May 20, 2013
Melissa Healy: Genetic copies of living people from embryos no longer science fiction
Jewz in the Newz by Nate Bloom : Jews Inducted into Rock Hall of Fame; Anton Yelchin co-stars in New "Trek" film; Kutcher (but not Kunis) visits Israel; Jewish TV Star Praises Jewish Rap Star
The Kosher Gourmet by Cathy Pollak: WARNING: This WALNUT CAKE WITH PRALINE FROSTING, perfect for afternoon coffee, is addicting
May 13, 2013
Rabbi Nathan Lopes Cardozo: Why the giving of the document that would permanently change the world could only be done in desolation
David G. Savage: Church-state, literally? Supreme Court weighing public school graduation in a church
May 10, 2013
Rabbi Berel Wein: Be all that you should be
May 8, 2013
Peter Ford: Why China is welcoming both Israel's Netanyahu and Palestinians' Abbas
Warren Richey: Obama administration quietly backs out of appeal over new contraceptive mandate
Fred Weir: At Kerry-Putin meeting, US-Russia relations thaw --- a tad
The Kosher Gourmet by Leela Cyd Ross : Almost too pretty to eat, this colorful salad with Sicilian inspiration will tickle the taste buds and delight your visual sensibility
May 6, 2013
May 3, 2013
Kids, kittens the Same? With employee perks at struggling Internet pioneer Yahoo! it's hard to tell
Sandy Kleffman: Artificial kidney offers hope to patients tethered to a dialysis machine
April 29, 2013
Roy Gutman: Poland's new Jewish museum celebrates life, doesn't revisit Holocaust
Mark Clayton: Terrorism in America: Is US missing a chance to learn from failed plots?
Kim Murphy: Boston Bomber's 'Svengali' Revealed
Pete Spotts: Tiny satellites + cellphones = cheaper 'eyes in the sky' for NASA
April 26, 2013
Clifford D. May: Defense in the Age of Jihadist Terrorism
Sharon Palmer, R.D.: How to feel your best -- with plenty of energy, a healthy weight and optimal mental and physical function -- without driving yourself batty
April 24, 2013
|
| |
Jewish World Review
Dec. 28, 2003
/ 4 Teves, 5764
Urban Legends of Vermont
By
Jonathan Tobin
Overreaction to Dean's loose tongue shouldn't stifle questions about
candidate's stands
http://www.jewishworldreview.com |
The first time I ever saw Howard Dean, he was looking very lonely.
The occasion was the first presidential candidates debate in 1996, when the
dead-in-the-water Bob Dole faced off in Hartford, Conn., with President Clinton.
After the debate, I spent a couple of hours in "Spin Alley," an open area in
the huge press room where luminaries from the major parties, including the t
hen little-known governor of Vermont, gathered to give their impressions about
the event we just witnessed.
The Democrats had the idea of having each of their celebrity spinners
accompanied by an aide, who held a sign with their man's name so as to alert the
media to their presence. But while you had to elbow your way through determined
throngs of scribblers to get nose to nose with various governors, senators and
members of the Cabinet present, the path to the governor of the Green Mountain State
was open.
Dean's aide waved his sign in vain, but few, if any, members of the media
cared to talk to him that night, leaving the scrappy physician-turned-politician
on the sidelines, looking as forlorn and frustrated as a wallflower at the
junior prom.
No one would have predicted that a little more than seven years later, the
same guy who was snubbed by the press corps would be on the verge of becoming
the Democratic Party's nominee for president of the United States. Though no
votes have yet been cast, right now it appears that the only candidate who can
stop the Dean juggernaut is Dean himself.
FOOT-IN-THE-MOUTH SYNDROME
That's because the candidate's offhand remarks now get the sort of attention
he once craved. Dean's candidacy has famously been built on the effective use
of the Internet, but that same medium can also be used against him, as his
campaign recently found out.
The cause of their concern is a mass e-mail that cites two recent Dean
quotes, and concludes that no one who "has any love for America and Israel" could
vote for Dean since he has "promised" not to support the Jewish state.
The comments were Dean's assertion that "the United States needs an
evenhanded approach in the [Arab-Israeli] conflict," and another where he referred to
members of Hamas as "soldiers" in a war against Israel.
The mass distribution of the e-mail was enough to send Dean's campaign into
action to counter it and, curiously, even got a response from the
Anti-Defamation League and various Jewish Community Relations Councils around the country,
agencies that don't normally leap to the defense of political candidates.
The e-mail was roundly denounced as an "urban legend." Dean himself claimed
that it must have been the work of Karl Rove, President Bush's political
mastermind.
Why all the fuss about an e-mail?
Most of it is driven by the fear shared by many in the Democratic Party that
Bush is heading for a far larger share of the Jewish vote next November that
any Republican has received since Ronald Reagan back in 1980. The Democrats
will need one of their key core constituencies to stay loyal if they are to have
a chance to unseat the incumbent.
But was the e-mail merely partisan propaganda?
The answer is mixed. Dean does now say many of the right things about the
enduring nature of the U.S.-Israel relationship, Palestinian terrorism and
Israel's right to defend itself. And, for the sake of argument, let's assume that
Dean's use of the term "evenhanded" was as innocent as he now claims it to be.
But even if we stick with Dean's official policy statements on Israel, some
serious questions remain.
CLINTON AS A ROLE MODEL
Dean claims that on the Israel issue, he will model his presidency on that of
Bill Clinton, and thinks Bush has erred at times by allowing the parties to
negotiate without U.S. involvement. That would mean a Dean presidency might
repeat many of the same mistakes that helped bring about the latest Palestinian
terror war and left Israel stranded.
Would Dean, as Clinton did, invite Yasser Arafat to the White House more
times than any other foreign leader? Others might ask why he thinks it's so
important to use the power of the presidency to create a Palestinian state when he
was so reluctant to use U.S. power against Saddam Hussein?
Why did he name as one of his foreign-policy advisers Clyde Prestowitz, an
author who advocates ending all U.S. aid to Israel to pressure it to make
concessions?
And, most importantly, how will a candidate whose base of support is on the
left-wing of the political spectrum — where hostility to Israel is now
commonplace — deal with the anti-Israel sentiments expressed by many of his supporters?
The truth is that there are a lot reasons, other than a few stray remarks, to
question the direction a Dean presidency might take on the Middle East. And
voters who care about Israel — Jews and non-Jews alike — have the
responsibility to try and make him answer these questions.
That's not to say that Bush should have a free ride from Jewish voters. Far
from it, since Bush has himself, with his road map peace plan, repeated many of
the mistakes Clinton made, mistakes he promised not to imitate.
But whether or not you think he has a realistic shot at defeating Bush next
November — and I doubt that he does — the focus now must be on pinning down Dean. As he moves toward the nomination, it's time to stop relying on e-mails
and spin, and think seriously about what a President Dean might do.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Jonathan S. Tobin is executive editor of the Philadelphia Jewish Exponent.
Let him know what you think by clicking here. In June, Mr. Tobin won first places honors in the American
Jewish Press Association's Louis Rapaport Award for Excellence in Commentary as
well as the Philadelphia Press Association's Media Award for top weekly
columnist. Both competitions were for articles written in the year 2002.
Jonathan Tobin Archives
© 2003, Jonathan Tobin
|
