
 |
|
February 10, 2012
Lisa M. Krieger: Man with defibrillator demands access to his own heart's information
David G. Savage: Why activists may not be in a hurry to have High Court rule on alternative marriage
February 9, 2012
Laura McMullen: 10 Least Expensive Public Schools for Out-of-State Students
Kimberly Palmer: How to actually enjoy -- relaxing, financially -- your vacation
February 8, 2012
Warren Richey: Why momentous Prop. 8 ruling might not satisfy gay-rights groups
Menachem Wecker: Though Controversial, LL.M.'s Can Lead to Specialized Legal Jobs
The Kosher Gourmet byDana Velden: Going to the bother of making soup? You know it better be good. This CREAM OF TOMATO SOUP certainly is! And it's a cinch to make, too (Includes techinques and serving secrets)
February 7, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.: Caught off-guard? President's Super Bowl interview with Matt Lauer gives those who need a reason not to vote for him, a darn good one
Suzanne Bohan: Leaping lizards! Tiny reptiles advancing robot design
February 6, 2012
Jonathan Tobin: Iran Threatens Israel With Destruction, But the New York Times Doesn't Hear It
Jeffrey Fleishman: In newly democratic Egypt, tens of democracy activists jailed, to stand trial; their groups are 'threatening the stability of the homeland'
Julie Deardorff : Researchers say antioxidants may not be that effective and could do more harm than good
Mark Clayton: How did Anonymous hackers eavesdrop on FBI and Scotland Yard?
February 3, 2012
Edmund Sanders : Israeli official says Iran is creating missile that could reach East Coast of US
Victoria Kim: Immigrant-smuggling ring used black drivers to avoid racial profiling
February 2, 2012
Jim Carney: Wrong number call may have saved her life
Reza Kahlili : Ex-CIA spy in Iran's Revolutionary Guard: What Obama doesn't grasp about striking deals with Tehran
Tina Susman: For woodchuck rescuer, every day is Groundhog Day
February 1, 2012
Brian Bennett: US officials see increasing threat of domestic attack from Iran
Emily Brandon: How to Take Advantage of New 401(k) Fee Disclosures
January 31, 2012
January 30, 2012
Paul Richter and Ramin Mostaghim: Misreading Teheran's limits -- deadly and economically devastating as they may be -- is a risk administration, Europe seem willing to take
Suzanne Bohan: Warning: Nap-deprived tots missing more than sleep, study finds
Meg Handley: Banks Revamping Rewards Programs to Woo Customers
January 27, 2012
Caroline B. Glick: Obama: Of course I intend to prevent a nuclear holocaust . . . in a few months
Yochonon Donn: In liberal New York City, fervently-Orthodox Jews may soon be getting a district to call their own
Jeannine Stein: An inflated ego and thinking you're 'all that' doesn't just make others sick of you, it can make you ill
Katy Hopkins: New budget rules may affect how much money you get for college
January 26, 2012
Ed Koch: To the New York Times, calling for the murder of Jews by those capable of having their incitement taken seriously isn't news
Jeannine Stein: Mental illness struck one in five U.S. adults in 2010: Report
January 25, 2012
Richard Simon: House passes two bills endorsing the use of religious symbols at military memorials
Fred Weir: Putin: Multiethnic Russia cannot survive as a US-style 'melting pot'; must find its own way
Susan Johnston: 5 Sneaky Coupon Strategies Consumers Should Watch Out For
January 24, 2012
Carol Clark: The price of your soul: How your brain decides whether to 'sell out'
Caroline B. Glick: America lost most in 'Arab Spring'. Sadly, many voters still don't grasp the extent
Warren Richey: Drug criminal scores win in GPS ruling from conservative-leaning high court
Erika Bolstad: Black conservatives gather to talk about gaining strength
January 23, 2012
Melissa Dribben: Jewish voters to play a key role in Florida's Republican primary
Jordan Rau: In quest to grow, Catholic hospital system will announce this morning its break from church
Ali Safi: U.S. envoy gives Taliban terms for peace talks
January 19, 2012
January 18, 2012
January 17, 2012
Frank J. Gaffney Jr.: No-kidding red lines: U.S. response to an Iranian nuke may be bluster, but Israel's won't be
David G. Savage: They sued their principals after slandering them online --- now the cases are headed to the Supreme Court
David Francis: Where to Invest in 2012: With stocks expected to rebound, opportunity abounds for investors
January 13, 2012
Ben Lynfield: Israeli lawmakers move to annex Jewish Judea, one museum at a time
Alexia Elejalde-Ruiz: Thriving through touch: Gentle massage helps older people with low mobility improve in mind and body
January 12, 2012
Warren Richey: Landmark Supreme Court ruling a 'resounding win' for religious groups
Warren Richey: Supreme Court says no to new rule on eyewitness testimony
John Fauber : Statins found to raise diabetes risk in postmenopausal women
Katy Hopkins : Consider This Before You Pay for an Online Degree
The Kosher Gourmet by Joseph Erdos: This mushroom and barley soup has an intense -- almost nutty -- flavor that mixes robust with Middle East. It has creaminess without cream
January 11, 2012
Shari Roan: Millions of atrial fibrillation sufferers at risk for devastating, but preventable, stroke
Tom Hussain: Pakistan -- recipient of more than $21 billion in civilian and military aid -- speeds pursuit of Iranian pipeline, defying US
David G. Savage: High court signals it won't be loosening TV's 'indecency' rules
Stephen Ceasar: Oklahoma's Islamic law amendment can't go into effect, court rules
January 10, 2012
Reza Kahlili: From an ex-CIA spy: US must exploit new split in Iran's Revolutionary Guard
Karen Kaplan: Study: Nicotine replacement products ineffective when used in real-life situations
January 9, 2012
Michael Doyle: Put through legal hell over dream home, couple fought back hard --- all the way to Supreme Court
|
| |
Jewish World Review
Nov. 11, 2004
/ 27 Mar-Cheshvan, 5765
They still don't get it
By
Jonathan Tobin
Explaining why Israel notwithstanding, Jewish liberal voters remain fearful of the faithful
http://www.jewishworldreview.com |
For American Jewish liberals, this has been a week to keep the windows on upper floors locked tightly and plenty of tissues handy.
For them, the outcome of last week's elections was a nightmare. The man they hate and fear won because the people they most hate and fear turned out at the polls to vote for "moral values" that they think threaten the future of American democracy.
The re-election of President George W. Bush was not only the triumph of a candidate that they despised, but most of the post-election chatter from the media confirmed their worst fears about the state of American society and politics.
Are they right to be so scared?
First, let's make it clear that despite the positive spin coming from some Jewish Republicans, the 2004 election demonstrated convincingly that the Jewish vote isn't shifting or even budging very much. The same exit polls that talked of the election being won on "moral values" revealed that only 24 percent of American Jewish voters chose Bush, solidifying their position as one of the most reliably Democratic sectors of the population.
UP 5%
That was up only 5 percent from Bush's dismal 19 percent in the 2000 election. So were the Republicans wrong to spend all that time and effort on making their case that Jewish voters should abandon their ancestral political home and vote for Bush?
Probably not. According to the exit polls, 3 percent of the electorate was identified as Jewish. So what does 5 percent of 3 percent amount to when the counting is done? Plenty. Even a small shift in the vote in certain states was helpful to the president as he worked toward a majority of the Electoral College. And when you are building a 3.5 million vote Republican margin of victory, the extra 175,000 votes that a 5 percent change represented is nothing to sneeze at. If those 175,000 votes were based on Bush's stand on the war on terror or on support for Israel that probably justified the GOP strategy.
It is also probably true that Republicans did far better among Orthodox Jews, achieving perhaps as much as two-thirds of that relatively small slice of the public.
But that said, it cannot be denied that if the Jewish vote is changing, it isn't happening at a rate likely to approach a Republican majority for at least another generation, if it ever happens at all.
But for all the overblown analysis about exit polls showing religious Christians being the reason why Bush won, it must be said that it is precisely this image of the "red state" voter that seems to be keeping the Jews firmly in the pockets of the Democrats.
Republicans may be right that Bush's generally sterling record on Israel was the reason why those 175,000 Jewish voters switched to the GOP this time. But Democrats who believe that the fear of the Christian right kept the Jewish vote for Kerry at 74 percent are equally correct.
FEAR AND LOATHING
This can be measured not only in the statements issued by liberal Jewish groups expressing fear about the future of abortion rights and the environment, but in the sheer contempt expressed by many rank-and-file "blue state" Jewish Democrats about the 51 percent of Americans who voted for Bush.
Like some frustrated European newspaper editors who asked in their post-election headlines how 59 million-plus Americans could "be so dumb," many Jewish liberals I spoke to regarded the election as one that was won by faith over science. This reflected a belief in their own inherent superiority over what they think are their dimwit ideological foes. Yet besides elitist arrogance, it also reflected the deep fears that many Jews have about living in a world where faith is paraded openly in the political arena.
It is not just that they consider conservative manipulation of the "rabble" to reflect the latter's lack of sophistication. Liberal Jews truly seem to believe that the deep philosophical differences in this country over issues such as abortion and gay marriage represent a spiritual chasm between freedom and tyranny.
The point is, if you believe only a fool would vote for the Republicans, then how can you trust such a majority to safeguard minority rights. And it is not a stretch to conclude that a large number of Jewish voters genuinely believe that the Christian right intends to subvert democracy in the name of Christianity? While most conservatives feel no threat to the separation of church and state in these debates, liberals see the wolf at the door.
For this portion of the electorate, the notion that the Democrats failed because they were not able to express their faith convincingly is anathema because it is precisely the public expression of faith that scares them. Such a world, they believe, is inherently dangerous for Jews and any minority.
TIMES HAVE CHANGED
That view may have been justified by the world our grandparents grew up in, where the extent of Christian religiosity was a good indicator of anti-Semitism. But though most Jews haven't noticed it, that isn't the case anymore. Indeed, it is the liberal Protestant sects, which Jews still see as natural allies on domestic issues, that more and more seem vulnerable to the virus of anti-Semitism, especially where Israel is concerned.
Nor does the fact that these same evangelicals whom we fear so much remain staunch friends of Israel and act as far more of a check on any possible Bush administration tilts toward the Palestinians than the vaunted "Jewish lobby" seem to impress most Jews.
Polls notwithstanding, attitudes toward terrorism may have decided the election far more than attitudes about faith.
But the truth is, the majority of Americans are comfortable with placing faith in a political context, and inherently distrust politicians who aren't. The average liberal Jewish voter feels just the opposite. So long as that remains the case, expecting a major shift in the Jewish vote is probably unrealistic.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Jonathan S. Tobin is executive editor of the Philadelphia Jewish Exponent.
Let him know what you think by clicking here.
Jonathan Tobin Archives
© 2004, Jonathan Tobin
|